Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 405, 2023
2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies in Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICSTCE 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03009 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Structural Engineering & Concrete Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340503009 | |
| Published online | 26 July 2023 | |
- L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353 (1965). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- W.R. Zhang, Bipolar fuzzy sets, Proceeding of FUZZ-IEEE, 835-840 (1998). [Google Scholar]
- M. Velasquez and P.T. Hester, An Analysis of Multi-criteria decision making methods, Int. J. Oper. Res, 10, 56-66 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- D. Daghouri, K. Mansouri and M. Qbadou, Multi criteria decision making methods for Information system selection: A comparative study, IEEE, 1-5 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- E.K. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, F. Peldschus and Z. Turskis, Multi-Attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method, The Balt. J. Road Bridge Eng, 2, 195-203 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- P. Pitchipoo, D.S. Vincent, N. Rajini and S. Rajakarunakaran, COPRAS decision model to optimize blind spot in heavy vehicles: A comparative perspective, Procedia Engineering, 97, 1049-1059 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Nourianfar and G.A. Montazer, A fuzzy MCDM approach based on COPRAS method to solve supplier selection problems, IEEE, 231-235 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- T. Parezanovic, N. Bojkovic, M. Petrovic and S.P. Tarle, Evaluation of substainable mobility measures using fuzzy COPRAS method, Journal of substainable business and management solutions in emerging economies, 21, 53-62 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- E.T. Bekar, M. Cakmakci and C. Kahraman, Fuzzy COPRAS method for performance measurement in total productive maintenance: A comparative analysis, J. Bus. Econ. Manag, 17, 663-684 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Rudnik, G. Bocewicz, A.K. Landwojtowicz and I.D.C. Gorska, Ordered fuzzy WASPAS method for selection of improvement projects, Expert system with application, 169, 1-18 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- S. Chakraborty, O. Bhattacharya, E.K. Zavadskas and J. Antucheviciene, Application of WASPAS method as an optimization tools in non-traditional machining processes, Information technology and control, 77-88 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- S.S. Goswami and D.K. Behera, Solving material handling equipment selection problems in an industry with the help of entropy integrated COPRAS and ARAS MCDM techniques, Process integrated and optimization for substainability, 1-27 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- A. S. Ajrina, R. Sarno and R.V.H. Ginardi, Comparison of MOORA and COPRAS methods based on geographic information system for determining potential zone of Pasir Batu mining, IEEE, 360-365 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- P. Dusan, M. Milos, R. Miroslav and J. Predrag, Application of recently developed MCDM methods for materials selection, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 1468-1473 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- M. Yardani, S. Zolfani and E.K. Zavadskas, New integration of McDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers, J. Bus. Econ. Manag, 17, 1097-1113. [Google Scholar]
- P. Kmiecik and M. Kaminski, Modelling of reinforced concrete structures and composite structures with concrete degradation taken into consideration, Archives of civil and mechanical engineering, 11, 2011, 623-636 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F.D. Larrard and T. Sedran, Mixture-proportioning of high-performance concrete, Cement and Concrete research, 32, 1699-1704 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.