Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 319, 2021
International Congress on Health Vigilance (VIGISAN 2021)
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131901020
Published online 09 November 2021
  1. K. M. W.-R. Paul E. Christian, Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, 7th Editio. Mosby, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. P. James E. Carey, Patrick Byrne, Larry DeWerd, Ralph Lieto, “The Selection , Use , Calibration , and Quality Assurance of Radionuclide Calibrators,” 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. R. Correia et al., “Volume corrections factors in the measurement of 99mTc and 123I activities in radionuclide calibrators,” Radiol. Bras., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2012, doi: 10.1590/s0100-39842012000200006. [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Strigari et al., “Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements,” J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2008, doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-14. [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Olšovcová and M. Havelka, “Monte Carlo calculations of calibration and geometry correction factors of a radionuclide calibrator,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 64, no. 10–11, pp. 1370–1374, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.02.047. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Ceccatelli et al., “Experimental determination of calibration settings of a commercially available radionuclide calibrator for various clinical measurement geometries and radionuclides,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 120–125, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.06.009. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Bauwens et al., “A comparison of four radionuclide dose calibrators using various radionuclides and measurement geometries clinically used in nuclear medicine,” Phys. Medica, vol. 60, pp. 14–21, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.012. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Sharma, B. Singh, A. Koul, and B. R. Mittal, “Deviation in the predefined calibration factors of the dose calibrators and the associated inaccuracy in the radioactivity measurements of beta-gamma emitters,” Indian J. Nucl. Med., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 122–127, 2015, doi: 10.4103/0972-3919.152972. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. F. Valley, S. Bulling, M. Leresche, and C. Wastiel, “Determination of the efficiency of commercially available dose calibrators for beta-emitters.,” J. Nucl. Med. Technol., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. A. M. Santos, M. F. Carrasco, J. Lencart, and A. L. Bastos, “Syringe shape and positioning relative to efficiency volume inside dose calibrators and its role in nuclear medicine quality assurance programs,” Appl. Radiat. Isot., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1104–1109, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.01.084. [Google Scholar]
  11. International Commission on Radiological Protection, “RADIATION PROTECTION PUBLISHED FOR The International Commission on Radiological Protection BY PERGAMON PRESS OXFORD · NEW YORK · TORONTO · SYDNEY · FRANKFURT,” 1977. [Google Scholar]
  12. D. L. Bailey, J. L. Humm, A. Todd-Pokropek, and A. van Aswegen, “Nuclear Medicine Physics. A Handbook for Teachers and Students.,” Med. Phys., vol. 38, no. 8, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. International Atomic Energy Agency, QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENT IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE. IAEA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Cea, “Guide d ’utilisation et de contrôle qualité des activimètres,” 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. COMERCER, VDC-606 manual. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. F. Gadd R, Baker M, Nijran KS, Owens S, Thomas W, Woods MJ, “Protocol for Establishing and Maintaining the Calibration of Medical Radionuclide Calibrators and their Quality Control Guide No. 93,” 2006. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.