EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 601 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 601 (2025) 00039 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 601, 2025
The 3rd International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2024)
Article Number 00039
Number of page(s) 18
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560100039
Published online 16 January 2025
  1. N. A. Faraz, F. Ahmed, M. Ying, and S. A. Mehmood, “The interplay of green servant leadership, self-efficacy, and intrinsic motivation in predicting employees’ pro-environmental behavior,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1171–1184, 2021, doi: 10.1002/csr.2115. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Kousar, M. Afzal, F. Ahmed, and S. Bojnec, “Environmental Awareness and Air Quality: The Mediating Role of Environmental Protective Behaviors,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14063138. [Google Scholar]
  3. X. Wang and X. Chen, “An empirical study on financing constraints of digital inclusive finance development on small and medium-sized technology-based enterprise,” Kybernetes, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 585–600, 2023, doi: 10.1108/K-01-2022-0095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Riaz, S. Gul, and Y. Lee, “The Influence of Individual Cultural Value Differences on ProEnvironmental Behavior among International Students at Korean Universities,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15054490. [Google Scholar]
  5. WMO, State of the Climate in Asia 2022. 2024. doi: 10.18356/9789263113214. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. De Sario, K. Katsouyanni, and P. Michelozzi, “Climate change, extreme weather events, air pollution and respiratory health in Europe,” Eur. Respir. J., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 826–843, 2013, doi: 10.1183/09031936.00074712. [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Shirvell, “Climate Change in the Indonesian Mind,” Yale Sch. Environtment, p. 6, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/climate-change-in-the-indonesian-mind-e.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Fu, Y. S. Ren, Y. Tian, S. W. Narayan, and O. Weber, “Reexamining the relationship between ESG and firm performance: Evidence from the role of Buddhism,” Borsa Istanbul Rev., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–60, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2023.10.011. [Google Scholar]
  9. I. M. Ilyas and O. Osiyevskyy, “Exploring the impact of sustainable value proposition on firm performance,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 729–740, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.009. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Calculli, A. M. D’Uggento, A. Labarile, and N. Ribecco, “Evaluating people’s awareness about climate changes and environmental issues: A case study,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 324, no. November, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129244. [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Kachaner, J. Nielsen, and P. Adrien, “The Pandemic Is Heightening Environmental Awareness | BCG,” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/pandemic-is-heightening-environmental-awareness [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Hu, Z. Xu, and S. Chen, “How do businesses achieve sustainable success and improve the quality of products in the green competitive era?,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 34, no. 3-4, pp. 496–514, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2071693. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Lampert, “Over-exploitation of natural resources is followed by inevitable declines in economic growth and discount rate,” Nat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09246-2. [Google Scholar]
  14. H. S. Karimi and A. A. Pina, “Building Resiliency and Creating Innovation in the Digital Age Through Leadership and Human-Connection,” J. Strateg. Innov. Sustain., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 10–20, 2022, doi: 10.33423/jsis.v17i3.5638. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Smit et al., “Toward a sustainable, inclusive, growing future: The role of business,” McKinsey Co., no. November 2022, pp. 1–32, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featuredinsights/sustainableinclusivegrowth/towardasustainableinclusivegrowingfuturetheroleofbusiness/toward-a-sustainable-inclusive-growing-future-the-role-of-business.pdf?shouldIndex=false [Google Scholar]
  16. D. C. Dabija, B. M. Bejan, and C. Puscas, “A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 13, no. 7, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jrfm13070152. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Sheasby, “Examining Factors that Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour and Conscious between Rural and Urban Populations,” 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Pradeep and M. Pradeep, “Awareness of sustainability, climate emergency, and generation Z’s consumer behaviour in UAE,” Clean. Responsible Consum., vol. 11, no. September, p. 100137, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100137. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Andruszkiewicz, M. Grzybowska-Brzezinska, M. Grzvwinska-Rapca. and P. D. Wisniewski, “Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behavior of Representatives of Generation Z from the Example of Poland and Germany,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 20, p. 15068, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152015068. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Ahmat Zainuri, N. Abd-Rahman, L. Halim, M. Y. Chan, and N. N. Mohd Bazari, “Measuring Pro-Environmental Behavior Triggered by Environmental Values,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. X. Li, Z. Liu, and T. Wuyun, “Environmental Value and Pro-environmental Behavior Among Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Risk Perception and Moral Anger,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. February, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.771421. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Pyo, S. G. Chung, H. R. Ma, and D. H. Oh, “Firms for Sustainable Manufacturing: Understanding the Key Determinants of Pro-environmental Behaviour,” Sci. Technol. Soc., vol. 29, no. (2), pp. 262–281., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218241238265 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Kollmus and J. Agyeman, “Mind the Gap : Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers Mind the Gap : why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to,” Environ. Educ. Res., no. August 2002, pp. 37–41, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1350462022014540. [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Moser, S., Kleinhuckelkotten. “Good Intents, but Low Impacts: Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint.,” Environ. Behav., vol. 50, no. (6), pp. 626–656., 2018, doi: 10.4324/9780429039614. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Torkar and F. X. Bogner, “Environmental values and environmental concern,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1570–1581, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  26. E. van der Werff, L. Steg, and K. Keizer, “Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 40, pp. 273–282, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004. [Google Scholar]
  27. X. Wang, E. Van der Werff, T. Bouman, M. K. Harder, and L. Steg, “I Am vs. We Are: How Biospheric Values and Environmental Identity of Individuals and Groups Can Influence Proenvironmental Behaviour,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. February, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956. [Google Scholar]
  28. W. T. Chen and M. H. Hsieh, “Environmental self-identity, self-efficacy, and the emergence of green opinion leaders: An exploratory study,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e17351, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17351. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Guo, “The significance of green entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Mediating and moderating role of green innovation and green knowledge sharing culture,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. September, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1001867. [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Guo, Y. Xu, G. Liu, T. Wang, and C. Du, “Understanding firm performance on green sustainable practices through managers’ ascribed responsibility and waste management: Green self-efficacy as moderator,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 1–16, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11184976. [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Gomes, J. M. Lopes, and S. Nogueira, “Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 390, no. January, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136092. [Google Scholar]
  32. L. L. Dragolea et al., “Determining factors in shaping the sustainable behavior of the generation Z consumer,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 11, no. January, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1096183. [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Chen and Z. Wu, “How to facilitate employees’ green behavior? The joint role of green human resource management practice and green transformational leadership,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. August, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906869. [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Tian and X. Liu, “Pro-Environmental Behavior Research: Theoretical Progress and Future Directions,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 11, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116721. [Google Scholar]
  35. Z. Ren and K. Zhong, “Driving mechanism of subjective cognition on farmers’ adoption behavior of straw returning technology: Evidence from rice and wheat producing provinces in China,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. August, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922889. [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Balunde, G. Perlaviciute, and L. Steg, “The relationship between people’s environmental considerations and pro-environmental behavior in Lithuania,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, no. OCT, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02319. [Google Scholar]
  37. F. Monus, “Environmental perceptions and pro-environmental behavior-comparing different measuring approaches,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 132–156, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13504622.2020.1842332. [Google Scholar]
  38. M. A. Ribeiro, S. Seyfi, S. Elhoushy, K. M. Woosnam, and V. Patwardhan, “Determinants of generation Z pro-environmental travel behaviour: the moderating role of green consumption values,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2023.2230389. [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Berliandaldo, A. Wijaya Holman Fasa, S. Kholiyah, A. Chodiq, and T. Hendrix, “Transformasi Digital Dan Strategi Pengembangan Bisnis Umkm Yang Adaptif Dan Berkelanjutan Pasca Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Anal. Kebijak., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 54–73, 2021, doi: 10.37145/jak.v4i2.468. [Google Scholar]
  40. D. I. Wijaya and P. Kokchang, “Factors Influencing Generation Z’s Pro-Environmental Behavior towards Indonesia’s Energy Transition,” pp. 1–19, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  41. A. J. Parzonko, A. Balinska. and A. Sieczko, “Pro-environmental behaviors of generation z in the context of the concept of homo socio-oeconomicus,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14061597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. N. Yasir. M. Babar. H. S. Mehmood. R. Xie. and G. Guo. “The Environmental Values Play a Role in the Development of Green Entrepreneurship to Achieve Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention.” Sustain. vol. 15. no. 8. 2023. doi: 10.3390/su15086451. [Google Scholar]
  43. X. Xie and Q. Zhu. “Exploring an innovative pivot: How green training can spur corporate sustainability performance,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2432–2449, 2020, doi: 10.1002/bse.2512. [Google Scholar]
  44. S. O. Atiku, “Institutionalizing Social Responsibility Through Workplace Green Behavior,” no. October, pp. 183–199, 2018, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6286-3.ch010. [Google Scholar]
  45. E. Cuadrado, L. H. Macias-Zambrano, A. J. Carpio, and C. Tabernero, “The moderating effect of collective efficacy on the relationship between environmental values and ecological behaviors,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 4175–4202, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01611-w. [Google Scholar]
  46. M. Allen, “Understanding Pro-Environmental Behavior: Models and Messages. In: Strategic Communication for Sustainable Organizations.,” in CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18005-2_4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. A. Roy, A. Basu, Y. Su, Y. Li, and X. Dong, “Understanding Recent Trends in Global Sustainable Development Goal 6 Research: Scientometric, Text Mining and an Improved Framework for Future Research,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042208. [Google Scholar]
  48. X. Y. Wang, G. Li, S. Malik, and A. Anwar, “Impact of COVID-19 on achieving the goal of sustainable development: E-learning and educational productivity,” Econ. Res. Istraz., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1950–1966, 2022, doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1927789. [Google Scholar]
  49. M. Chen, E. Jeronen, and A. Wang, “Toward environmental sustainability, health, and equity: How the psychological characteristics of college students are reflected in understanding sustainable development goals,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 15, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158217. [Google Scholar]
  50. M. Tamar, H. Wirawan, T. Arfah, and R. P. S. Putri, “Predicting pro-environmental behaviours: the role of environmental values, attitudes and knowledge,” Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 328–343, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0264. [Google Scholar]
  51. L. B. Miller, R. E. Rice, A. Gustafson, and M. H. Goldberg, “Relationships Among Environmental Attitudes, Environmental Efficacy, and Pro-Environmental Behaviors Across and Within 11 Countries,” Environ. Behav., vol. 54, no. 7-8, pp. 1063–1096, 2022, doi: 10.1177/00139165221131002. [Google Scholar]
  52. B. Yuan and J. Li, “Understanding the Impact of Environmentally Specific Servant Leadership on Employees’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors in the Workplace: Based on the Proactive Motivation Model,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010567. [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Y. Yusliza et al., “An investigation of pro-environmental behaviour and sustainable development in Malaysia,” Sustain., vol. 12, no. 17, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12177083. [Google Scholar]
  54. W. J. Boone, M. S. Yale, and J. R. Staver, Rasch analysis in the human sciences. New York: Springer US, 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4. [Google Scholar]
  55. B. Sumintono, Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, November 2. Trim Komunikata, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  56. P. C. Stern, T. Dietz, and G. A. Guagnano, “A Brief Inventory of Values.,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 58, no. (6), pp. 984–1001., 1998. [Google Scholar]
  57. T. Bouman, L. Steg, and H. A. L. Kiers, “Measuring values in environmental research: A test of an environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, no. APR, pp. 1–15, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564. [Google Scholar]
  58. L. Steg, G. Perlaviciute, E. van der Werff, and J. Lurvink, “The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions,” Environ. Behav., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 163–192, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0013916512454730. [Google Scholar]
  59. D. G. J. Dei and F. Y. Asante, “Role of academic libraries in the achievement of quality education as a sustainable development goal,” Libr. Manag., vol. 43, no. 6-7, pp. 439–459, 2022, doi: 10.1108/LM-02-2022-0013. [Google Scholar]
  60. W. Fu, Y. Zhou, L. Li, and R. Yang, “Understanding household electricity-saving behavior: Exploring the effects of perception and cognition factors,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 28, no. August, pp. 116–128, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.035. [Google Scholar]
  61. I. Ghozali, Partial Least Squares Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.2.9. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  62. M. Sarstedt, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and J. F. Hair, A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). California USA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2. [Google Scholar]
  63. E. Yafi, S. Tehseen, and S. A. Haider, “Impact of green training on environmental performance through mediating role of competencies and motivation,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13105624. [Google Scholar]
  64. J. Wang, Y. Xue, X. Sun, and J. Yang, “Green learning orientation, green knowledge acquisition and ambidextrous green innovation,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 250, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119475. [Google Scholar]
  65. M. Barba-Aragon and D. Jiménez-Jiménez, “Is training a green innovation driver? The mediating role of knowledge acquisition,” J. Knowl. Manag., 2023. [Google Scholar]
  66. F. T. Moradeke, G. K. Ishola, and O. L. Okikiola, “Green Training and Development Practices on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from WAMCO PLC,” J. Educ. Manag. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.48112/jemss.v1i2.212. [Google Scholar]
  67. J. Liu, Y. Liu, and L. Yang, “Uncovering the influence mechanism between top management support and green procurement: The effect of green training,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 251, p. 119674, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119674. [Google Scholar]
  68. P. Paillé, P. Valéau, and D. W. Renwick, “Leveraging green human resource practices to achieve environmental sustainability,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 260, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121137. [Google Scholar]
  69. M. A. V. Molina, A. F. Sainz, and J. I. Olaizola, “Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour : comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 61. pp. 130–138, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. G. Liobikiene and M. S. Poskus, “The importance of environmental knowledge for private and public sphere pro-environmental behavior: Modifying the Value-Belief-Norm theory,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 12, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su10023324. [Google Scholar]
  71. P. Diaz-Siefer, A. Neaman, E. Salgado, J. L. Celis-Diez, and S. Otto, “Human-environment system knowledge: A correlate of pro-environmental behavior,” Sustain., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 15510–15526, 2015, doi: 10.3390/su71115510. [Google Scholar]
  72. M. Ienna et al., “The Relative Role of Knowledge and Empathy in Predicting ProEnvironmental Attitudes and Behavior,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084622. [Google Scholar]
  73. R. Gifford and A. Nilsson, “Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review,” Int. J. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 141–157, 2014, doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034. [Google Scholar]
  74. I. Hossain, M. Nekmahmud, and M. Fekete-Farkas, “How Do Environmental Knowledge, EcoLabel Knowledge, and Green Trust Impact Consumers’ Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Energy-Efficient Household Appliances?,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14116513. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.