Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 346, 2022
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 15
Section Thème 3. Solutions innovantes dans l'usage des réservoirs / Theme 3. Innovative Solutions in Reservoir Uses
Published online 23 May 2022
  1. Treaty between the United States of America and Mexico relating to the waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers, and of the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo) from Fort Quitman, Texas, to the Gulf of Mexico, signed at Washington on 3 February (1944) [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Turan, “The Water Dimension in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Turkey’s water policy: National Frameworks and International Cooperation, 181 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Everard, The hydropolitics of dams: engineering or ecosystems?, Zed Books Ltd., 24 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. Ibid, 8-9 [Google Scholar]
  5. World Conflict Chronology, Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, Oregon State University,, Accessed September 30, 2020 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. McCracken, A.T. Wolf, “Updating the register of international river basins of the world”, International Journal of Water Resources Development (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. Convention on the Protection and Use Of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes, Helsinki, 17 March (1992) [Google Scholar]
  9. Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses, New York, 21 May (1997) [Google Scholar]
  10. UNESCO, Water-related vision for the Aral Sea Basin for the year 2025, 49 (2000), Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. C. McCaffrey, “Some Developments in the Law of International Watercourses”, Promoting Justice, Human Rights and Conflict Resolution through International Law, 787 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Wolf, Allocations in Practice: What happens in the room, in Global Workshop on Water Allocation, 16-17 October 2017, Geneva, Switzerland (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. Transboundary Water Allocation Handbook,, Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. Doosti dam (Iran-Turkmenistan Frendship Dam), J. Vatanfada, C. H. Mesgari Doosti Dam Progress on Water Cooperation, 9-10 April 2014 Geneva-Switzerland (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. Treaty relating to cooperative development of the water resources of the Columbia River Basin, 17 January (1961) [Google Scholar]
  16. The Effects of Climate Change,, Accessed September 25 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. Water Basins in Africa can be given as example, J. Anders, “Transboundary water management-why it is important and why it needs to be developed”, Free FlowReaching Water Security through Cooperation; UNESCO: Paris, France, 49–52 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Sood, et al., Global environmental flow information for the sustainable development goals, International Water Management Institute Research report 168, 1 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. The Brisbane Declaration: Environmental Flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being, Declaration of the 10th International Riversymposium and International Environmental Flows Conference, Brisbane, Australia (2007) [Google Scholar]
  20. Agreement on the cooperation for the sustainable development of the Mekong River Basin, Mekong River Commission (1995) [Google Scholar]
  21. Minute 319 Colorado River Limithrophe and Delta Environmental Flows Monitoring Final Report, November 28 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  22. International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico,, Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration (Pakistan vs. India), Final Award, The Hague, 20 December 2013, PCA Award Series, Record of Proceedings (2010-2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. Ibid, paragraphs 54-70 and 97-104 (2010- 2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Speed et al., Basin water allocation planning: Principles, Procedures and approaches for basin allocation planning, 58–62 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. World Meteorological Organization, Guidance on Environmental Flows: Integrating Eflow Science with Fluvial Geomorphology to Maintain Ecosystem Services, 10 (2019), Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  27. The rules on the procedures and principles for signing the right to use water agreement to make production work in the electricity markets, Article 15, translated by the author [Google Scholar]
  28. I. P. Dujmovic, WWF Adria, Application of environmental flows in the region, Expert Group on Flow Regulation and Environmental Flows (11-12 June 2019), June Zagreb/5 Implementation of e-flow in the region WWF Adria.pdf, Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  29. The Global Environmental Flow Information system, International Water Management Institute (IWMI),, Accessed September 30 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  30. A. J. Kirschener, K. Tiroch, The Waters of Euphrates and Tigris: An International Law Perspective, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 16(1), 339–340 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  31. Ibid, p. 347–348 [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Bozkurt, and O. L. Sen., Climate change impacts in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin based on different model and scenario simulations, Journal of hydrology, 480,149–161 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Scheumann, et al., “Environmental Impact Assessment in Turkish Dam Planning”, Turkey’s water policy: National Frameworks and International Cooperation, 150 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  34. Law No. 14 of 1990, ratifying the Joint Minutes concerning the provisional division of the waters of the Euphrates River [Google Scholar]
  35. Ö. Türk, N. Türk, Firat-Dicle Havzasi Sularinin Uluslararasi Hukuk Yasalari Çerçevesinde Degerlendirilmesi, Presented in Workshop of Water and Environment (SUCEV), 22-24 March 2018, Bursa, Turkey (2018) [Google Scholar]
  36. Devlet Su Îçleri (DSi), Turkey Water Report. DSi, Ankara (2009) [Google Scholar]
  37. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, and Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Inventory of shared water resources in Western Asia. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, XX, measured at Jarabolus (2013) [Google Scholar]
  38. Ibid, XX, measured at Mosul (2013) [Google Scholar]
  39. This amount is provided by Turkey as 15.6 BCM/year which is equal to 500 m3/sec [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Kut, Burning waters: the hydropolitics of the Euphrates and Tigris, New Perspectives on Turkey, 9(3),10(1993); Inventory of shared water resources in Western, 121 [Google Scholar]
  41. Agreement between the Republic of the Sudan and the United Arab Republic for the full utilization of the Nile waters, signed at Cairo, 8 November (1959) [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Kimenyi, and J. Mbaku, Governing the Nile River basin: The search for a new legal regime. Brookings Institution Press, 58–59 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  43. J. A. Allan, “Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible”, Priorities for water resources allocation and management, 13(4), 26, (1993); J. A. Allan, “Virtual Water: A Strategic Resource, Global Solutions to Regional Deficits”, Groundwater, 36, 545–546 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  44. E. B. Weiss, L. Slobodian, “Virtual Water, Water Scarcity, and International Trade Law”, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4), 719 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  45. The Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Turkey and the Government of the Republic of Bulgaria on Assistance and Cooperation in the Field of Water for Reducing the Negative Effects of the Drought of 1993 [Google Scholar]
  46. A. Kibaroglu, W. Scheumann, A. Kramer, Turkey’s Water Policy: National Frameworks and International Cooperation, Annex 5, 354–355 Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.