EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 408 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 408 (2023) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 408, 2023
International Conference on Sustainable, Circular Management and Environmental Engineering (ISCMEE 2023)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340801005
Published online 02 August 2023
  1. United Nations. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. Aktas, E., Sahin, H., Topaloglu, Z., Oledinma, A., Huda, A. K. S., Irani, Z., Sharif, A. M., van’t Wout, T., & Kamrava, M. (2018). A consumer behavioural approach to food waste. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 31(5), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2018-0051 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schanes, K., Dobernig, K., & Gozet, B. (2018). Food waste matters—A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. J. Clean. Prod., 182, 978–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. dos Santos, J. I. A. S., da Silveira, D. S., da Costa, M. F., & Duarte, R. B. (2022). Consumer behaviour in relation to food waste: A systematic literature review. Br Food J., 124(14), 4420–4439. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-1075 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghaziani, S., Ghodsi, D., Schweikert, K., Dehbozorgi, G., Faghih, S., Mohabati, S., & Doluschitz, R. (2022). Household food waste quantification and cross-examining the official figures: A study on household wheat bread waste in Shiraz, Iran. Foods, 11(5), 1188. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091188 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Abeliotis, K., Lasaridi, K., & Chroni, C. (2014). Attitudes and behaviour of Greek households regarding food waste prevention. Waste Manag Res, 32(3), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X14521681 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stefan, V., van Herpen, E., Tudoran, A., & Lahteenmaki, L. (2013). Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Qual. Prefer., 28, 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Annunziata, A., Agovino, M., Ferraro, A., & Mariani, A. (2020). Household Food Waste: A Case Study in Southern Italy. Sustainability, 12(4), 1495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041495 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmidt, K. (2016). Explaining and promoting household food waste-prevention by an environmental psychological based intervention study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 111, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liao, C. H., Qiao, L. G., Wang, X. Z., & Lu, S. S. (2022). Exploring food waste prevention through advent food consumption: The role of perceived concern, consumer value, and impulse buying. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 6, 988260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.988260 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Seo, J. Y., & Yoon, S. (2022). Food waste perceptions: Vice versus virtue foods. J. Consum. Mark., 39(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2020-3997 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ankiel, M., & Samotyja, U. (2021). Consumer opinions on the causes of food waste — demographic and economic conditions. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, 42(4), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2021-0022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Annunziata, A., Agovino, M., Ferraro, A., & Mariani, A. (2021). Food waste as a consequence of an inefficient consumer’s choices: A microeconomic approach. Appl. Econ., 53(54), 6266–6285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1937503 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Aschemann-Witzel, J. (2018). Helping You to Waste Less? Consumer Acceptance of Food Marketing Offers Targeted to Food-Related Lifestyle Segments of Consumers. J. Food Prod. Mark., 24(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2018.1472693 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Amicarelli, V., & Bux, C. (2021). Food waste measurement toward a fair, healthy and environmental-friendly food system: A critical review. Br Food J., 123(8), 2907–2935. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0658 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brennan, L., Francis, C., Jenkins, E. L., Schivinski, B., Jackson, M., Florence, E., Parker, L., Langley, S., Lockrey, S., Verghese, K., et al. (2023). Consumer perceptions of food packaging in its role in fighting food waste. Sustainability, 15(3), 1917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031917 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Folharini, S., Vieira, A., Bento-Gonçalves, A., Silva, S., Marques, T., & Novais, J. (2023). Bibliometric analysis on wildfires and protected areas. Sustainability, 15(11), 8536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118536 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22, 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M. I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & López-Herrera, A. G. (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1077–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9565-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Della Corte, V., del Gaudio, G., Sepe, F., & Sciarelli, F. (2019). Sustainable tourism in the open innovation realm: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 11(22), 6114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hosseini, S., Baziyad, H., Norouzi, R., Khiabani, S. J., Gidófalvi, G., Albadvi, A., Alimohammadi, A., & Seyedabrishami, S. (2021). Mapping the intellectual structure of GIS-T field (2008-2019): A dynamic co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 126(4), 2667–2688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03840-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.