EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 529 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 529 (2024) 01053 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 529, 2024
International Conference on Sustainable Goals in Materials, Energy and Environment (ICSMEE’24)
Article Number 01053
Number of page(s) 10
Section Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452901053
Published online 29 May 2024
  1. E. R Sujatha, S Saisree, “ Geotechnical Behavior of Guar Gum Treated Soil”, Soil and Foundations, 2019. Doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.11.012 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ilhan Chang, et al, ” Geotechnical Engineering Behaviors of Gellan Gum Biopolymer Treated Sand “,Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2016. Doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015–0475 [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonio Soldo, et al,” Biopolymer as a Sustainable Solution for Enhancement of Soil Mechanical Properties “,Nature research,2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ilhan Chang, et al, ’Shear Strength Behaviour and parameters of Microbial Gellan Gum Treated soil: From sand to Clay “, Acta Geotechnical, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Anjan Petel,” Soil Stabilization”, Geotechnical investigations and improvement of Ground Conditions, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ali Akbar Firoozi, ” Fundamentals of Soil Stabilization”, Geo-Engineering.2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jungyeon Jang, “A review of the Application of Biopolymers on Geotechnical Engineering and Strengthening Mechanism Between Typical Biopolymers and Soils” [Google Scholar]
  8. Advance in Material Science and Engineering, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Muhammad Ali Rahman, ”Stabilization of low plastic and high plastic clay using Guar Gum biopolymer “, Jarie, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. Biju, M. S., & Arnepalli, D.N. (2019). Biopolymer -modified soil:prospects of a promising green technology. In Geotechnical Characterisation and Geoenvironmental Engineering (pp.163–169).Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang, I., Jeon, M., & Cho, G.C. ”Application of microbial biopolymers as an alternative construction binder for earth buildings in underdeveloped countries”. International jounal of polymer science.2015Doi:10.1155/2015/326745 [Google Scholar]
  12. Aminpour, M., O’Kelly, B.C., 2015. Applications of biopolymers in dam construction and operation activities. Proceedings of 2nd International Dam World Conference, Portugal, pp. 937–946. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ayeldeen, M., Abdelazim, K., Negm, M., El Sawwaf, Mostafa A., 2016. Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures. Arabian J. Geosci. 9, 371–384. [13] Chang, I., Cho, G.C., 2014. Geotechnical behavior of a beta-1,3/1,6- glucan biopolymer- treated residual soil. Geomech. Eng. 7, 633–647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, I., Cho, G.C., 2018. Shear strength behavior and parameters of microbial gellan gum treated soils: from sand to clay. Acta Geotech. 21, 89–103. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang, I., Im, J., Cho, G.C., 2016a. Geotechnical engineering behaviors of gellan gum biopolymer treated sand. [Google Scholar]
  16. Can Geotech, J. Korea, 1–38. Chang, I., Im, J., Cho, G.C., 2016b. Introduction of microbial biopolymers in soil treatment for future environmentally-friendly and sustainable geotechnical engineering. Sustainability 8, 251–273. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang, I., Im, J., Prasidhi, A.K., Cho, G.C., 2015. Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Constr. Build. Mater. 74, 65–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, R., Zhang, L., Budhu, M., 2013. Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139, 1802–1807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chudzikowski, R.J., 1971. Guar gum and its applications. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. Great Br. Oxford 22, 43–60. [Google Scholar]
  20. Arunkumar, Kadarkarai, Muthiah Muthukannan, Arunachalam Suresh Kumar, Arunasankar Chithambar Ganesh, and Rangaswamy Kanniga Devi. 2021. “Production of Eco-Friendly Geopolymer Concrete by Using Waste Wood Ash for a Sustainable Environment.” Pollution 7(4):993–1006. doi: 10.22059/POLL.2021.320857.1039. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sankar, B., and P. Ramadoss. 2022. “Experimental and Statistical Investigations on Alccofine Based Ternary Blended High-Performance Concrete.” International Journal of Engineering, Transactions B: Applications 35(8):1629–40. doi: 10.5829/IJE.2022.35.08B.19. [Google Scholar]
  22. ASTM. 2010. Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM standard D5084–10. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. doi:10.1520/ D5084–10. [Google Scholar]
  23. ASTM. 2011a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM standard D2487. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa. doi:10.1520/ D2487–11. [Google Scholar]
  24. ASTM. 2011b. Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM standard D3080/D3080M-11. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. doi:10.1520/D3080_D3080M-11. [Google Scholar]
  25. Prithiviraj, Chidambaram, Jagadeesan Saravanan, Deivasigamani Ramesh Kumar, Gunasekaran Murali, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, and Packirisamy Swaminathan. 2022. “Assessment of Strength and Durability Properties of Self-Compacting Concrete Comprising Alccofine.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 14(10):1–19. doi: 10.3390/su14105895. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.