Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 267, 2021
7th International Conference on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ICESCE 2021)
Article Number 01022
Number of page(s) 5
Section Energy Development and Utilization and Energy-Saving Technology Application
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126701022
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. Poff, N.L., Richter, B.D., Arthington, A.H., et al. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biol. 2010, 55, 147-170. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ocock, J.F., Bino, G., Wassens, S., et al. Identifying critical habitat for Australian freshwater turtles in a large regulated floodplain: implications for environmental water management. Environ. Manage. 2018, 61, 375-389. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pastor, A.V.;, Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., et al. Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 5041-5059. [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies, P.M., Naiman, R.J., Warfe, D.M., et al. Flow–ecology relationships: closing the loop on effective environmental flows. Mar. Freshwater Res. 2014, 65, 133. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mackie, J.K., Chester, E.T., Matthews, T.G., et al. Macroinvertebrate response to environmental flows in headwater streams in western Victoria, Australia. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 53, 100-105. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gates, K.K., Vaughn, C.C., Julian, J.P. Developing environmental flow recommendations for freshwater mussels using the biological traits of species guilds. Freshwater Biol. 2015, 60, 620-635. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nikghalb, S., Shokoohi, A., Singh, V.P., et al. Ecological regime versus minimum environmental flow: comparison of results for a river in a Semi Mediterranean Region. Water resour. Manag. 2016, 30, 4969-4984. [Google Scholar]
  8. Theodoropoulos, C., Skoulikidis, N., Rutschmann, P., et al. Ecosystem-based environmental flow assessment in a Greek regulated river with the use of 2D hydrodynamic habitat modelling. River Res. Appl. 2018, 34, 538-547. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bunn, S.E., Arthington, A.H. Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity. Environ. Manage. 2002, 30, 492-507. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Q., Singh, V.P., Li, J. Eco-hydrological requirements in arid and semiarid regions: Case study of the Yellow River in China. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2012, 18, 689-697. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kong, D., Miao, C., Borthwick, A.G., et al. Evolution of the Yellow River Delta and its relationship with runoff and sediment load from 1983 to 2011. J. Hydrol. 2015, 520, 157-167. [Google Scholar]
  12. Poff, N.L., Allan, J.D., Bain, M.B., et al. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 1997, 47, 769-784. [Google Scholar]
  13. Horne, A., Kaur, S., Szemis, J., et al. Using optimization to develop a “designer” environmental flow regime. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2017, 88, 188-199. [Google Scholar]
  14. Viliam, M., Zuzana, Š., Martina, M., et al. Influence of discharge on fish habitat suitability curves in mountain watercourses in IFIM methodology. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 2018, 66, 12-22. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, P., Shen, Y., Wang, C., et al. An improved habitat model to evaluate the impact of water conservancy projects on Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) spawning sites in the Yangtze River, China. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 104, 165-176. [Google Scholar]
  16. Poff, N.L., Allan, J.D. Functional organization of stream fish assemblages in relation to hydrological variability. Ecology 1995, 76, 606-627. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang, X., He, H., Qv, S., et al. Condition of the aquatic ecosystem of the mainstream of the Yellow River. In Impacts of Reservoirs in the Mainstream of the Yellow River on Riverine Ecosystem and Ecological Regulation, 1st ed.; Jiang, X.; He, H., Eds. Yellow River Water Conservancy Press: Zhengzhou, China, 2012; pp. 24-61. [Google Scholar]
  18. Poff, N.L., Schmidt, J.C. How dams can go with the flow. Science 2016, 353, 1099-1100. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.