Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 342, 2022
Journées Scientifiques AGAP Qualité 2022
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Géophysique et environnement
Published online 18 March 2022
  1. A. E. Hooper, H. N. H. Hambric, Unexploded ordnance (UXO): the problem, in Detection and Identification of Visually Obscured Targets, Routledge, 1-8 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  2. AGAP Qualité, Fiche MAG02-Magnétométrie Fluxgate, Fiches de bonne pratique, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Milsom, Field Geophysics, Third Edition, Wiley, 51-70 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Gavazzi, P. Le Maire, J. Mercier de Lépinay, P. Calou, M. Munschy, Fluxgate three-component magnetometers for cost-effective ground, UAV and airborne magnetic surveys for industrial and academic geoscience applications and comparison with current industrial standards through case studies, GETE, 20, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Walter, A. Braun, G. Fotopoulos, Spectral Analysis of Magnetometer Swing in High-Resolution UAV-borne Aeromagnetic Surveys, IEEE (STRATUS), 1-4, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Le Maire, L. Bertrand, M. Munschy, M. Diraison, Y. Géraud, Aerial magnetic mapping with an unmanned aerial vehicle and a fluxgate magnetometer: A new method for rapid mapping and upscaling from the field to regional scale, Geophysical Prospecting, 68(7), 2307-2319, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Mercier de Lépinay, T. Fréville, B. Gavazzi, B. Kiemes, L. M. Sanabria, M. Munschy, H. Reiller, A versatile solution for high-quality UA Vfluxgate magnetic acquisitions, Firstbreak, 39(8), 57-62 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. L. E. Tuck, C. Samson, J. Laliberté, M. Cunningham, Magnetic interference mapping offour types of unmanned aircraft systems intended for aeromagnetic surveying, Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 10(1), 101-112, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Munschy, D. Boulanger, P. Ulrich, M. Bouiflane, Magnetic mapping for the detection and characterization of UXO: Use of multi-sensor fluxgate 3-axis magnetometers and methods of interpretation, J. Appl. Geophys., 61(3-4), 168-183 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Bronner, M. Munschy, D. Sauter, J. Carlut, R. Searle, A. Maineult, Deep-tow 3C magnetic measurement: Solutions for calibration and interpretation, Geophysics, 78(3), J15-J23 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Walter, A. Braun, G. Fotopoulos, Characterizing electromagnetic interference signals for unmanned aerial vehicle geophysical surveys, Geophysics, 86(6), J21-J32 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. B. Reid, Aeromagnetic survey design, Geophysics, 45(5), 973-976 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. A. Keim, A. Herrmann, The gridfit algorithm: An efficient and effective approach to visualizing large amounts of spatial data, in Proceedings Visualization ‘98 (Cat. No.98CB36276), 181-188, IEEE (1998) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.