Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 318, 2021
Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering – Iraq (ICGE 2021)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 9
Section Developments in Geotechnical Engineering
Published online 08 November 2021
  1. Jamel, A.A.J., Irzooki, R.H. and Al-Obaidi, A.A., 2020. Behavior of Gravity Dams Affected by Earthquakes as A Review. Solid State Technology, 63(5), pp.8317–8338. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghanaat, Y. and Chudgar, A.K., 2007. Seismic Design and Evaluation of Concrete Dams-An Engineering Manual. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Heshmati, M., Boodagh, P. and Salamon, J.W., 2019. Probabilistic Identification of Seismic Response Mechanism in a Class of Similar Arch Dams. Infrastructures, 4(3), p.44. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wagle D., 2010. Earthquake Response of Concrete Gravity Dams. M.Sc. Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  5. US Army Corps of Engineers, 2007. Earthquake design and evaluation of concrete hydraulic structures engineer, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zappitelli, M.P., Villa, E.I., Fernândez-Sâez, J. and Rocco, C., 2014. Cracking Development Prediction in Concrete Gravity Dams using Concrete Damage Plasticity Model. Mecânica Computacional, 33(14), pp.909–921. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, M., Chen, J., Wei, H., Song, B. and Xiao, W., 2019. Investigation on seismic damage model test of a high concrete gravity dam based on application of FBG strain sensor. Complexity, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Das, R. and Cleary, P.W., 2013. A mesh-free approach for fracture modelling of gravity dams under earthquake. International Journal of Fracture, 179(1-2), pp.9–33. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeidan B.A. and Seleemah A., 2018. Seismic stability analysis of concrete gravity dams. Conference ICOLD, at Vienna, 1-7/7/2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mandal, K.K. and Maity, D., 2018. Transient response of concrete gravity dam considering dam-reservoir-foundation interaction. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 22(2), pp.211–233. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zeydan, A.B., 2013, April. Seismic Dam-Reservoir Interaction of Concrete Gravity Dams. In 9th European Club Symposium (pp. 10–12). [Google Scholar]
  12. Yamaguchi, Y., Hall, R., Sasaki, T., Matheu, E., Kanenawa, K.I., Chudgar, A. and Yule, D., 2004, August. Seismic performance evaluation of concrete gravity dams. In Proceedings of the 13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. [Google Scholar]
  13. Aldemir, A., Binici, B., Canbay, E.R.D.E.M., Kurc, O. and Arici, Y.A.L.I.N., 2014. Pseudo dynamic test results of a concrete gravity dam. Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska. [Google Scholar]
  14. Banerjee, A., Paul, D.K. and Acharyya, A., 2015. Optimization and safety evaluation of concrete gravity dam section. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(6), pp.1612–1619. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, M., Chen, J., Fan, S. and Lv, S., 2014. Experimental study on high gravity dam strengthened with reinforcement for seismic resistance on shaking table. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 51(4), pp.663–683. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zheng, X. and Hao, J., 2019, November. Research on Seismic Assessment of Gravity Dam Based on Performance Analysis. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 376, No. 1, p. 012036). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mohsin, A.Z., Omran, H.A. and Al-Shukur, A.H.K., 2015. Dynamic response of concrete gravity dam on random soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 6(11), pp.21–31. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shuai Li, Tanzim, M., Roger, P., Shahria, A., CSCE M., and Anas, S., 2019. Comparative seismic performance of dams in canada and china using numerical analysis and shake table testing. ICOLD 2019 Annual Meeting/Symposium, Ottawa, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ganji, H.T., Alembagheri, M. and Khaneghahi, M.H., 2019. Evaluation of seismic reliability of gravity dam-reservoirinhomogeneous foundation coupled system. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 13(3), pp.701–715. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ali, M.H., Alam, M.R., Haque, M.N. and Alam, M.J., 2012. Comparison of design and analysis of concrete gravity dam. Natural Resources, 3, pp. 18–28. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang J., 2011. Seismic response evaluation of concrete gravity dams subjected to spatially varying earthquake ground motions. Ph.D., Thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia, [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, D.H., Yang, Z.H., Wang, M. and Xie, J.H., 2019. Seismic performance and failure modes of the Jin'anqiao concrete gravity dam based on incremental dynamic analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 100,pp.227–244. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ghallab, A., 2020. Simulation of Cracking in High Concrete Gravity Dam Using the Extended Finite Elements by ABAQUS. American Journal of Mechanics and Applications, 8(1), pp.7–15. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeidan, B.A., 2014. Design and analysis of concrete gravity dam. Article Review. Tanta University. [Google Scholar]
  25. Segura, R.L., Bernier, C., Durand, C. and Paultre, P., 2019. Modelling and characterizing a concrete gravity dam for fragility analysis. Infrastructures, 4(4), p.62. [Google Scholar]
  26. IBC-CODE, 2018. International Building Code. USA. [Google Scholar]
  27. Al-Qaisi Z. A. M., 2016. Optimal design of concrete gravity dams of random soil, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, G., Wang, Y., Lu, W., Yan, P., Zhou, W. and Chen, M., 2017. Damage demand assessment of mainshock-damaged concrete gravity dams subjected to aftershocks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98,pp.141–154. [Google Scholar]
  29. Aldemir A., and Binici B., 2017. Seismic Performance evaluation of concrete gravity dams by using pseudo dynamic testing and simulations. Australian Earthquake Engineering Society Conference. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.