EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 517 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 517 (2024) 12005 References
Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451712010]

Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 517, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Application (ICETIA 2023)
Article Number 12005
Number of page(s) 5
Section Materials Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451712005
Published online 15 April 2024
  1. M. A. Sultan, I. Imran, and M. Faujan, “Pengaruh Penambahan Limbah Pembakaran Batubara (Fly Ash) Ex PLTU RUM pada Campuran Beton,” Teras J., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 83, 2019, doi: 10.29103/tj.v9i2.186. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. A. Putera, M. H. Gultom, and F. P. Susanto, “Evaluasi dan Perencanaan Pile Cap pada Fly Over Jamin Ginting Kota Medan,” J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 30–31, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Layang, “Fiber Reinforced Polymer As a Reinforcing Material for Concrete Structures,” BALANGA J. Pendidik. Teknol. dan Kejuru., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2021, doi: 10.37304/balanga.v9i1.3276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. C. Ferche and F. J. Vecchio, “Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Silica Reaction-Affected Concrete,” ACI Mater. J., vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 251–262, 2022, doi: 10.14359/51734198. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. M. Labib, A. Setyawan, and A. Sumarsono, “Analisis Reaksi Alkali Silika Agregat terhadap Kuat Tekan dan Kuat Lentur Beton untuk Perkerasan Kaku yang Tahan terhadap Air Laut,” E-Jurnal Matriks Tek. Sipil, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 602–609, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. W. V. A. Satrio and A. Sudjatmiko, “Pengaruh Penambahan Superplasticizer, Serat Steel Wire, dan Slag Baja terhadap Kuat Tekan, Kuat Tarik Belah dan Absorbsi pada Beton SCC,” Simp. Nas. RAPI XIX, pp. 142–152, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11617/12388 [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Anggarini and I. Muzaidi, “Pemanfaatan Limbah Kayu Galam Barito Kuala Sebagai Pengganti Agregat Kasar Pada Campuran Beton,” Konstruksia, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 61, 2021, doi: 10.24853/jk.12.1.61-68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. F. M. Hendarto, Y. Nurchasanah, M. Solikin, and S. Trinugroho, “Pengaruh Substitusi Limbah Pecahan Keramik dan Abu Ampas Tebu Terhadap Kuat Tekan Pada Beton dan Mortar,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Tek. Sipil UMS, pp. 146–150, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  9. Budiarto, Parikin, and M. Dani, “Optimasi Ukuran Partikel dan Komposisi dalam Pembuatan Tegel Komposit Partikulat Granit,” J. Sains Mater. Indones., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Senopati, “Tinjauan Nilai Abrasi pada Agregat yang Berasal dari Quarry Seloputro (Wonogiri), Pare (Wonogiri), Weru (Sukoharjo) terhadap Kuat Tekan, Kuat Tarik Belah dan Absorbsi Beton Menggunakan Metode SNI,” -, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  11. W. H. Prasetya, “Inovasi High Early Strength Concrete Dengan Pemanfaatan Limbah Batu Granit, Cangkang Kerang Dan Fly Ash,” J. Proy. Tek. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 31–41, 2019, doi: 10.14710/potensi.2019.6398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Albefanido, F. Indra, and A. Rita, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Limbah Keramik Granite Alam sebagai Pengganti Agregat Kasar terhadap Kuat Tekan Beton Memadat Sendiri (Self Compacting Concrete),” pp. 15–16, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Risdianto, “Penerapan Self Compacting Concrete (Scc) pada Beton Mutu Normal,” WAKTU J. Tek. UNIPA, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 54–60, 2010, doi: 10.36456/waktu.v8i2.852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. N. R. Adinda and A. Kusumah, “Pemanfaatan Spent Catalyst Rcc-15 sebagai Agregat Mikro dalam Self-Compacting Concrete,” Semin. Nas. Tek. Sipil V UMS, pp. 7–12, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Solikin and M. Nabiilah, “Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Variasi Fly Ash Terhadap Karakteristik Beton Dengan Penambahan Kapur Tohor,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Tek. Sipil 2022 Tek. Sipil Fak. Tek. Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta, pp. 116–123, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Herbudiman and ; Chandra Januar, “Pemanfaatan Serbuk Kaca sebagai Powder pada Self-Compacting Concrete,” 1st Indones. Struct. Eng. Mater. Symp., pp. 1–8, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Ahmadi, E. Abdollahzadeh, and M. Kioumarsi, “Using Marble Waste as A Partial Aggregate Replacement in The Development of Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete,” Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.103. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. 1974-2011, “Cara Uji Kuat Tekan Beton dengan Benda Uji Silinder,” Badan Stand. Nas. Indones., p. 20, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. ASTM C 1260-07, “Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method),” ASTM Int., pp. 1–5, 2007, [Online]. Available: www.ASTM.org [Google Scholar]
  20. EFNARC, “The European Guidelines for Self- Compacting Concrete,” Rep. from EFNARC, no. May, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Mallisa, “Pengaruh Lamanya Pengadukan Terhadap Nilai Slump dan Kandungan Udara Campuran Beton,” J. Smartek, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 80–87, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Ostrowski, D. Stefaniuk, Ł. Sadowski, K. Krzywiński, M. Gicala, and M. Różańska, “Potential Use of Granite Waste Sourced from Rock Processing for The Application as Coarse Aggregate in High-Performance Self- Compacting Concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 238, pp. 1–14, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117794. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Singh, S. Khan, R. Khandelwal, A. Chugh, and R. Nagar, “Performance of Sustainable Concrete Containing Granite Cutting Waste,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 119, pp. 86–98, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. B. R. Murlidhar, E. T. Mohamad, and D. J. Armaghani, “Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Various Rock Types in An Aggregate Granite Quarry,” Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 81, pp. 221–231, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Antolik and D. Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka, “Assessment of The Alkali-Silica Reactivity Potential in Granitic Rocks,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 295, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123690. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.