EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 393 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 393 (2023) 02032 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 393, 2023
2023 5th International Conference on Environmental Prevention and Pollution Control Technologies (EPPCT 2023)
Article Number 02032
Number of page(s) 5
Section Ecological Protection and Sustainable Development Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339302032
Published online 02 June 2023
  1. Schipper, L., Bartlett, S., Hawk, D., Vine, E. (1989). Linking life-styles and energy use: a matter of time? Annual review of energy, 14(1), 273-320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.eg.14.110189.00142 1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Testa, F., Pretner, G., Iovino, R., Bianchi, G., Tessitore, S., Iraldo, F. (2021). Drivers to green consumption: A systematic review. Environment, development and sustainability, 23, 4826-4880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00844-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, C., Wang, Q., Feng, T., Zhang, Y. (2021). The influence of service category, consumers’ narcissism and processing mode on service customization consumption, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 33(7), 1556-1577. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2020-0263 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali, M., Ullah, S., Ahmad, M. S., Cheok, M. Y., Alenezi, H. (2022). Assessing the impact of green consumption behavior and green purchase intension among millennials toward sustainable environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23811-1 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding, Z., Jiang, X., Liu, Z., Long, R., Xu, Z., Cao, Q. (2018). Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: A comprehensive review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Geng, N., Liu, Z., Han, X., Zhang, X. (2022). Influencing Factors and Group Differences of Urban Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010358 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lei, M., Cai, W., Liu, W., Wang, C. (2022). The heterogeneity in energy consumption patterns and home appliance purchasing preferences across urban households in China. Energy, 253, 124079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124079 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pristl, A. C., Kilian, S., Mann, A. (2021). “When does a social norm catch the worm? Disentangling social normative influences on sustainable consumption behaviour”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 635-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1890 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Verplanken, B., Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(3), 434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wei, J., Chen, H., Long, R., Zhang, L., Feng, Q. (2020). Maturity of residents' low-carbon consumption and information intervention policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277(3), 124080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124080 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, H. W. (2019). Effect of low carbon economy on enterprise competitiveness: A multiple mediation model. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(4), 8793-8803. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_87938803 [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhong, S., Chen, J. (2019). How environmental beliefs affect consumer willingness to pay for the greenness premium of low-carbon agricultural products in China: theoretical model and survey-based evidence. Sustainability, 11(3), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030592 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Luo, B., Sun, Y., Shen, J., & Xia, L. (2020). How does green advertising skepticism on social media affect consumer intention to purchase green products? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(4), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1818 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Halder, P., Hansen, E. N., Kangas, J., & Laukkanen, T. (2020). How national culture and ethics matter in consumers’ green consumption values. Journal of cleaner production, 265, 121754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121754 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Valor, C., & Martínez - de - Ibarreta, C. (2021). Toward a personology of green consumers: An application of personal projects. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1901 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yan, L., Keh, H. T., & Wang, X. (2021). Powering sustainable consumption: The roles of green consumption values and power distance belief. Journal of Business Ethics, 169, 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04295-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khan, M. I., Khalid, S., Zaman, U., José, A. E., & Ferreira, P. (2021). Green Paradox in Emerging Tourism Supply Chains: Achieving Green Consumption Behavior through Strategic Green Marketing Orientation, Brand Social Responsibility, and Green Image. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9626. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189626 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gong, Y., Li, J., Xie, J., Zhang, L., & Lou, Q. (2022). Will “green” parents have “green” children? The relationship between parents’ and early adolescents’ green consumption values. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04835-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, H., Wang, L., Ou, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). How does goal framing effect influence household low-carbon behavior: The roles of environmental self-efficacy and global–local identity. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 2651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1035118 [Google Scholar]
  21. Wei, J., Zhang, L., Yang, R., & Song, M. (2023). A new perspective to promote sustainable low-carbon consumption: The influence of informational incentive and social influence. Journal of Environmental Management, 327, 116848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116848 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Franke, N., Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of product innovation management, 21(6), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00094.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Panzone, L. A., Ulph, A., Hilton, D., Gortemaker, I., Tajudeen, I. A. (2021). Sustainable by design: choice architecture and the carbon footprint of grocery shopping. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 40(4), 463-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156211008898 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Theotokis, A., Manganari, E. (2015). The impact of choice architecture on sustainable consumer behavior: The role of guilt. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2287-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.