Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 382, 2023
8th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (UNSAT 2023)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Cyclic & Dynamic Behavior of Unsaturated Soils
Published online 24 April 2023
  1. J.P. Stewart, P.M. Smith, D.H. Whang, J.D. Bray. Seismic compression of two compacted earth fills shaken by the 1994 Northridge earthquake. J. of Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., 130(5), 461-476, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.P. Stewart, S.W. Chang, J.D. Bray, R.B. Seed, N. Sitar, M.F. Riemer, A report on geotechnical aspects of the January 17, 1994 Northridge earthquake. Seismological Research Letters. 66(3), 7-19. 1995. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J.P. Stewart, J.D. Bray, D.J. McMahon, P.M. Smith, A.L. Kropp, Seismic performance of hillside fills. J. of Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., 127(11), 905-919, 2001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Yee, J.P. Stewart, K. Tokimatsu, K. Nonlinear site response and seismic compression at vertical array strongly shaken by 2007 Niigata-ken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake. PEER Report 2011/107, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Ghayoomi, J.S. McCartney, H.Y. Ko, Empirical methodology to estimate seismically induced settlement of partially saturated sand. J. of Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., 139(3), 367-376, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Ghayoomi, J.S. McCartney, H.Y. Ko, Centrifuge test to assess the seismic compression of partially saturated sand layers. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34(4), 321-331, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Rong, J.S. McCartney, J.S. Drained seismic compression of unsaturated sand, J. of Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., 146(5), 04020029, 2020a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Rong, J.S. McCartney, J.S. Undrained seismic compression of unsaturated sand. J. of Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., 47(1), 04020145, 2020b. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Beaty, P.M. Byrne, An effective stress model for predicting liquefaction behavior of sand. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III. ASCE, Reston, VA. 766-777, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Puebla, P.M. Byrne, R. Phillips, Analysis of CANLEX liquefaction embankments: prototype and centrifuge models. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34(5), 641-657, 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. B.O. Hardin, W. Black, Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. ASCE, 94(2), 353-389, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Lu, J.W. Godt, D.T. Wu, A closed form equation for effective stress in unsaturated soil. Water Resources Research, 46(5), 55-65, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Naesgaard, A Hybrid Effective Stress-Total Stress Procedure for Analyzing Soil Embankment Subjected to Potential Liquefaction and Flooding. Doctoral Dissertation. UBC. 1-213, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Kinikles, J.S. McCartney, Constitutive Model for the Seismic Compression of Unsaturated Soils in the Funicular Regime. PEER Report 2022/05. 123 pg., 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Seid-Karbasi, P.M. Byrne, Effects of partial saturation on liquefiable ground response. GeoCongress 2007. ASCE, 1-6, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Unno, M. Kazama, R. Uzuoka, N. Sento, Liquefaction of unsaturated sand considering the pore air pressure and volume compressibility of the soil particle skeleton. Soils Found., 48(1), 87-99, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. T.L. Youd, Compaction of sands by repeated shear straining. J.S.M.F.D., 98(SM7), 709-725, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Zheng, A.C Sander, W. Rong, P.J. Fox, P.J., P.B. Shing, J.S. McCartney, Shaking table test of a half-scale geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutment. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 41(1), 171-192, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. M.T. van Genuchten, A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. SSS J., 44(5), 892-898, 1980. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.