EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 440 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 440 (2023) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Smart Education University Learning Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344005005
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. P. P. Ray, “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope,” Internet Things Cyber-Physical Syst., vol. 3, pp. 121–154, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Javaid, A. Haleem, and R. P. Singh, “ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective,” BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks, Stand. Eval., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100105, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Marhamah and H. B. Hamzah, “The Relationship Between Social Support and Academic Stress Among First Year Students At Syiah Kuala University,” Psikoislamedia J. Psikol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 149–172, 2017, doi: 10.22373/psikoislamedia.v1i1.1487. [Google Scholar]
  4. V. S. Nandagaon and S. A. Raddi, “Depression and suicidal ideation as a consequence of academic stress among adolescent students,” Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 4464–4468, 2020, doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12344. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Ruiz-Robledillo, J. Vela-Bermejo, V. Clement-Carbonell, R. Ferrer-Cascales, C. Alcocer-Bruno, and N. Albaladejo-Blázquez, “Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Academic Stress and Perceived Classroom Climate in Spanish University Students,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Tripathi, Niharika, and A. A. Khan, “Study on academics and stress during Covid-19 outbreak,” Indian J. Ecol., vol. 48, pp. 94–98, 2021, Online.. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85110655119&partnerID=40&md5=41c8ba3774dbdbbc1264154bd7ab2abc [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Chan, “GPT-3 and InstructGPT: technological dystopianism, utopianism, and ‘Contextual’ perspectives in AI ethics and industry,” AI Ethics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00148-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Gunawan, “Exploring the future of nursing: Insights from the ChatGPT model,” Belitung Nurs. J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2023, doi: 10.33546/bnj.2551. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. M. Alnaqbi and W. Fouda, “Exploring the Role of ChatGPT and social media in Enhancing Student Evaluation of Teaching Styles in Higher Education Using Neutrosophic Sets,” Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 181–190, 2023, doi: 10.54216/IJNS.200414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Zimmerman, “A Ghostwriter for the Masses: ChatGPT and the Future of Writing,” Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 3170–3173, 2023, doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13436-0. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Şenyaman, “Arapça yabancı dil öğretiminde yapay zekânın geleceği: ChatGPT örneği,” RumeliDE Dil ve Edeb. Araştırmaları Derg., vol. 33, no. 33, pp. 1057–1070, 2023, doi: 10.29000/rumelide.1285940. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Firat, “How Chat GPT Can Transform Autodidactic Experiences and Open Education? Future of Education View project Visual Perception in Educational Design View project,” no. April, 2023, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/9ge8m. [Google Scholar]
  13. Marzuki, U. Widiati, D. Rusdin, Darwin, and I. Indrawati, “The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2236469, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. K. Fitzpatrick, A. Darcy, and M. Vierhile, “Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial,” JMIR Ment. Heal., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.2196/mental.7785. [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Pataranutaporn et al., “AI-generated characters for supporting personalized learning and well-being,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1013–1022, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s42256-021-00417-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Kolenik and M. Gams, “Intelligent cognitive assistants for attitude and behavior change support in mental health: State-of-the-art technical review,” Electron., vol. 10, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10111250. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Qadir, “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education,” in 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2023, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Elbanna and L. Armstrong, “Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: adapting for the future,” Manag. Sustain. An Arab Rev., vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/MSAR-03-2023-0016. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Nikolic et al., “ChatGPT versus engineering education assessment: a multidisciplinary and multi-institutional benchmarking and analysis of this generative artificial intelligence tool to investigate assessment integrity,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 559–614, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2213169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. I. S. Chaudhry, S. A. M. Sarwary, G. A. El Refae, and H. Chabchoub, “Time to Revisit Existing Student’s Performance Evaluation Approach in Higher Education Sector in a New Era of ChatGPT — A Case Study,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2210461, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Farrokhnia, S. K. Banihashem, O. Noroozi, and A. Wals, “A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., pp. 1–15, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846. [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Rahimi and A. T. B. Abadi, “ChatGPT and Publication Ethics,” Arch. Med. Res., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 272–274, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.03.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. D. R. E. Cotton, P. A. Cotton, and J. R. Shipway, “Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., pp. 1–12, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Day, “A Preliminary Investigation of Fake Peer-Reviewed Citations and References Generated by ChatGPT,” Prof. Geogr., pp. 1–4, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1080/00330124.2023.2190373. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Strzelecki, “To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–14, May 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881. [Google Scholar]
  26. F. M. Megahed, Y.-J. Chen, J. A. Ferris, S. Knoth, and L. A. Jones-Farmer, “How generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (mis)used in SPC practice, education, and research? An exploratory study,” Qual. Eng., pp. 1–29, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1080/08982112.2023.2206479. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.