Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 465, 2023
8th International Conference on Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering (ICIMECE 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02047 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Symposium on Electrical, Information Technology, and Industrial Engineering | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346502047 | |
Published online | 18 December 2023 |
- N. F. Pangestu, A. F. A. Zahra, and S. Sutrisno, “Penerapan Metode Critical Parth Method (CPM) dalam Proyek Pembangunan Jembatan Alun-Alun Kota Kuningan,” J. Ind. Manuf. Eng., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 2021, doi: 10.31289/jime.v5i2.4925. [Google Scholar]
- M. Z. Fareed, Q. Su, and A. A. Awan, “The effect of emotional intelligence, intellectual intelligence and transformational leadership on project success; an empirical study of public projects of Pakistan,” Proj. Leadersh. Soc., vol. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.plas.2021.100036. [Google Scholar]
- L. Lalitadevi, J. Gunawan, and N. Nareswari, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan dari Perspektif Pemilik UMKM terhadap Turnover Karyawan,” J. Sains dan Seni ITS, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 305–309, 2020, doi: 10.12962/j23373520.v8i2.48070. [Google Scholar]
- Sanusi et al., “Develop Leadership Style Model for Indonesian SMEs Leaders During Covid-19 Pandemic,” Syst. Rev. Pharm., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 576–586, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- I. Ainanur, “Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja SDM Konstruksi,” J. Mhs. Tek. Sipil Univ. Tanjungpura, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/192548-ID-pengaruh-gaya-kepemimpinan-terhadapkine.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- A. Sulistyawan, “Pengaruh Kinerja Tim Proyek Terhadap Keberhasilan Proyek,” J. Din. Tek. SIPIL, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- T. D. Sutanto and S. D. Hartantyo, “View of Observasi Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Pekerja Pada Proyek Preservasi Rekonstruksi Jalan Surabaya-Gresik-Sadang.pdf,” J. Tek., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.37031/jt.v18i1.67. [Google Scholar]
- N. P. Pramesti, “Hubungan Gaya Kepemimpinan Manajer Proyek, Kepercayaan dan Keberhasilan Proyek KOnstruksi,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 128–136, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- A. A. Tabassi, K. M. Roufechaei, M. Ramli, A. H. A. Bakar, R. Ismail, and A. H. K. Pakir, “Leadership competences of sustainable construction project managers,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 124, pp. 339–349, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.076. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Maqbool, Y. Sudong, N. Manzoor, and Y. Rashid, “The Impact of Emotional Intelligence, Project Managers’ Competencies, and Transformational Leadership on Project Success: An Empirical Perspective,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 58– 75, 2017, doi: 10.1177/875697281704800304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. E. Papke-Shields, C. Beise, and J. Quan, “Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 650–662, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Davis, “Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 189–201, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Levstek, T. Hovelja, and A. Pucihar, “IT Governance Mechanisms and Contingency Factors: Towards an Adaptive IT Governance Model,” Organizacija, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 286–310, 2018, doi: 10.2478/orga-2018-0024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Nakano and J. Muniz, “Writing the literature review for empirical papers,” Production, vol. 28, 2018, doi: 10.1590/0103-6513.20170086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Vom Brocke, A. Simons, B. Niehaves, K. Riemer, R. Plattfaut, and A. Cleven, “Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process,” 17th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst. ECIS 2009, no. December 2013, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- M. Radujković and M. Sjekavica, “Project Management Success Factors,” Procedia Eng., vol. 196, no. June, pp. 607–615, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Sukindrawati and W. Kartika, “Kepemimpinan manajer Proyek Berperan Terhdap Keberhasilan Proyek,” J. Ranc. Bangun Tek. Sipil, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- G. Kismono and D. S. Pranabella, “the Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relationship Between Benevolent Leadership and Well-Being in the Context of Employees With Disabilities,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 149–171, 2021, doi: 10.22146/jlo.68003. [Google Scholar]
- A. M. Khan and A. hamzah Bin Jantan, “Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relationship between Transactional Leadership and Individual Innovation: Evidence from Banking Sector of Bangladesh,” J. Int. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.37227/jibm-2022-09-5488/. [Google Scholar]
- S. Ur Rehman, A. Bhatti, and N. I. Chaudhry, “Mediating effect of innovative culture and organizational learning between leadership styles at third-order and organizational performance in Malaysian SMEs,” J. Glob. Entrep. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40497-019-0159-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Franco and P. G. Matos, “Leadership styles in SMEs: a mixed-method approach,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 425–451, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11365-013-0283-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Sarros and J. C. Santora, “The transformationaltransactional leadership model in practice,” Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 383–394, 2001, doi: 10.1108/01437730110410107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Asbari, A. Purwanto, and P. Budi, “Pengaruh Iklim Organisasi dan Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Inovatif Pada Industri Manufaktur di Pati Jawa Tengah,” J. Produkt., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2020, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29406/jpr.v7i1.1797. [Google Scholar]
- A. Bakhtiar and B. Purwanggono, “Analisis Implemenntasi Sistem Manajemen Kualitas Iso 9001 : 2000 Dengan Menggunakan Gap Analysis Tools,” J@ti Undip J. Tek. Ind., vol. IV, no. 3, pp. 163–170, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- P. Sanita, “Analisis Penerapan Sanitation Standard Operating Procedure (SSOP) dan Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Pada Produksi Nata de Coco di PT. Daya Agro Mitra Mandiri, JombangCiputat, Kota Tangerang Selatan,” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Susanto, M. Suef, and P. D. Karningsih, “Level of Implementation of GMP and SSOP in SMEs Wet Noodle Production Process with Gap Analysis Tools,” Evergreen, vol. 10, no. 01, pp. 510–518, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Elwardi, A. Meddaoui, A. Mouchtachi, and A. EnNhaili, “Towards a LSRO model of industrial performance improvement: A case study of LSRO model implementation in an industrial SME,” Int. J. Process Manag. Benchmarking, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 584–600, 2021, doi: 10.1504/IJPMB.2021.116628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B. Elwardi, A. Meddaoui, A. Mouchtachi, and A. Ennhaili, “Towards a new maturity model of industrial performance improvement based on ISO 9001: Version 2015 and VDA6.3: Version 2016,” Int. J. Process Manag. Benchmarking, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 367–389, 2021, doi: 10.1504/IJPMB.2021.115013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Susanto, M. Suef, and P. D. Karningsih, “Effectiveness of hazard control through HACCP critical control points in the wet noodle production process on product quality,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Eff., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.6703/IJASE.202206_19(2).001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. S. Oliveira, J. E. Corrêa, P. P. Balestrassi, R. A. Martins, and J. B. Turrioni, “Investigation of TQM implementation: empirical study in Brazilian ISO 9001-registered SMEs,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 30, no. 5–6, pp. 641–659, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2017.1328273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Susanto, “Implementation of Standards in International Trade: Benefit or Barrier? A Case Study from Indonesia,” Evergreen, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 619– 628, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.