EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 491 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 491 (2024) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 491, 2024
International Conference on Environmental Development Using Computer Science (ICECS’24)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Health Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202449103004
Published online 21 February 2024
  1. Sangma M, Panda K, Dasiah S. A clinico-pathological research on benign mammary diseases. J Clin Diagn Res 2013 Mar; 7(3): 503-506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nandakumar A, Ramnath T, Chaturvedi M. The magnitude of carcinoma mammary in India: a summary. Indian J Surg Oncol 2010 Jan;1(1):8-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Das A, Murthy BN. A Research of Cytohisto-pathological Correlation of Palpable Mammary Lumps. J Med Sci 2018;4(2):52-56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Esen G, Tutar B, Uras C, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic mammary biopsy in the determination and management of suspicious microcalcifications. Diagn Interv Radiol 2016;22:326–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tozaki, M.; Isomoto, I.; Kojima, Y.; Kubota, K.; Kuroki, Y.; Ohnuki, K.; Mukai, H. The Japanese mammary carcinoma society clinical practice guideline for screening and imaging determination of mammary carcinoma. Mammary Carcinoma 2015, 22, 28–36. [Google Scholar]
  6. Goddi A, Bonardi M, Alessi S. Mammary elasto-graphy: a literature review. J Ultrasound. 2012;15(3):192-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ. Mammary mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elasto-graphy. Radiol. 2011;259(1):59-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, Yamakawa M, Matsumura T. Mammary disease: clinical application of US elasto-graphy for determination. Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):341-50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomas A, Kümmel S, Fritzsche F, Warm M, Ebert B, Hamm B, Fischer T. Real-time sonoelasto-graphy performed in addition to B-mode ultra-sound and mammography: improved differentiation of mammary lesions?. Academic radiology. 2006 Dec 31;13(12):1496-504. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee JH, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Choi JJ, Jeong SH, Yim HW, Song BJ. Role and clinical usefulness of elasto-graphy in small mammary masses. Academic radiology. 2011 Jan 31;18(1):74-80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ElSaid NA, Mohamed HG. Sonoelasto-graphy versus dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating BI-RADS III and IV mammary masses. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2012 Jun 30;43(2):293-300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bojanic K, Katavic N, Smolic M, et al. Implementation of elasto-graphy score and strain ratio in combination with B-mode ultra-sound avoids unnecessary biopsies of mammary lesions. Ultra-sound Med Biol 2017;43:804-16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Menezes R, Sardessai S, Furtado R, Sardessai M. Correlation of strain elasto-graphy with conventional sonography and FNAC/ Biopsy. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:TC05TC10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar AMS, Tanwar NS. Evaluation of mammary lump using elasto-graphy, histopathology and its diagnostic accuracy. Int Surg J 2019;6:574-80. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sinha R, Ali Z, Jaiswal M, et al. Evaluation of focal mammary lesions using ultrasound elasto-graphy with FNAC and/or histo-pathological correlation – a prospective observational research in the region of Katihar, Bihar. J Evid Based Med Healthc 2021;8(25):2143-2148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jishan.Ahmed, Sunil.M.Naik, Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultra-sound Elasto-graphy in Stratifying Mammary Lesions In Relation To Histo-pathological Examination. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 19 (7) Ser.8 (July. 2020), PP 50-55 [Google Scholar]
  17. Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, et al. Evaluation of mammary lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultra-sound Med 2012;31:281–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhao W, Yan K, Liu Y, Zhang Z. Contrast ultra-sound versus ultra-sound elastography for determination of mammary lumps: A cross-sectional research. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(26):e16132. [Google Scholar]
  19. Eremici I, Dumitru C, Navolan D, Craina M, Ivan V, Borcan F, Dehelean CA, Mozos I, Stoian D. Diagnostic Value of Different Risk-Stratification Algorithms in Solid Mammary Lesions. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(19):6943. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thomas A, Kummel S, Fritsche F, et al. Real-time sonoelasto-graphy performed in addition to B-mode ultra-sound and mammography: improved differentiation of mammary lesions? Acad Radiol 2006;13(12):1496-1504. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, et al. Elasto-graphy in the determination of the nodular mammary lesions: preliminary report. Radiol Med 2005;110(1- 2):69-76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.