EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 363 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 363 (2022) 04028 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2022
XV International Scientific Conference on Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Machinery Industry “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2022”
Article Number 04028
Number of page(s) 12
Section Environmental Education and Digital Solutions. Environmentally Responsible Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236304028
Published online 14 December 2022
  1. Alexandrov Yu.I., Kirdina S.G. Types of mentality and institutional matrices: a multidisciplinary approach // Sociological research. 2012. V. 38. P. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ivanovich V. V., Znakova V. V., Alexandrov Yu. I. Approval of the Russian-language version of analytical-holistic scale. Psychological Journal, 2017, Volume 38, No. 5, pp. 80–96. DOI:10.7868/S0205959217050075 [Google Scholar]
  3. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87–111. DOI:10.2190/DVWX-GM1T-6THQ-5WC7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Belousova, A. Functions of participants in the collaborative solution of thinking problems International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science,Engineering and Education 2020 8(Special Issue 1), pp. 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, C. K., Pare, D. E., Collimore, L. M., & Joordens, S. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance. Computers and Education, 56 (1), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.024 [Google Scholar]
  7. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 2(2–3): 87–105. DOI:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Garrison, D., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer and Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Derner D. Logic of failure. Moscow: Sense, 1997. https://www.koob.ru/derner/logika_neudachi [Google Scholar]
  10. Epstein S., Pacini R., Denes-Raj V., Heler H. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(2), 390–405. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, R. A., Farchione, D., Hughes, D. L., & Chan, S. (2014). Participation in asynchronous online discussion forums does improve student learning of gross anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7, 71–76. DOI:10.1002/ase.1376 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education 11(3):8–26. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ567749 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris, N. & Sandor, M. (2007). Developing online discussion forums as student centred peer e-learning environments. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/29466076_Developing_online_discussion_forums_as_student_centred_peer_e-learning_environments [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M. E., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011). Open, aware, and active: Contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world // Behavioral and brain sciences. 2010. V. 33. P. 61–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnco C., Wuthrich V.M., Rapee R.M. The influence of cognitive flexibility on treatment outcome and cognitive restructuring skill acquisition during cognitive behavioral treatment for anxiety and depression in older adults: results of a pilot study // Behaviour research and therapy. 2014. V. 57. P. 55–64. DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kahneman D. Think slowly … decide quickly. Moscow: AST, 2013. https://ast.ru/book/dumay-medlenno-reshay-bystro–130217/ [Google Scholar]
  18. Kornilova T.V. Intellectual and personal potential of a person in conditions of uncertainty and risk. St. Petersburg:Nestor-History, 2016. 344 with a. http://i.uran.ru/webcab/books/intellektualno-lichnostnyy-potencial-cheloveka-v-usloviyah-neopredelennosti-i-riska [Google Scholar]
  19. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A., Kornilov S.A., Novikova M.A. Psychology of uncertainty: unity of intellectual and personal potential of a person. M.: Sense, 2010. 334 p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kornilova T.V., Kornilov S.A. Intuition, intelligence and personal properties (results of approbation of scales of S. Epstein’s questionnaire). Psychological research, 2013, 6(28), 5. http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2013v6n28/804-corniliva28.html [Google Scholar]
  21. Kornilova T.V., Razvaliaeva A. U. The rationality and intuition scales in S. epstein’s questionnaire rei (Russian approval of the full version) // Psychological Journal, 2017, volume 38, No. 3, pp. 92–107. DOI:10.7868/S0205959217030084 [Google Scholar]
  22. Korochentseva A., Terekhin Vy. Teachers’ ideas about their appearance and features of non-verbal communication with pupils during the distance learning. E3S Web Conf. Volume 258, 07080 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807080 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kurginyan S.S., Osavolyuk E.Yu. The cognitive flexibility inventory (cfi): adaptation for russian-speaking sampling. Psychological Journal volume 39 No. 2 2018. pp. 105–119. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329222648_The_cognitive_flexibility_inventory_CFI_Adaptation_for_Russian-speaking_sampling [Google Scholar]
  24. Lupu Costică The contribution of the new technologies to learning mathematics Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 128 (2014) 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.150 [Google Scholar]
  25. Manlove, S. A., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of computer assisted learning, 22(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00162.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Marra, R. M., Moore, J.L. and Klimczak, A.K. (2004). “Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols” ETR&D, Vol. 52, No. 2 Pp. 23–40. DOI:10.1007/BF02504837 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nandi, D., Chang, S., & Balbo, S. (2009). A conceptual framework for assessing interaction quality in online discussion forums, In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings Ascilite Auckland 2009. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-conceptual-framework-for-assessing-interaction-in-Nandi-Chang/117a865f57fe981512f506acdfa1bec9dc94fa17 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nisbett R.E., Peng K., Choi I., & Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological review. 2001. P. 108, 291–310. DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291 [Google Scholar]
  29. Rende B. Cognitive flexibility: Theory, assessment, and treatment // Seminars in speech and language. 2000. V. 21. № 2. P. 121–133. DOI:10.1055/s-2000-7560 [Google Scholar]
  30. Romero, C., López, M., Luna, J., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students’ final performance from participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 68,458–472. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Suroedova E.A. The role of verbal and nonverbal means of meaning transmission in the process of solving professional tasks by students. Dissertation … Candidate of Psychological Sciences. Rostov-on-Don, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  32. Suroedova El., Tushnova Yu., Belousova E. Agriculture faculty students’ means translation in conditions of the development of communicative competence E3S Web of Conferences 175, 15028 (2020) INTERAGROMASH 2020 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017515028 [Google Scholar]
  33. Signs V.V. Analyticity and holism in the views of A.V. Brushlinsky and O.K. Tikhomirov // Questions of psychology. 2013. № 4. P. 135–146. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.