Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 441, 2023
2023 International Conference on Clean Energy and Low Carbon Technologies (CELCT 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02018 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Pollution Control and Low-Carbon Energy Saving Development | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344102018 | |
| Published online | 07 November 2023 | |
- Chen C., Hu Z. (2021) Considerations on High Quality Development of Sugar in China. Sugarcane and Canesugar, 50(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Cao F., Li K., et al. (2021) Comparison of Global Sucrose Industry Competitiveness and China’s Improvement Path Discussion--A comparative analysis based on Brazil Australia, Thailand, and India. Price:Theory & Practice, (12): 12–17, 138. [Google Scholar]
- Wei L., Huang X., Huang W., etc. (2022) The Analysis on the Supporting Equipment and Technical Mode of Sugarcane Leaf Crushing and Returning to the Field in Southern Sugarcane Region. Modern Agricultural Equipment, 43(05):41–44. [Google Scholar]
- Dong X., Zhang J., Li M., et al. (2013) Structural Design of Key Components of 1GYF-240 Sugarcane Leaf Crushing and Returning Machine. China Tropical Agriculture, (6): 39–41. [Google Scholar]
- Pablo A. Silva Ortiz, Daniel Florez-Orrego, Adriano Pinto Mariano, et al. (2022) Exergy and economic assessment of renewable electricity generation from sugarcane straw for improved efficiency of sugarcane biorefineries[J]. International journal of exergy, 38(2):218–237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Itallo Dirceu Costa Silva, Zigomar Menezes De Souza, Ana Paula Guimares Santos, et al. (2022) Removal of Different Quantities of Straw on the Soil Surface: Effects on the Physical Attributes of the Soil and the Productivity of Sugarcane Yield in Southeast Brazil[J]. Sugar Tech: An international journal of sugar crops and related industries, 24(5):1404–1419. [Google Scholar]
- Leônidas C. A. Melo, Puga A.P., Coscione A. R., et al. (2016) Sorption and desorption of cadmium and zinc in two tropical soils amended with sugarcane-straw- derived biochar[J]. Journal of Soils & Sediments, 16(1):226–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Niu Z., Li M., Wu L., etc. (2015) Structural Design of Key Components of 1GYF-250 Typed Sugarcane Trash Shredder. China Tropical Agriculture, (06):28–30. [Google Scholar]
- Lu J., Li M., Wei L., etc. (2011) Optimized Design 0f 1GYF-200 Sugarcane Leaf Shattering and Returning Machine’s Cutter Roller. Applied Mechanics and Materials, (120):172–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Li M., Wang J., Deng Y., et al. (2008) Structural design and experiments on sugarcane leaf shattering and returning machine. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 24 (2): 121–125. [Google Scholar]
- Li M., Lu J., Wei L., Zhang J., Fu X., Wang J., and Song D. (2011) Optimization Design and Experiments on Sugarcane Leaf Shattering and Returning Machine. ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, (4): 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Sun X., Wang P. (2011) The research status and thinking of straw chopping and returning machine. Xinjiang Agricultural Mechanization, (2): 41–43. [Google Scholar]
- Wei S., Li Y., Zhang X., et al. (2019) Design and Experiment of Double-Roller Returning Machine with the Type of Cutting and Feeding for Banana Straw. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, (10): 80–84. [Google Scholar]
- Huang W., Yan X., Dong X., et al. (2018) Design and Experiment on the 1GYFH Type Returning Machine of Grinding and Mixed-Buried Sugarcane Leaves. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, (1): 140–144. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X., Gan S., Zheng K., et al. (2015) Design and experiment of rolling cutting feed type banana pseudostem crushing and returning machine with horizontal axis swing knife. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31 (4): 33–41. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.