EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 297 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 297 (2021) 01069 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 297, 2021
The 4th International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE'2021)
Article Number 01069
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129701069
Published online 22 September 2021
  1. W.H. Inmon, Building the Data Warehouse: Getting Started, JohnWiley (2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Eberendu, Unstructured Data: An overview of the data of Big Data, IJCTT, 38 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Thomas, P.S. Nair, Data Lake: A Centralized Repository, IRJET 7, 5 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Paschalidi Data Governance: A Conceptual Framework in Order to Prevent Your Data Lake from Becoming a Data Swamp, 2015, https://ltu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1019917&dswid=2135 [Google Scholar]
  5. P.N. Sawadogo, É. Scholly,C. Favre, É. Ferey, S. Loudcher, J. Darmont, Metadata Systems for Data Lakes: Models and Features, in European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, CCIS, Vol. 1064, 8–11 September, Bled, Slovenia (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Scholly, P. Sawadogo, P. Liu, J.A. Espinosa-Oviedo, C. Favre, S. Loudcher, J. Darmont, C. Nouss, Coining goldmedal: A new contribution to data lake generic metadata modelling, in International Workshop on Design, Optimization, Languages and Analytical Processing of Big Data, DOLAP, Vol. 2840, 23 March, Nicisia, Cyprus (2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Fang, Managing data lakes in Big Data era: What's a data lake and why has it became popular in data management ecosystem, in the International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems; CYBER, 8-12 June, Shenyang, China (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Laplante, B. Sharma, Architecting Data Lakes, O'Reilly Media (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Menon, Demystifying data lake architecture, in Meduim https://rpradeepmenon.medium.com/demystifying-data-lake-architecture-30cf4ac8aa07, 6 July(2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Nadipalli, Effective Business Intelligence with QuickSight, Packt Publishing (2017). [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Ravat, Y. Zhao, Data Lakes: Trends and Perspectives, in International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, CCIS, Vol. 1062, 26-29 August, Linz, Austria (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Inmon, Data Lake architecture: Designing the Data Lake and avoiding the garbage dump, Technics Publications (2016). [Google Scholar]
  13. M.R. Llave, Data lakes in business intelligence: Reporting from the trenches, Procedia Computer Science 138(2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Oram, Managing the data lake, Zaloni (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Diamantini , P.L. Giudice, L. Musarella, D. Potena, E. Storti, D. Ursino, A new meta-data model to uniformly handle heterogeneous data lake sources, in European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, CCIS, Vol. 909, 2-5 September, Budapest, Hungary (2018). [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Ravat, Y. Zhao, Metadata management for data lakes, in European Conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, CCIS, Vol. 1064, 8-11 September, Bled, Slovenia (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Eichler, C. Giebler, C. Gröger, H. Schwarz, B. Mitschang, HANDLE - A Generic Metadata Model for Data Lakes, in the International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery, LNCS, Vol. 12393, 14-17 Septembre, Bratislava, Slovakia (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Hai, S. Geisler, C. Quix, Constance : An Intelligent Data Lake System, in The international Conference on Management of Data , SIGMOD, 26 Jun-1 July, NewYork, United States (2016). [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Solodovnikova, L. Niedrite, Change Discovery in Heterogeneous Data Sources of a Data Warehouse, in The International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, CCIS, Vol. 1243, 16-19 June, Tallinn, Estonia (2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Maccioni, R. Torlone, KAYAK : A Framework for Just-in-Time Data Preparation in a Data Lake, in The International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS,Vol. 10816, 15-16 June, Tallinn, Estonia (2018). [Google Scholar]
  21. M.M. Mkhinini, O. Labbani-Narsis, C. Nicolle, Combining UML and ontology: An exploratory survey, COSREV, 35, 1–14 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. LeGuennec, Méthodes formelles avec uml, in CFIP, Hermes (2000). [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Kogut, S. Cranefield, L. Hart, M. Dutra, K. Baclawski, M. Kokar, J. Smith, UML for ontology development, KER 17, 61–64 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  24. O. El Hajjamy, K. Alaoui, L. Alaoui, M. Bahaj, Mapping UML to OWL2 ontology, JTAIT 90, 126–143(2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Zedlitz, N. Luttenberger, Transforming between UML conceptual models and owl 2 ontologies, in The Terra Cognita Workshop on Foundations, Technologies and Applications of the Geospatial Web, ISWC, Vol. 901, 12 Novembre, Boston, USA (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Belghiat, M. Bourahla, Transformation of UML models towards OWL ontologies, in International Conference on Sciences of Electronics, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications, SETIT, 21-24 March, Sousse, Tunisia (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. Unified Modeling Language, Version 2.5, OMG, 2015, http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5 [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Zedlitz, N. Luttenberger, Conceptual modelling in UML and OWL-2, in International Journal on Advances in Software 7, 182–196 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Zedlitz, N. Luttenberger, Data types in UML and OWL-2, in The International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing, SEMAPRO, Vol. 1, 29 September-3 October, Porto, Portugal (2013). [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Sadowska, Z. Huzar, Representation of UML Class Diagrams in OWL 2 on the Background of Domain Ontologies, EISEJ 13, 63–103(2019). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.