EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 460 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 460 (2023) 07028 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 460, 2023
International Scientific Conference on Biotechnology and Food Technology (BFT-2023)
Article Number 07028
Number of page(s) 10
Section Energy Engineering and Renewable Energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346007028
Published online 11 December 2023
  1. EN 1998-1:2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings https://www.en-standard.eu/eurocode-8-design-of-structures-for-earthquake-resistance-part-1-general-rules-seismic-actions-and-rules-for-buildings/ (Last accessed 11.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  2. NZS 1170.5:2004. Structural design actions. Part 5: Earthquake actions - New Zealand. Standards New Zealand. https://www.standards.govt.nz/sponsored-standards/structural-engineering/nzs-1170-5-2004/ (Last accessed 11.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers (2016) https://www.asce.org/7-16/ (Last accessed 21.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  4. AISC 341-16 Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction (2016) https://www.aisc.org/aisc-publications/standards/seismic-provisions-for-structural-steel-buildings/ (Last accessed 21.09.2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. A.G. Tyapin, Summation of modal responses in the linear-spectral method: comparison of various formulas for correlation coefficients, Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety, 1, 32–42 (2021) DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2021-1-32-42 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A.G. Tyapin, Signs of unimodal reaction forces in the linear-spectral method: comparison of classical and normative approaches, Earthquake engineering. Constructions safety, 2, 10–17 (2021) DOI: 10.37153/2618-9283-2021-2-10-17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Benin, S. Nazarova, A. Uzdin, Designing Scenarious of Damage Accumulation, International scientific conference energy management of municipal facilities and sustainable energy technologies EMMFT 2018, edit. Vera Murgul, Marco Pasetti, 2, 600–610 (2018) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19868-8_57 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Benin, O. Nesterova, A. Uzdin, S. Prokopovich, Y. Rutman, G. Youhai, On estimating the reduction factor of bridge piers E3S Web Conf., Key Trends in Transportation Innovatio, 157, 1–17 (2020) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202015706012 [Google Scholar]
  9. V.A. Ilyichev, A.M. Uzdin, T.A. Belash, Tyapin A.G. How to deal with the regulation of earthquake-resistant construction, Industrial and civil construction, 4, 48–54 (2023) DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2023.04.48-54 [Google Scholar]
  10. G.M. Calvi, M.J.N. Priestley, M.J. Kowalsky, Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures May 2008, Earthquake Spectra, 24 (2) (2008) DOI: 10.1193/1.2932170 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Surbhi, K. Nallasivam, Dynamic response of a multi-span suspension bridge subjected to highway vehicle loading, April 2023 Asian Journal of Civil Engineering DOI: 10.1007/s42107-023-00655-9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kh. Kh. Kurbanov, G.V. Lin Hong, Sorokina, A. M. Uzdin, Charactericrics of the seismic movementof the day surface. Theiruseinearthquakeengineering. Geologiya iGeofizika Yuga Rossii, 12 (3), 34–60 (2022) DOI: 10.46698/VNC.2022.47.47.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. M. Uzdin, T.V. Ivanova, G. V. Sorokina, Hong Lin, Kh. Kh. Kurbanov, Sh. Sh. Nazarova, Setting the level of design inputs for the seismic stability structures, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2388, 012080, 1–8 (2022) DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2388/1/012080 [Google Scholar]
  14. A.M. Uzdin, S.V. Prokopovich, Some principles of generating seismic input for calculating structures, E3S Web of Conferences, 157, 06021 (2020) KTTI-2019 DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202015706021 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. P.K. Koliopoulos, B.N. Margaris, N.S. Klimis, Duration and energy characteristics of Greek strong motion records, J. of Earthq. Eng., 2 (3), 391–417 (1998) DOI: 10.1080/13632469809350328 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Arias, A measure of earthquake intensity. Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants. Hansen R.J. (Ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, 438–483 (1970) [Google Scholar]
  17. Y.L. Rutman, Aondowase John Shiwua. Assessment of seismic input energy by means of new definition and the application to earthquake resistant design, Architecture andEngineering, December, 1 (4) (2016) DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2016-1-4-26-35 [Google Scholar]
  18. O. Merter, An investigation on the maximum earthquake input energy for elastic SDOF systems. Earthquakes and Structures, 16 (4), 487–499 (2019) DOI: 10.12989/EAS.2019.16.4.487 [Google Scholar]
  19. Aggiornamentodelle «Normetecnicheperlecostruzioni» (18A00716). Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti. decreto 17 gennaio 2018, Supplementoordinarioalla “Gazzettaufficiale” n. 42 del 20 febbraio, Seriegenerale, 8, 372 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. Sh.Sh. Nazarova, A.M. Uzdin, Setting Peak Ground Accelerations for PerformanceBased Design of Earthquake-Resistant Constructions. Seismic Instruments, 56 (2), 225–236 (2020) DOI: 10.3103/S0747923920020085 http://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923920020085 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sanaz Rezaeian, L. Al Atik, N. M. Kuehn, N. A. Abrahamson, Y. Bozorgnia, S. Mazzoni, K. Withers, K. Campbell, Spectral damping scaling factor for horizontal components of ground motions from subdiction earthquake using NGA-Subdiction data/ Earthquake Spectra, 37 (4), 2453–2492 (2021) DOI: 10.1177/87552930211027903 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Brahmavrathan, C. Arunkumar, Evaluation of response reduction factor of irregular reinforced concrete frame structures, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (23), 2–8 (2016) DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i23/95981 [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. S. Salem, G. Lomiento, J. Khan, Assessment of Response modification factor of reinforced concrete table top-frame structures to seismic loads. Springer. InternationalCongress and Exhibition “Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative InfrastructureGeotechnology”, GeoMEast, Facing the Challenges in Structural Engineering, 55–71 (2017) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61914-9_5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhidong Gao, Mi Zhao, Xiuli Du, M. Hesham El Naggar, Junjie Wang, Seismic analysis of underground structures employing extended response spectrum method, October 2021, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 116 (6), 104089 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104089 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.