Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 517, 2024
The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Industrial Application (ICETIA 2023)
Article Number 12007
Number of page(s) 5
Section Materials Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202451712007
Published online 15 April 2024
  1. Y. Li, E. Yang, and K. H. Tan, “Flexural behavior of ultra-high performance hybrid fiber reinforced concrete at the ambient and elevated temperature,” 250, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118487. [Google Scholar]
  2. B. K. Meisuh, C. K. Kankam, and T. K. Buabin, “Case Studies in Construction Materials E ff ect of quarry rock dust on the flexural strength of concrete,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 8, no. July 2017, pp. 16–22, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2017.12.002. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Mehta and R. Siddique, “Sustainable geopolymer concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash: Strength and permeability properties,” J. Clean. Prod., 205, pp. 49–57, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. V. C. Li, M. Lepech, and S. Wang, “Development of green engineered cementitious composites for sustainable infrastructure systems,” Int. Work. Sustain. Dev. Concr. Technol., 1, no. September, pp. 181–191, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Davidovits, “Global warming impact on the cement and aggregates industries,” World Resour. Rev., 6(2), pp. 263–278, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Klarens, M. Indranata, Antoni, and D. Hardjito, “Pemanfaatan Bottom Ash dan Fly Ash Tipe C Sebagai Bahan Pengganti dalam Pembuatan Paving Block,” J. Dimens. Pratama Tek. Sipil, 5(2), pp. 1–8, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Sandanayake, C. Gunasekara, D. Law, G. Zhang, and S. Setunge, “Greenhouse gas emissions of different fly ash based geopolymer concretes in building construction,” J. Clean. Prod., 204, pp. 399–408, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.311. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Lloyd and B. Rangan, “Geopolymer Concrete: A Review of Development and Opportunities,” 35th Conf. Our World Concr. Struct., pp. 307–314, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://www.cipremier.com/e107_files/download s/Papers/100/35/100035037.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Ujianto, E. L. Ardiansyah, G. O. Ilokana, and M. F. Falah, “Optimization of superplasticizer MasterGlenium SKY 8614 with added materials fly ash, steel slag, and silica fume for high strength concrete,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 403(1), 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/403/1/012026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W. P. Zakka, N. H. Abdul Shukor Lim, and M. Chau Khun, “A scientometric review of geopolymer concrete,” J. Clean. Prod., 280, p. 124353, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124353. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Azaria and R. Gupta, “Comparative study involving the effect of curing regime on the elastic modulus of geopolymer concrete,” Buildings, 10(6), 2020, doi 10.3390/BUILDINGS10060101. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Triwulan, J. J. Ekaputri, and N. F. Priyanka, “The Effect of Temperature Curing on Geopolymer Concrete,” MATEC Web Conf., 97, pp. 0–5, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/20179701005. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Jaya Ekaputri, I. Sabrina Mutiara, S. Nurminarsih, N. Van Chanh, K. Maekawa, and D. H. E. Setiamarga, “The effect of steam curing on chloride penetration in geopolymer concrete,” MATEC Web Conf., 138, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201713801019. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Hardjito, S. E. Wallah, D. M. J. Sumajouw, and B. V. Rangan, “Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete,” Civ. Eng. …, 6(2), pp. 88–93, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. R. Meesala, N. K. Verma, and S. Kumar, “Critical review on fly-ash based geopolymer concrete,” Struct. Concr., 21(3), pp. 1013–1028, 2020, doi: 10.1002/suco.201900326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.