Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 273, 2021
XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2021”
Article Number 11001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Semantics of Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127311001
Published online 22 June 2021
  1. S. Bezoluk, E. Azarko, V. Sannikova, O. Derezko, The initiation of the students’ meaning formation via the meaning essay E3S Web Conf. 210, 18059 (2020) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021018059 [Google Scholar]
  2. G.G. Shpet, The Internal Form of the Word: Etudes and Variations on Humboldt's themes, 216 (Moscow: Komkniga, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. D. A. Leontiev, Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality (Moscow: Smysl, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. I. V. Abakumova, A. M. Kukular, V. T. Fomenko, Meaning-didactics as a systemic embodiment of a general theory of meaning in the practice of the educational process. Russian psychological journal, 11(3), 24–32 (2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2014.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Yu. Zilberbrand, Didactic essence of meaning tasks, Bulletin of Cherepovets state University 4, 106–109 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. E.S. Zorina, I. S. Dyshlyuk, Effective semantic techniques in the practice of the educational process (Rostov-on-Don, Feniks, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. A. Leont'ev, The challenge of uncertainty as a Central problem of personality 8(40), 2 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Kagermazova, TS Semantic communications as a type of interaction between teachers and students in “our new school», Russian psychological journal 11(3), 49–57 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. P. Bezoluk, Meaning formation as a component of the development of digital competencies of adolescents, 12, 41–52 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. V. P. Belyanin, Psychological linguistics. Text as a reflection of the inner worlds of the author and the reader, 320 (Moscow: Genezis, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. A.V. Vdovichenko, E.F. Tarasov, Verbal data as part of a communicative action: language, text, author, interpreter 4(34), 22–39 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. U.I. Sukhanova, Analysis of techniques contributing to successful essay writing, School pedagogy 1, 57 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Poldner, P.R.J. Simons, G. Wijngaards, van der M.F. Schaaf, Quantitative content analysis procedures to analyse students’ reflective essays: A methodological review of psychometric and edumetric aspects. Educational Research Review Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved February 7(1), 19–37 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Wilson, Universal screening with automated essay scoring: Evaluating classification accuracy in grades 3 and 4, Journal of School Psychology 68, 19–37 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.005 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Elwood Romig, A. A. Miller, W. J. Therrien, J. W. Lloyd, Meta-Analysis of Prompt and Duration for Curriculum-Based Measurement of Written Language. UniversityofTexasatArlington, Exclusivity, (2020) DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2020.1743706 [Google Scholar]
  16. B. MacWhinney, Neuroemergentism: Levels and constraints, Journal of Neurolinguistics 49, 232–234 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.04.002 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. MacWhinney, Psycholinguistics: Overview, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 353–358 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.57010-X [Google Scholar]
  18. A.N. Katz, K.A. Hussey, Psycholinguistics, in Encyclopedia of Creativity (Second Edition), 271–278 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00185-0 [Google Scholar]
  19. O. Bott, P. Augurzky, W. Sternefeld, R. Ulrich, Incremental generation of answers during the comprehension of questions with quantifiers, Cognition 166, 328–343 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.023 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. E. Brennan, A. Galati, A. K. Kuhlen, Two Minds, One Dialog: Coordinating Speaking and Understanding, Psychology of Learning and Motivation 53, 301–344 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53008-1 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. F. Kroll, P. E. Dussias, C. A. Bogulski, J. R. Valdes Kroff, Juggling Two Languages in One Mind: What Bilinguals Tell Us About Language Processing and its Consequences for Cognition, in Psychology of Learning and Motivation 56, 229–262 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394393-4.00007-8 [Google Scholar]
  22. B. Hemforth, B. Mertins, C. Fabricius-Hansen, Psycholinguistic Approaches to Meaning and Understanding across Languages, Springer International Publishing, 251–258 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284454518_Psycholinguistic_Approaches_to_Meaning_and_Understanding_across_Languages (Last accessed 2021/12/03) [Google Scholar]
  24. O. María, A. de la Rosa, Evaluation of emotional and psycholinguistic problems in deaf and hard-of-hearing students in the Canary Islands, Heliyon 7(3), e06446 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06446 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. R.S.W. Alyahya, A. D. Halai, P. Conroy, M. A. L. Ralph, Mapping psycholinguistic features to the neuropsychological and lesion profiles in aphasia, Cortex 124, 260–273 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.002 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Monaghan, S. G. Roberts, Cognitive influences in language evolution: Psycholinguistic predictors of loan word borrowing, Cognition 186, 147–158 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.007 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. B. Ratner, J. Berko Gleason, Psycholinguistics, Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, 1199–1204 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.22185-8 [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Arabski, A. Wojtaszek, Neurolinguistic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives on SLA, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33(1), 144–145 (2011) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000665 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.