Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 312, 2021
76th Italian National Congress ATI (ATI 2021)
Article Number 08002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Systems for Sustainable Energy Generation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131208002
Published online 22 October 2021
  1. J. Lu and X. Gao, “Biogas: Potential, challenges, and perspectives in a changing China,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 150, p. 106127, Jul. 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. MosayebNezhad, A. S. Mehr, M. Gandiglio, A. Lanzini, and M. Santarelli, “Techno-economic assessment of biogas-fed CHP hybrid systems in a real wastewater treatment plant,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 129, pp. 1263–1280, Jan. 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Kluczek, “Dynamic energy LCA-based assessment approach to evaluate energy intensity and related impact for the biogas CHP plant as the basis of the environmental view of sustainability,” in Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 21, pp. 297–304, DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Teymoori Hamzehkolaei and N. Amjady, “A techno-economic assessment for replacement of conventional fossil fuel based technologies in animal farms with biogas fueled CHP units,” Renew. Energy, vol. 118, pp. 602–614, Apr. 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Wang, L. Wehrle, A. Banerjee, Y. Shi, and O. Deutschmann, “Analysis of a biogas-fed SOFC CHP system based on multi-scale hierarchical modeling,” Renew. Energy, vol. 163, pp. 78–87, Jan. 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Stürmer, D. Leiers, V. Anspach, E. Brügging, D. Scharfy, and T. Wissel, “Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters,” Renew. Energy, vol. 164, pp. 171–182, Feb. 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.074. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Calbry-Muzyka et al., “Sampling, on-line and off-line measurement of organic silicon compounds at an industrial biogas-fed 175-kWe SOFC plant,” Renew. Energy, vol. 177, pp. 61–71, Nov. 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.047. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Reale, R. Stolica, M. Gaeta, M. Ferri, M. Sarnataro, and V. Vitale, “Analisi e stima quantitativa della potenzialità di produzione energetica da biomassa digeribile a livello regionale. Studio e sviluppo di un modello per unità energetiche Parte 1-Metodologia,” p. 129, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Adella, G. Aragona, I. Lupica, L. Muto, V. Laboni, and Pasquale De Stefanis, “Rapporto sul recupero energetico da rifiuti in Italia,” p. 331, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. “Natural gas price statistics - Statistics Explained.” [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Natural_gas_price_statistics. [Accessed: 03-Jun-2021]. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Caputo, Fattori di emissione atmosferica di gas serra nel settore elettrico nazionale e nei principali Paesi Europei. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. “Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle | Green Vehicle Guide | US EPA.” [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle. [Accessed: 03-Jun-2021]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.