EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 359 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 359 (2022) 03001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 359, 2022
The 7th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2022)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Language and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235903001
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. T. Wiratno, “The Meaning of metafunctional scientific Text in Indonesian in scientific journals: A functional systemic analysis,” Universitas Sebelah Maret, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. A. K. Halliday and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. London: Hodder-Arnold, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. R Martin and D. Rose, Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. K. Halliday, “Things and Relations: Regrammaticizing Experience as Technical Knowledge,” in Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, J. R Martin and R. Veel, Eds. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 185–235. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. A. K Halliday and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. Oxon: Routledge, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. A. K. Halliday, An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Eggins, An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Emilia, Introducing Functional Grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Holtz, “Lexico-grammatical properties of abstracts and research articles. A corpus-based study of scientific discourse from multiple disciplines,” Technische Universität, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Raeisi, H. V. Dastjerdi, and M. Raeisi, “Lexico-grammatical Analysis of Native and Nonnative Abstracts Based on Halliday’s SFL Model,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1388–1395, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Zhou, “A theme-based text analysis of an academic abstract in English and Chinese,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 780–786, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. A. Leong, “Thematic density of research-article abstracts: a systemic-functional account,” WORD, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 209–227, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Machin and A. Mayr, How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  14. R. O Maledo and J. U. Edhere, “Experiential Metafunction: Representing Environmental Degradation,” Linguist. Cult. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 129–145, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Hanafiah, M. Yusuf, and A. Aswani, “Theme Markedness in EFL Students’ Recount Texts: A Systemic Functional Analysis,” SALTeL J. (Southeast Asia Lang. Teach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Gxowa-Dlayedwa, “Identifying unmarked topical thematic patterns: Evidence from spoken and written isiXhosa texts,” South African J. African Lang., vol. 33, no. 2, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. S. Alotaibi, “The thematic structure in research article abstracts: Variations across disciplines,” COGENT Arts Humanit., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Davies, “From writer roles to elements of text: interactive, organisational and topical,” in Reflections on language learning, L. Barbara and M. Scott, Eds. Clevendon, 1994, pp. 170–183. [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Hasselgård, “The role of multiple themes in cohesion,” in Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, K. Aijmer and A.-B. Stenström, Eds. Benjamins, 2004, pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Forey, “Aspects of Theme and their role in workplace texts,” University of Glaslow, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. T Rezayi and H. Moghani, “The Status of Theme Types and Thematic Progression Patterns in English Written Biography Texts: A Systemic Functional Approach,” Linguist. J., vol. 12, no. 1, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. R. Martin, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, and C. Painter, Working with Functional Grammar. New York: Arnold, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Rajab Dorri, “Textual metafunction and translation: A systemic functional linguistic perspective,” Appl. Linguisics Res. Journa, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 30–40, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Lin, “Discourse Functions of Marked Theme and the Narrative Nature of Chinese EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing,” in Proceedings of RSU Research Conference, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. He, “A Review on Studies of Theme in Academic Writing,” J. Contemp. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 25–35, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Navarro, “The language of educational linguistics in Hispanic Latin America: Choices of Theme in an emerging field,” Lang. Context Text Soc. Semiot. Forum, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 121–147, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Khedri, “The importance of thematic structure in students’ writing cohesion,” Lang. India, vol. 12, no. 4 April 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. V. To, “Linguistic complexity analysis: A case study of commonly-used textbooks in Vietnam,” SAGE Open, no. 2018, pp. 1–13, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. A. K. Halliday, Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. A. K Halliday and J. R. Martin, Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Palmer, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Rojas Garcia, “Textual Metafunction: A Basis for Academic Literacy in Constitutional Law,” Íkala, Rev. Leng. y Cult., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 167–182, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. R. Martin, “Theme, method of development in existentiality: the price of reply,” Occas. Pap. Syst. Linguist., vol. 6, pp. 147–184, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  33. L. V. Bartley, “Putting transitivity to the test: a review of the Sydney and Cardiff models,” Funct. Linguist, vol. 5, no. 4, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.