EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 484 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 484 (2024) 02003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 484, 2024
The 4th Faculty of Industrial Technology International Congress: Development of Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering for Enhancing Innovation and Reputation (FoITIC 2023)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Information System And Technology Advancement
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448402003
Published online 07 February 2024
  1. T. F. Kusumasari, and R. Fauzi. “Design Guidelines and Process of Metadata Management Based on Data Management Body of Knowledge.” In 2021 7th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), pp. 87-91. IEEE, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Haneem, R. Ali, N. Kama, and S. Basri, “Resolving data duplication, inaccuracy and inconsistency issues using Master Data Management, ” International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. H. Nugroho, A. Bakar, and A. Ali, “Analysis of Technology Acceptance Model : Case Study of Traveloka, ” (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Ajibade, “Technology Acceptance Model Limitations and Criticisms : Exploring the Practical Applications and Use in Technology-related Studies, Mixed-method, and Qualitative Researches CORE View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska, ” (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. A. Kamal, M. Shafiq, and P. Kakria, Technol Soc, 60(Feb), (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Min, K. K. F. So, and M. Jeong, Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770–783, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Rafique, A. O. Almagrabi, A. Shamim, F. Anwar, and A. K. Bashir, Comput Educ, 145(Feb). (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. O. Alassafi, Mater Today Proc (61), 873–877, (2022) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Al-Emran, V. Mezhuyev, and A. Kamaludin, “PLS-SEM in Information Systems Research: A Comprehensive Methodological Reference, ” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer Verlag, 644–653 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Tarka, Qual Quant 52(1), 313–354, (2018) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Sha, Y. Xie, X. Tan, Y. Bai, J. Li, and X. Liu, J Arid Land 9(4), 473–488, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Ali Raza, K. Akram Khan, S. M. Tariq Rafi, and S. Tuba Javaid, Journal of Education & Social Sciences 8(1), 1–15, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Jeyaraj, K. P. Duffy, V. Sethi, and V. Sethi. International Journal of Information Management 58 (2021) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Z. Ali, B. Gongbing, and A. Mehreen. Journal of Computers in Education 5, 297-327, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. H. A. Alfadda, and H. S. Mahdi. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50(4), 883-900, (2021) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. T. Chang, J. Hajiyev, and C. R. Su. “Examining the students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach.” Computers & Education 111, 128-143, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Ibili, D. Resnyansky, and M. Billinghurst. Education and Information Technologies 24, 2653-2675, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Revythi, and N. Tselios. “Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning.” Education and Information technologies 24, 2341-2355, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. N. Al-Suqri, Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends: Theories and Trends. IGI Global, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Li, J. Wang, S. Wangh, and Y. Zhou. “Mobile payment with alipay: An application of extended technology acceptance model.” IEEE Access 7, 50380-50387 (2019):. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Lee, J. Kim, and J. Y. Choi. “The adoption of virtual reality devices: The technology acceptance model integrating enjoyment, social interaction, and strength of the social ties.” Telematics and Informatics 39, 37-48 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. A. Wahab, “Student’s acceptance of digital educational tools: A case study.” In 2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (econf) IEEE, 81-86, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. S. A. Salloum, A. Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, M. Al-Emran, A. Abdel Monem, and K. Shaalan, “Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model, ” IEEE Access (7), 128445–128462, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. A. S. Al-Maroof and M. Al-Emran, “Students acceptance of google classroom: An exploratory study using PLS-SEM approach, ” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning 13(6), 112–123, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.