EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 500 (2024) E3S Web Conf., 500 (2024) 03040 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 500, 2024
The 1st International Conference on Environment, Green Technology, and Digital Society (INTERCONNECTS 2023)
Article Number 03040
Number of page(s) 9
Section Engineering and Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450003040
Published online 11 March 2024
  1. M. B. Dalimunthe, “Keunggulan Bersaing Melalui Orientasi Pasar dan Inovasi produk,” J. Konsep Bisnis dan Manaj., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–31, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Sanni and E. Verdolini, “Eco-innovation and openness: Mapping the growth trajectories and the knowledge structure of open eco-innovation,” Sustain. Futur., vol. 4, no. December 2021, p. 100067, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Efendi, E. Guridno, E. Sugiono, and Sufyati, Penguatan Industri Kecil dan Menengah (IKM) di Indonesia, vol. 53, no. 9. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Sarfiah, H. Atmaja, and D. Verawati, “UMKM Sebagai Pilar Membangun Ekonomi Bangsa,” J. REP (Riset Ekon. Pembangunan), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–189, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. L. N. Rosmadi, “Analisis Faktor-faktor Penunjang Pengembangan Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM),” Semin. Nas. Ekon. Dan Dewantara, pp. 41–48, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.stiedewantara.ac.id/index.php/SNEB/article/view/410. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Teece, M. Peteraf, and S. & Leih, “Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty and Entrepreneurial Management in the Innovation Economy,” Calif. Manag. Rev. 58(4), 13–35., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 13–35, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Luger, S. Raisch, and M. Schimmer, “Dynamic balancing of exploration and exploitation: the contingent benefits of ambidexterity.,” Organ. Sci., vol. 29, pp.449–470., 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.-E. Vahlne and A. Jonsson, “Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA.,” Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 26, pp.57–70., 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Iborra, V. Safón, and C. Dolz, “What explains the resilience of SMEs? Ambidexterity capability and strategic consistency,” Long Range Plann., vol. 53, no. 6, p. 101947, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. E. Lin, E. F. McDonough, S. J. Lin, and C. Y. Y. Lin, “Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox: The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 262–278, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Zacher, A. J. Robinson, and K. Rosing, “Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees’ Self-Reported Innovative Performance: The Role of Exploration and Exploitation Behaviors,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 24–46, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. B. Prasetio, B. bin M. Aboobaider, and A. bin Ahmad, “Organizational Ambidexterity as an Outcome of Quality Dimensions and Triple Helix: The Role of Technology Readiness and User Satisfaction,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 14237, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. B. Taştan and S. M. M. Davoudi, “An Examination of the Relationship between Leader-member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior with the Moderating Role of Trust in Leader: A Study in the Turkish Context,” Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 181, pp. 23–32, 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Robertson, A. Caruana, and C. Ferreira, “Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems,” Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 32, no. 2, p. 101866, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. A. Musthafainal and Tiarapuspa, “Pengaruh Program Intellectual Capital, Relational Capital, Knowledge Management (Cop the Bridge) Terhadap Innovation Performances Karyawan Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan,” J. Ekon. Trisakti, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 367–380, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Lemmetty, V. P. Glaveanu, K. Collin, and P. Forsman, “(Un)sustainable creativity? Different manager-employee perspectives in the finnish technology sector,” Sustain., vol.12, no. 9, pp. 1–16, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Abdul Hamid, “The Role of Employees’ Technology Readiness, Job Meaningfulness and Proactive Personality in Adaptive Performance,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 23, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. N. Elidemir, A. Ozturen, and S. W. Bayighomog, “Innovative behaviors, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 8, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Bonekamp and M. Sure, “Consequences of Industry 4.0 on Human Labour and Work Organisation,” J. Bus. Media Psychol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Paliyanny and U. K. Kassim, “the Readiness in Adapting and Managing Education 4.0: Management Perspective,” Int. J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 63–73, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. A. lyoubi and M. A. Y. Yamin, “The Impact of Task Technology Fit on Employee Job Performance,” Mark. Manag. Innov., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 140–159, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Lokuge, D. Sedera, V. Grover, and X. Dongming, “Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct,” Inf. Manag., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 445–461, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Aldunate and M. Nussbaum, “Teacher adoption of technology,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 29, pp. 519–524, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Nor Hayati, M. N. Norlina, K. Jati, S. Juliza, C. Dealwis, and N. Muhamad Azim, “Sustaining Job Performance through Technology Acceptance with Usage of Whatsapp Mobile Application,” Int. J. Serv. Manag. Sustain., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 123–148, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Okkonen, V. Vuori, and M. Palvalin, “Digitalization Changing Work: Employees’ view on the benefits and hindrances.,” 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. K. Kosasih and A. W. Nugroho, “Perception of Millennial Workforce upon ICT and Organizational Learning and Innovative Performance: The Mediating Role of Ambidexterity,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–161, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Birkinshaw and K. Gupta, “Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies.,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 27, no. 4, pp.287–298., 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Ahmadi, M. H. Mohd Osman, and M. M. Aghdam, “Integrated exploratory factor analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate balanced ambidex_terity fostering innovation in manufacturing SMEs.,” Asia Pacific Manag. Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, pp.142-155., 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. D. J. Teece, “The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 328–352, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. H. D. X. Trieu, P. Van Nguyen, T. T. M. Nguyen, H. T. M. Vu, and K. T. Tran, “Information technology capabilities and organizational ambidexterity facilitating organizational resilience and firm performance of SMEs,” Asia Pacific Manag. Rev., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 544–555, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Taleb and Y. Pheniqi, “Does Innovation Ambidexterity Moderate the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance? Evidence from Morocco,” Int. J. Technol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 724–748, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Alghamdi, “Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance,” J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. A. S. D. I. Pramayani and I. G. A. D. Adnyani, “Pengaruh Pemberdayaan, Perilaku Inovatif, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Karyawan Bumbu Bali Restoran Tanjung Benoa Badung, Bali,” INOBIS J. Inov. Bisnis dan Manaj. Indones., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Rukmala Nur, M. Rakib, M. Hasan, and U. Negeri Makassar, “The Influence of Creativity and Innovation on Business Performance (Studies on Online Business Actors in Makassar),” Hum. South Asean J. Soc. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Sutapa, M. Mulyana, and W. Wasitowati, “The Role of Market Orientation, Creativity and Innovation in Creating Competitive Advantages and Creative Industry Performance,” J. Din. Manaj., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 152–166, 2017 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.