EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 07003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 07003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Behaviour, Characterization and Modelling of Various Geomaterials and Interfaces - Physical and Numerical Modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454407003
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Airey, D. W. 1993. “Triaxial Testing of Naturally Cemented Carbonate Soil.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119: 1379–1398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:9(1379) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alavarado, G., M. R. Coop, and S. Willson. 2012. “On the role of bond breakage due to unloading in the behaviour of weak sandstones.” Geotechnique 62: 303–316. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alliez P., Jamin C., Rineau L., Tayeb S., Tournois J,. Yvinec M. 2022. 3D. CGAL Editorial Board. https://doc.cgal.org/5.5/Manual/packages.html [Google Scholar]
  4. Boissonnat J.D., Oudot S.Y. 2005. “Provably good sampling and meshing of surfaces.” Graphical Models. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmod.2005.01.004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clough, W., N. Sitar, and R. C. Bachus. 1981. “Cemented Sands under Static Loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 107: 799–817. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001152 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cundall, P. A., and O. D.L. Strack. 1979. “A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies.” Geotechnique 29: 47–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dano, D., P.Y. Hicher, and S. Tailiez. 2004. “Engineering properties of grouted sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130: 328–338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:3(328) [Google Scholar]
  8. Das, A., A. Tengattini, G. Viggiani, and G. Nguyen. 2014. “A thermomechanical constitutive model for cemented granular materials with quantifiable internal variables. Part II - Validation and localization analysis.” J Mech Phys Solids. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Desrues, Jacques, G. Viggiani, and P. Bésuelle. 2010. Advances in X-ray Tomography for Geomaterials. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470612187 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hsieh, J. 2015. Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Third Edition. SPIE. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/3.2197756 [Google Scholar]
  11. Moës, N., M. Cloirec, P. Cartraud, and J.-F. Remacle. 2003. “A computational approach to handle complex microstructure geometries.” COMPUT METHOD APPL M 192: 3163–3177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(03)00346-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nagula, S., J Grabe, and P. Mayanja. 2018. “Deep vibration compaction of sand using mini vibrator.” PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS. London. [Google Scholar]
  13. Otsu, N. 1979. “A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9: 62–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pons J.P., S´egonne F., Boissonnat J.D., Rineau L., Yvinec M.,. 2007. “High-Quality Consistent Meshing of Multi-label.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73273-0-17 [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosquoët, F., A. Alexis, A. Kheilidj, and A. Phelipot. 2003. “Experimental study of cement grout: Rheological behavior and sedimentation.” Cem Concr Res 33: 713–722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01036-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Roubin, E., A. Vallade, N. Benkemoun, and C. Jean-Baptiste. 2014. “Multi-scale failure of heterogeneous materials: A double kinematics enhancement for Embedded Finite Element Method.” Int J Solids Struct 52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Stamati, O., E. Roubin, E. Andò, and Y. Malecot. 2018. “Phase segmentation of concrete x-ray tomographic images at meso-scale: Validation with neutron tomography.” Cem Concr Compos 88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Stamati, Olga and Andò, Edward and Roubin, Emmanuel and Cailletaud, Rémi and Wiebicke, Max and Pinzón, Gustavo and Couture, Cyrille and Hurley, Ryan and Caulk, Robert and Caillerie, Denis and Matsushima, Takashi and Bésuelle, Pierre and Bertoni, Félix and, O. Stamati, E. Andò, E. Roubin, R. Cailletaud, M. Wiebicke, G. Pinzón, et al. 2020. “spam: Software for Practical Analysis of Materials.” J. Open Source Softw. 5: 2286. doi:https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02286 [Google Scholar]
  19. Stamati, Olga and Roubin, Emmanuel and Andò, Edward and Malecot, Yann and Pascal, Charrier. 2021. “Fracturing process of micro-concrete under uniaxial and triaxial compression: Insights from in-situ X-ray mechanical tests.” Cement and Concrete Research 149: 106578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106578 [Google Scholar]
  20. Tengattini, A., A. Das, G. D. Nguyen, G. Viggiani, S. A. Hall, and I. Einav. 2014. “A thermomechanical constitutive model for cemented granular materials with quantifiable internal variables. Part I-Theory.” J Mech Phys Solids 70: 281–296. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.05.021 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wichtmann, T., and T. Triantafyllidis. 2014. “Stiffness and Damping of Clean Quartz Sand with Various Grain-Size Distribution Curves.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000977 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.