EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 460 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 460 (2023) 05028 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 460, 2023
International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology (BFT-2023)
Article Number 05028
Number of page(s) 21
Section Eco Education and Food Waste Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346005028
Published online 11 December 2023
  1. A. Lefstein, H. Perath, Empowering teacher voices in an education policy discussion: Paradoxes of representation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 33–43 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Webster-Wright. Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning, Review of Educational Research, 79 (2), 702–739 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Nir, R. Bogler, The antecedents of teacher satisfaction with professional development programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 377–386 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Derray, W. Shu-Chen, Professional learning community in the mentor teacher program, J. of Taipei Municipal University of Education: Education, 41 (1), 61–90 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Kiracofe, Isn’t School Supposed to Be Free?: An Analysis of State Constitutional Language and School Fees. An Analysis of State Constitutional Language and School Fees, 253 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Mu-Jin, C. Shin-Yi, C. Hung-Chang, The study of steps of teacher career development for Taiwan secondary school, primary school and kindergarten. Educational Resources and Research, 72, 17–32 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  7. C.-S. Wu. Professional standards for teachers. Journal of Education Research, 272, 130–131 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Barry, D. Pendergast, K. Main, Teacher perspectives on the use of the Australian professional standards for teachers as part of their evaluation process. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (8), 1–22 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D.I. Hermiati, How can education system of Singapore contribute to nation building. JurnalBahasa Lingua Scientia, 2 (1), 23–33 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. D.L. Ball, Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What do we think we know and what do we need to learn? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500–508 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Villegas-Reimers, Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (2003) [Google Scholar]
  12. Education Council of Aotearoa New Zealand Graduating teacher standards (2022) [Google Scholar]
  13. Environmental Protection Administration TheEnvironmental Education Act, 4, 19 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. European Union Teachers’ professional development: Europe in international comparison: an analysis of teachers’ professional development based on the OECD’s Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) (2010) [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Gorozidis, A. Papaioannou. Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1–11 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Assalahi, The professional standards for teachers in Saudi Arabia as a framework for EFL teachers’ professional development needs assessment. TESOL International Journal, 16 (6), 161–186 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Timperley, A Background Paper to Inform the Development of a National Professional Development Framework for Teachers and School Leaders. AITSL, Melbourne, Australia (2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. H.-Y. Wu, T.-C. Chen, E.-L. Cheng, Applying Educational Big Data to Analyze the Professional Standards and Development of Teachers in the Field of Science and Technology of Primary and Secondary Schools: using Data from Teachers’ In-Service Training. International J. on Digital Learning tech., 13 (3), 43–80 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Baird, T. Isaacs, S. Johnson, G. Stobart, T. Sprague, Policy Effects of PISA. Oxford Centre for Educational Assessment. UK (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Castaño-Muñoz, M. Kalz, K. Kreijns, Y. Punie. Who is taking MOOCs for teachers’ professional development on the use of ICT? A cross sectional study from Spain. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27, 607–624 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Klug, N. Krause, B. Schober, M. Finsterwald, C. Spiel, How do teachers promote their students’ lifelong learning in class? Development and first application of the LLL Interview. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 119–129 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. J.E. Gepila, Assessing teachers using Philippine standards for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (3), 739–746 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. J.-Y. Lin, H.J. Lai, The Professional Standards of Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 14 (3), 1–28 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Call, Professional Teaching Standards: A Comparative Analysis of Their History, Implementation and Efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Elliott, Teacher performance appraisal: More about performance or development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (9), 102–116 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Hauge, Teachers’ collective professional development in school: A review study. Cogent Education, 6 (1), 1619223 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. L. An-Min, To be an effective instructional leadership: building a connection between theory and practice. Educational Policy Forum, 2 (2), 158–203 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Darling-Hammond, Teacher quality and student achievement. A review of state policy evidence, Periodical Policy Analysis Archives, 8 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Ming-Dih, INSET: from the viewpoint of the self-renewal approach of teachers’ professional development. Proceedings of the Education Symposium: Primary Education, 211–236 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  30. L.M. Desimone, A. C. Porter, B.F. Birman, M. S. Garet, K.S. Yoon, How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers? Teachers College Record, 104 (7), 1265–1312 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Katsuno, Teachers Professional Identities in an Era of Testing Accountability in Japan: The Case of Teachers in Low Performing Schools. Educational Research International, 1–8 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Ryan, T. Bourke, Spatialised metaphors of practice: how teacher educators engagewith professional standards for teachers. Critical Studies in Education, 59 (2), 167–186 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. B. Postholm, M. Bylan, Teachers’ professional development in school: A review study. Cogent education, 5 (1), 1–22 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. D. Burbank, D. Kauchak, An alternative model for professional development: Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching & Teacher Education, 19, 499–514 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ministry of Education, Promote friendly campus plan. Taipei, Taiwan (2012) [Google Scholar]
  36. Ministry of Education, The white paper of towards a learning society. Taipei, Taiwan (1998) [Google Scholar]
  37. N. Clark, Education in South Korea. Asia Pacific. World Education News and Reviews (2013) [Google Scholar]
  38. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTs) What teachers should know and be able to do (2022) [Google Scholar]
  39. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTs). The five core propositions (2016) [Google Scholar]
  40. NSW, NSW Professional Teaching Standards (2005) [Google Scholar]
  41. O. A. Ajani, Teachers’ professional development in South African high schools: How well did it suit their professional needs? African Journal of Development Studies, 10 (3), 59–78 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  42. OECD. Creating effective teaching and learning environments: first results from TALIS (2009) [Google Scholar]
  43. OECD. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education (2011) [Google Scholar]
  44. OECD. TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II) - Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals (2018) [Google Scholar]
  45. OECD. The OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) - 2013 Results (2013) [Google Scholar]
  46. R. Sancar, D. Atal, D. Deryakulu, A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teach. Teacher Educ (2021) [Google Scholar]
  47. S. Sakai, Toward setting professional standards for teacher development in Japan. The Journal of Chiba University of Commerce, 52 (1), 33–45 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Sims, H. Fletcher-Wood, Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: a critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1–17 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  49. SEAMEO, Teaching Competency Standards in Southeast Asian Countries; Eleven Country Audit (2010) [Google Scholar]
  50. V.A. Bondarenko, E.A. Israilova, S. A. Albekova, A.A. Albekova, Difficulties andperspectives of incorporating Russian economy into the European economy andcentripetal tendencies in the EU. European Research Studies Journal, 20 (1), 56–63 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. W. Cheng-Hsien, The new trend of in-service teacher education: school-based teacher professional development. School Administration, 15, 66–76 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  52. W. Ching-Shan, Research in teacher education. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education Press (2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.