Open Access
Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 434, 2023
4th International Conference on Energetics, Civil and Agricultural Engineering (ICECAE 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02019 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
Section | Civil Engineering | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202343402019 | |
Published online | 12 October 2023 |
- H. Wang, E. M. Marino, P. Pan, H. Liu, and X. Nie, Experimental study of a novel precast prestressed reinforced concrete beam- to-column joint, Eng. Struct. 156, 20168–81 (2018) [Google Scholar]
- R. Park, Seismic Design and Construction of Precast Concrete Buildings in New Zealand, New Zealand (2002) [Google Scholar]
- Vivian, W., Y. Tam & Jane J.L. Hao, Prefabrication as a mean of minimizing construction waste on site, International Journal of Construction Management 14, 113–121 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Liu, Q. Yan, and X. Du, Seismic performance comparison between precast beam joints and cast-in-place beam joints, Advances in Structural Engineering 20, 1299–1314 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. O. Onur Ertas, Sevket Ozden, Ductile Connections in Precast, 66–76 (2006) [Google Scholar]
- P. Stylianidis, J. Bellos, Survey on the Role of Beam-Column Connections in the Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel Frame Buildings, Buildings 13, 1696 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Zhang, C. Ding, X. Rong, H. Yang, K. Wang, and B. Zhang, Experimental seismic study of precast hybrid SFC / RC beam - column connections with di ff erent connection details, Eng. Struct. 208, 110295 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. K. Bull and R. Park, “Seismic Resistance of Frames Incorporating Precast Prestressed Concrete Beam Shells,” 1986. [Google Scholar]
- A. I. Rather, A. R. Dar, and A. Fayeq, “Materials Today: Proceedings Improved performance of steel fibre reinforced beam-column jointan experimental study,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 32, pp. 982–988, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Jaillon and C. S. Poon, “Automation in Construction Life cycle design and prefabrication in buildings : A review and case studies in Hong Kong,” Autom. Constr., 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.006. [Google Scholar]
- H. H. Ghayeb, H. A. Razak, and N. H. R. Sulong, “Seismic performance of innovative hybrid precast reinforced concrete beam- to-column connections,” Eng. Struct., vol. 202, no. April 2019, p. 109886, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109886. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. Baran, M. Mahamid, M. Baran, M. Kurtoglu, and I. Torra-Bilal, “Performance of a moment resisting beamcolumn connection for precast concrete construction,” Eng. Struct., vol. 246, no. May 2020, p. 113005, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Zhang, C. Li, X. Rong, X. Zhang, and Y. Li, “Experimental study on the seismic performance of steel - concrete beam - column connections for prefabricated concrete frames,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 43, no. September, p. 103236, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. C. Kurama et al., “Seismic-Resistant Precast Concrete Structures : State of the Art,” vol. 144, no. CAE 1999, pp. 1–18, 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001972. [Google Scholar]
- SNI 2847, PENETAPAN STANDAR NASIONAL INDONESIA 2847: 2019 PERSYARATAN BETON STRUKTURAL UNTUK BANGUNAN GEDUNG DAN PENJELASAN SEBAGAI REVISI DARI STANDAR NASIONAL INDONESIA 2847: 2013, no. 8. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- J. Fan, G. Wu, D. Feng, Y. Zeng, and Y. Lu, “Seismic performance of a novel self-sustaining beam-column connection for precast concrete moment-resisting frames,” Eng. Struct., vol. 222, no. June, p. 111096, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111096. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ACI 374.2R-13, Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads. 2013. [Google Scholar]
- M. Ye, J. Jiang, H. M. Chen, H. Y. Zhou, and D. D. Song, “Seismic behavior of an innovative hybrid beamcolumn connection for precast concrete structures,” vol. 227, no. June 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111436. [Google Scholar]
- H. Choi, Y. Choi, and C. Choi, “Development and testing of precast concrete beam-to-column connections,” Eng. Struct., vol. 56, pp. 1820–1835, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.07.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. H. Ghayeb, H. A. Razak, and N. H. R. Sulong, “Development and testing of hybrid precast concrete beam-to- column connections under cyclic loading,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 151, pp. 258–278, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.073. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Pan, Q. Si, Z. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and X. Chen, “Experimental and numerical investigations of seismic performance of hybrid joints with bolted connections B-B End-plate C-C D-D,” vol. 138, pp. 867–876, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.001. [Google Scholar]
- Z. He and T. Zhong, “Development of a new hybrid precast beam-to- column connection Development of a new hybrid precast beam-to-column connection,” 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/431/11/112002. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Lu, J. Huang, S. Dai, J. Liu, and M. Zhang, “Experimental study on a precast beam-column joint with double grouted splice sleeves,” Eng. Struct., vol. 199, no. August, p. 109589, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109589. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Senturk, S. Pul, A. Ilki, and I. Hajirasouliha, “Development of a monolithic-like precast beam-column moment connection: Experimental and analytical investigation,” Eng. Struct., vol. 205, no. November 2019, p. 110057, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110057. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Krishnan and R. Purushothaman, “Effect of stiffeners in cleat angle based precast beam-column connections under reverse cyclic loading,” Structures, vol. 25, no. March, pp. 161–172, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Esmaeili and N. Ahooghalandary, “Introducing an easy-install precast concrete beam-to-column connection strengthened by steel box and peripheral plates,” Eng. Struct., vol. 205, no. December 2019, p. 110006, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- X. Rong, X. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “Seismic behavior of innovation steel-embedded precast concrete beam-to- column joints,” Structures, vol. 34, no. October, pp. 4952–4964, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Feng, D. Guan, Z. Guo, Z. Liu, G. Li, and C. Gong, “Seismic performance of assembly joints between HSPC beams and concrete-encased CFST columns,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 180, p. 106572, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106572. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Xie, J. Wu, J. Zhang, and C. Liu, “Experimental study of mechanical properties of beam-column joint of a replaceable energy-dissipation connector-precast concrete frame,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 43, no. April, p. 102588, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhang and D. Li, “Development and testing of precast concrete-filled square steel tube column-to-RC beam connections under cyclic loading,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 280, p. 122540, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Li, C. Wu, Y. Zhou, W. Luo, and W. Lie, “A precast beam-column connection using metallic damper as connector: Experiment and application,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 181, p. 106628, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Tong, J. Wu, M. D. Zakari, and Y. Gao, “Hysteretic behavior of a new precast concrete interior beam-to- column joint with a controllable bending moment,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 45, no. October 2021, p. 103557, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W. Huang, G. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Experimental study on the seismic performance of new precast concrete beamcolumn joints with replaceable connection,” Structures, vol. 35, no. December 2021, pp. 856–872, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.050. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. Torra-Bilal, M. Mahamid, and E. Baran, “Cyclic behaviour of precast beam-to-column connections: An experimental and numerical investigation,” Structures, vol. 35, no. June 2021, pp. 939–957, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.11.046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.