Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 505, 2024
3rd International Conference on Applied Research and Engineering (ICARAE2023)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 15
Section Modelling and Numerical Analysis
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450503001
Published online 25 March 2024
  1. ACI 318-14. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. [Google Scholar]
  2. AISC 360-16 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. [Google Scholar]
  3. ASCE 7-16: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anil. K. Chopra (2007), ‘Textbook on Dynamics of Structures -theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering,’ Prentice-Hall International series. [Google Scholar]
  5. Performance evaluation of passive damping systems for the seismic retrofit of steel moment-resisting frames subjected to near-field ground motions. Earthquake Spectra, 17(3), 427–456. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Halis Gunel, H. Emre Ilgin, 2007, A proposal for the classification of structural systems of tall buildings, www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv, Building and Environment 42 (2007) 2667–2675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bungale S. Taranath, Steel, Concrete, and Composite Design of tall Buildings. CRC Press taylor and Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mehmet Halis Günel “Tall Building: structural system and aerodynamic Form” Routledge publication, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Subramanian’ Design of reinforced concrete structures’ Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Samali “Use of viscoelastic dampers in reducing wind-and earthquake-induced motion of building Structures.” pp639–654, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  11. Wackchaure, M.R. and Ped, S.P. (2012), ‘Earthquake Analysis of High Rise Building with and without In filled Wall,’ IJEIT. Vol-2, Issue-2. [Google Scholar]
  12. Romy Mohan and C. Prabha (2011), ‘Dynamic Analysis of RCC building with Shear wall’, International Journal of Earth Science and Engineering, Vol.04, No: 06 SPI, pp 659–662. [Google Scholar]
  13. Anand, N. Mightraj, C. and Prince Arulraj, G. (2010), ‘Seismic Behavior of RCC Shear Wall Under Soil Condition,’ Indian Geotechnical Conference - December 16-18, 2010 IGS Mumbai Chapter and IIt Bombay. [Google Scholar]
  14. Seismic response study of multi-storied reinforced concrete building with fluid viscous dampers. International Research Journal of Engineering and technology (IRJEt), 5 (5), 2267–2271. [Google Scholar]
  15. Seismic performance assessment of steel moment-resisting frames equipped with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers with the same damping ratio. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 136, 215–228. [Google Scholar]
  16. The effect of design drift limit on the seismic performance of RC dual high‐rise buildings. The Structural Design of tall and Special Buildings, 27(8), e1464. [Google Scholar]
  17. Effect of characteristics of various inter-storey dampers on response control for vibration of building structures. In Proceedings of 11th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 552). [Google Scholar]
  18. Applications of dampers for vibration control of structures: an overview. In International Journal of Research in Engineering and technology, IC-RICE Conference Issue Nov-2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Effect of viscous fluid dampers on steel moment frame designed for strength and hybrid steel moment frame design (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia tech). [Google Scholar]
  20. Ray, W. Clough and Joseph Penzien (tHIRD EDItION)’ textbook on Dynamics of Structures’, International Civil Engineering Consultants, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  21. Effect of fluid viscous dampers in multi-storeyed buildings. IMPACt InT. J. Res. Eng. technol. (IMPACt IJREt), 2(9), 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  22. A five-step procedure for the dimensioning of viscous dampers to be inserted in building structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 14(3), 417–447. [Google Scholar]
  23. Semib S. Tezcan, Ozan Uluca “Reduction of earthquake response of plane frame building by viscoelastic dampers” Engineering Structures 25 (2003) pp. 1755–1761 [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Fawzia and T. Fatima “Deflection Control in Composite Building by Using Belt truss and Outriggers Systems” International Journal of Civil, Environn1ental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol: 4, No: 12, 2010 pp. 414–419. [Google Scholar]
  25. Component testing, Seismic Evaluation and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Braces. DOI: 10.1061/ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880) [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen and tsai, “A Combined Phase and Force Compensation Method for Real-time Hybrid testing,” 15th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., 2012. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Starosielec and D. Hägele, “Discrete-time windows with minimal RMS bandwidth for given RMS temporal width,” Signal Processing, vol. 102, pp. 240–246, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. MathWorks, “MathWorks fmincon - Find minimum of constrained nonlinear multivariable function - MAtLAB,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.mathworks.se/help/optim/ug/fmincon.html. [Accessed: 30-Sep-2018].245 [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Giuffrè and P.E. Pinto, “Il comportamento del cemento armato per sollecitazioni cicliche di forte intensità,” G. del Genio Civ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 391–408, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Ismail, F. Ikhouane, and J. Rodellar, “The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey,” Arch. CompuT. Methods Eng., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 161–188, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Ma, H. Zhang, A. Bockstedte, G.C. Foliente, and P. Paevere, “Parameter Analysis of the Differential Model of Hysteresis,” J. Appl. Mech., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 342–349, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Ikhouane, V. Mañosa, and J. Rodellar, “Dynamic properties of the hysteretic Bouc-Wen model,” SysT. Control LetT., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 197–205, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  33. C.-H. Wang and Y. Wen, “Evaluation of pre-Northridge low-rise steel buildings—part I, modeling.,” J. StrucT. Eng. ASCE, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Kolozvari et al., “Shear-Flexure Interaction Modeling for Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls and Columns under Reversed Cyclic Loading,” October, no. PEER 2015/12, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Bosco, E. Ferrara, A. Ghersi, E.M. Marino, and P.P. Rossi, “Improvement of the model proposed by Menegotto and Pinto for steel,” Eng. StrucT., vol. 124, pp. 442–456, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, J.; Kim, M.C.; Kim, D.K. Preliminary study on a composite steel slit damper. J. Mech. Sci technol. 2021, 35, 3931–3942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.