EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 07002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 07002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Physical and Numerical Modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454407002
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Abadie, C. N. 2015. “Cyclic lateral loading of monopole foundations in cohesionless soils”, PhD Thesis, University of Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abadie, C. N., Byrne, B. W., Houlsby, G. T. 2019. “Rigid pile response to cyclic lateral loading: Laboratory tests”, Geotechnique, v. 69 (10), pp. 863–876. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.325 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Achmus, M., Kuo, Y-S., Abdel-Rahman, K. 2009. “Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load”, Computer and Geotechnics, v. 36 (5), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  4. Almeida, M. S. S., Oliveira, W. L., Medeiros, C. J., Porto, E. C. 1987. “Laboratory tests and design parameters for offshore piles in Campos Basin calcareous sands”, 6th International on Offshore Engineering, pp. 215–225. [Google Scholar]
  5. Almeida, M. S. S., Almeida, M. C. F., Trejo, P. C., et al. 2014. “The geotechnical beam centrifuge at COPPE centrifuge laboratory”, 8th international Conference of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. ASTM 4254. 2016. “Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density”, American Society for Testing and Materials, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4254-16 [Google Scholar]
  6. ASTM D4015. 2017. “Standard test methods for modulus and damping of soils by fixed-base resonant column devices”, American Society for Testing and Materials, USA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4015-15 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bienen, B., Klinkvort, R. T., Fan, S., Black, J., Bayton, S., Thorel, L., Madabhushi, G. S. P., Askarinejad, A., Li, Q., etal. 2019. “Centrifuge benchmark testing of laterally loaded monopiles in sand”, 16th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:f80f5f93-fbe0-4ddc-95c9-94583f4d1526 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blaker, O., Lunne, T., Vestgarden, T., Krogh, L., Thomsen, N. V., Powell, J. J. M., Wallace, C. F. 2015. “Method dependency for determining maximum and minimum dry unit weights of sands”, 3rd International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, v. 3, pp. 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18442-174 [Google Scholar]
  9. Buckley, R. M, et al. 2020. “Large diameter pile testing for offshore wind applications with a focus on cyclic lateral loading and rate effects”, 4th International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, pp. 1403–1412. [Google Scholar]
  10. Byrne, B.W., et al. 2020. “Cyclic laterally loaded medium scale field pile testing for the Pisa project”, 4th International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, pp. 1323–1332. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a24d76c2-c3aa-4768-aacc-bc8984d9a3cd [Google Scholar]
  11. Correia, A. G., Barros, J. M., Santos, J. A., Sussumu, N. 2001. “An approach to predict shear modulus of soils in the range of 10–6 to 10–2 strain levels”, IV International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. [Google Scholar]
  12. Drnevich, V. P., Werden, S., Ashlock, J. C., Hall, J. R. J. 2015. “Applications of the new approach to resonant column testing”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, v. 38 (1), pp. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140222. ISSN 0149–6115 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dyson, G. J., Randolph, M. F. 2001. “Monotonic lateral loading of piles in calcareous sand”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, v. 127 (4), pp. 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(346) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. El-Reedy, M. A. 2012. “Offshore structures: design, construction and maintenance”, 1st Edition, Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 208–253. [Google Scholar]
  15. EPBR “Offshore wind farms under licensing in Brazil reaches 80 GW”, Available at: https://epbr.com.br/eolicasoffshore-em-licenciamento-no-brasil-somam-80-gw-depotencia/, accessed on: 05/06/2022 [in Portuguese]. [Google Scholar]
  16. Flores Lopez, F. A., Taboada, V. M., Gonzalez Ramirez, Z. X., Cruz Roque, D., Barrera Nabor, P., & Dantal, V. S. 2018. “Normalized modulus reduction and damping ratio curves for bay of Campeche carbonate sand”, Offshore Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.4043/29010-ms [Google Scholar]
  17. Futai, M. M., Dong, J., Haigh, S. K., et al. 2018. “Dynamic response of monopiles in sand using centrifuge modelling”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, v. 115, pp. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Garske, R. B. 2020. “Personal communication”. Kirkwood, P. B. 2015. “Cyclic lateral loading of monopole foundations in sand”, DSc Thesis, University of Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  19. Klinkvort, R. T. 2012. “Centrifuge modelling of drained lateral pile-soil response”, PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  20. Klinkvort, R. T., Black, J. A., Bayton, S. M., et al. 2018. “A review of modelling effects in centrifuge monopile testing in sand”, Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, v. 1, pp. 719–724. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429438660-108 [Google Scholar]
  21. Leblanc, C. B. 2009. “Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures: Selected topics in the field of geotechnical engineering”, PhD Thesis, Aalborg University. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lopes, G. K., Sousa, J. R. M., Almeida, M. C. F., Almeida, M. S. S. 2023. “A numerical methodology to predict the lateral load response of monopiles installed in sand considering soil stiffness degradation”, Ocean Engineering, v. 270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113723 [Google Scholar]
  23. Madabhushi, G. 2014. “Centrifuge modelling for civil engineers”, 1st Edition, Taylor & Francis Group, USA. [Google Scholar]
  24. Menq, F. 2003. “Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils”, Phd Thesis, University of Texas. [Google Scholar]
  25. Miura, S., Toki, S. 1982. “A Sample preparation method and its effect on static and cyclic deformation-strength properties of sand”, Soils and Foundations , v. 22 (1), pp. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.22.61 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. OECO “The unknown ‘rolling stones’ reefs”, Available at: https://oeco.org.br/analises/rodolitos-os-desconhecidosrecifes-rolling-stones/on:06/06/2022 [in Portuguese]. [Google Scholar]
  27. OWM “Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition”, Available at (accessed on 06/06/2022): https://www.energy.gov/eere/wind/articles/offshore-windmarket-report-2021-edition-released [Google Scholar]
  28. Poulos, H. G. 1982. “Single pile response to cyclic lateral load”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, v. 108(3), pp 355–375. [Google Scholar]
  29. Poulos, H. G. 1982. “Single pile response to cyclic lateral load”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, v. 108(3), pp 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001255 [Google Scholar]
  30. Poulos, H. G., Uesugi, M., Young, G. S. 1982. “Strength and deformation properties of Bass Strait carbonate sands”, Geotechnical Engineering, v. 13 (2), pp. 189–211. [Google Scholar]
  31. Senetakis, K., Madhusudhan, B. N. 2015. “Dynamics of potential fill–backfill material at very small strains”, Soils and Foundations, v. 55 (5), pp. 1196–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.019 [Google Scholar]
  32. Watson, P., Bransby, M. F., Delimi, Z., et al. 2019. “Foundation design in offshore carbonate sediments–building on knowledge to address future challenges”, XVI Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 240–274.https://doi.org/10.3233/ASMGE190022 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.