Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 283, 2021
2021 3rd International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Urban Engineering (ICCAUE 2021)
Article Number 02044
Number of page(s) 9
Section Urban Planning and Protection of Natural Environment Facilities
Published online 07 July 2021
  1. Biggar, K., and Masala, S. (1998). Alternatives to sandbags for temporary flood protection. Technical report. Disaster Services Branch, Alberta Transportation and Utilities, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fowler, J. (1997). Geotexitile tubes and flood control. Geotechnical Fabrics Report,15(5): 28–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leshchinsky, D., Leshchinsky, O., Ling, H.I., and Gilbert, P.A. (1996). Geosynthetic tubes for confining pressurized slurry: Some design aspects. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(8): 682690. [Google Scholar]
  4. Plaut, R.H., and Suherman, S. (1998). Twodimensional analysis of geosynthetic tubes. Acta Mechanica 129(3): 207–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cantré, S., and Saathoff, F. (2011). Design method for geotextile tubes considering strain-formulation and verification by laboratory tests using photogrammetry. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 29(3): 201–210. [Google Scholar]
  6. Guo, W., Chu, J., and Nie, W. (2014). A simplified method for the design of geosynthetic tube. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 42(5): 421–427. [Google Scholar]
  7. Guo, W., Chu, J., and Nie, W. (2014). Analysis of geosynthetic tubes inflated by liquid and consolidated soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 42(4): 277–283. [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo, W., Chu, J., Yan, S., and Nie, W. (2013). Geosynthetic mattress: Analytical solution and verification[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 37:87–80. [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo, W., Chu, J., and Yan, S. (2011). Effect of subgrade soil stiffness on the design of geosynthetic tube. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(3), 277–284. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cantré, S. (2002). Geotextile tubes-analytical design aspects[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 20(5): 305–319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Plaut, R.H., and Klusman, C.R.(1999). Twodimensional analysis of stacked geosynthetic tubes on deformable foundations. Thin-Walled Structures 34(3): 179–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghavanloo, E., and Daneshmand, F. (2008). Twodimensional analytical analysis of equilibrium shape of inflated geomembrane tube resting on rigid foundation with arbitrary shape[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27(2): 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  13. Malik Josef. (2007). Some problems connected with 2D modeling of geosynthetic tubes[J]. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 10(2): 810–823. [Google Scholar]
  14. Malik Josef., and Stanislav Sysala. (2010). Analysis of geosynthetic tubes filled with several liquids with different densities[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29(3): 249–256. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huong, T.C., Plaut, R.H., and Filz, G.M. (2002). Wedged geomembrane tubes as temporary floodfighting devices. Thin-Walled Structures, 40(11),913–923. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, M., Freeman, M., FitzPatrick, B.T., Nevius, D.B., Plaut, R.H., and Filz, G.M. (2004). Use of an apron to stabilize geomembrane tubes for fighting floods. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 22(4): 239–254. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, M., M. Moler, M. Freeman, G.M. Filz, and R.H. Pluaut. (2005b). Stacked geomembrane tubes for flood control: experiments and analysis. Geosynthetics International 12(5): 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, M., Filz, G.M., and Plaut, R.H. (2005). Twochambered water filled geomembrane tubes used as water barriers: Experiments and analysis. Geosynthetics International, 12(3): 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, L., Yue, C., and Guo, W. (2017). Lateral stability analysis of wedged geomembrane tubes using PFC2D. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 35(5): 730–737. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sun L., Qi Y., Gao X., Guo, W., and Zhang, N. (2019). Stability of supported geomembrane tube flood barriers of novel design[J]. Journal of Flood Risk Management,13(1): 1–10. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.