Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 340, 2022
The 13th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 13th AIWEST-DR 2021)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Technology and Infrastructure for Disaster Risk Reduction
Published online 25 January 2022
  1. Bappenas and International Community, Indonesia: Preliminary Damage and Loss Assessment; The December 26, 2004, Natural Disaster, (Bappenas, Indonesia, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. S. Nasional, Standar Nasional Indonesia 1726-2019: Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung (BSN, Jakarta, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. B. S. Nasional, Standar Nasional Indonesia 1727-2020: Beban Desain Minimum dan Kriteria Terkait untuk Perancangan Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain (BSN, Jakarta, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Gentile, et al., From Rapid Visual Survey to Multi-Hazard Risk Prioritisation and Numerical Fragility of School Buildings, NHESS, 19: 1365–1386 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Vamvatsikos, and C. A. Cornell, Incremental Dynamic Analysis, EESD, 27(3): 97–125 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Karafagka, S. Fotopoulou, and K. Pitilakis, Analytical Tsunami Fragility Curves for Seaport RC Buildings and Steel Light-Frame Warehouses, SDEE, 112: 118–137 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. Pusat Studi Gempa Nasional, Peta Sumber dan Bahaya Gempa Indonesia Tahun 2017 (Kementerian PUPR, Bandung, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG) Data Base, Accesed on 25 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Kalkan, dan A. K. Chopra, Practical Guidelines to Select and Scale Earthquake Records for Nonlinear Response History Analysis of Structures (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, London, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Iemura, et al., Information Dissemination for Reality-Based Tsunami Disaster Education, Presented on The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Beijing, China, 12-17 October 2008) [Google Scholar]
  11. Tursina, and Syamsidik, Reconstruction of the 2004 Tsunami Inundation Map in Banda Aceh Through Numerical Model and Its Validation with Post-Tsunami Survey Data, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 273 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Tiwari, and A. Kasnale, Incremental Dynamic Analysis of RC Frames, IRJET, 4(6): 697–700 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Pitilakis, et al., SYNER-G : Typology Definition and Fragility Functions for Physical Elements at Seismic Risk, (Springer, Netherlands, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Sadraddin, Fragility Assessment of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings, (Civil and Construction Engineering Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Medina, et al., Tsunami Analytical Fragility Curves for The Colombian Pacific Coast: A Reinforced Concrete Building Example, ES, 196 (2019) 109309. [Google Scholar]
  16. FEMA, Direct Physical Damage-General Building Stock, (HAZUS-MH Technical manual, Chapter 5, Washington D.C., 2004) [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Rusydy, et al., Shallow Crustal Earthquake Models, Damage, and Loss Predictions in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, GD, 7: 8 (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.