Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 617, 2025
2024 International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2024)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 5
Section Multi-dimensional Study on Ecological Environment and Resource Utilisation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561701009
Published online 21 February 2025
  1. Adeleye AT, Akande AA, Odoh CK, Philip M, Fidelis TT, Amos PI, Banjoko OO. Efficient synthesis of bio-based activated carbon (AC) for catalytic systems: A green and sustainable approach. J Ind Eng Chem, 2021, 96: 59-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Salani G M, Rizzo E, Brombin V, et al. Carbon Soil Mapping in a Sustainable-Managed Farm in Northeast Italy: Geochemical and Geophysical Applications[J]. 2024. [Google Scholar]
  3. Altwala A, Mokaya R. Predictable and targeted activation of biomass to carbons with high surface area density and enhanced methane storage capacity. Energ Environ Sci, 2020, 13: 2967-2978. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Upchurch G R, Marino B D. Plant Cuticle: A Geochemical and Biophysical Sensor of the Carbon Cycle[J]. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Martinez-Braceras J D T J. Physical and geochemical record of an early Eocene carbon-cycle perturbation on a turbiditic continental margin[J]. Sedimentology: Journal of the International Association of Sedimentologists, 2021, 68(2). [Google Scholar]
  6. Balan S A, Welsh H, Amundson R. Comparative C, N, and S cycling along a Californian grassland chronosequence[J]. Geoderma, 2023, 439: 116682. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jerden J, Mejbel M, Antonio Nilson Zamunér Filho, et al. The impact of geochemical and life-cycle variables on carbon dioxide removal by enhanced rock weathering: Development and application of the Stella ERW model[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2024, 167. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao W. Advances in Geochemical Monitoring Technologies for CO2 Geological Storage[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cen C, Xu Z. Forest ecosystem responses to environmental changes: the key regulatory role of biogeochemical cycling[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010, 10: 210-214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mcgivern B B, Cronin D R, Ellenbogen J B, et al. Microbial polyphenol metabolism is part of the thawing permafrost carbon cycle[J]. Nature Microbiology, 2024, 9(6): 1454-1466. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li Y, Tang S, Xi C Z. Microbial distribution characteristics related to carbon cycle and their potential impact on methanogenesis of coal reservoirs in underground in situ environments[J]. Environment and history, 2024, 30(1): 40-51. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jaffe A L, Bardot C, Anne-Hélène. Le Jeune, et al. Variable impact of geochemical gradients on the functional potential of bacteria, archaea, and phages from the permanently stratified Lac Pavin[J]. Microbiome, 2023, 11(1): 14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olson J S, Garrels R M, Berner R A, et al. The natural carbon cycle[J]. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and the global carbon cycle, 1985, 239: 175-214. Rodionov A, Amelung W, Peinemann N, et al. Black carbon in grassland ecosystems of the world[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2010, 24(3). [Google Scholar]
  14. Jenerette G D, Park I W, Andrews H M, et al. Biogeochemical cycling of carbon and Nitrogen in chaparral dominated ecosystems[J]. Valuing Chaparral: Ecological, Socio-Economic, and Management Perspectives, 2018: 141-179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lal R. Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle[J]. Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2004, 70: 103-116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi X, Wu B, Qiao S, et al. Distribution, burial fluxes and carbon sink effect of sedimentary organic carbon in the eastern China seas[J]. SCIENCE CHINA Earth Sciences, 2024, 67(10). [Google Scholar]
  17. Forbes M S, Jerden J, Mejbel M, Antonio Nilson Zamunér Filho, et al. The impact of geochemical and life-cycle variables on carbon dioxide removal by enhanced rock weathering: Development and application of the Stella ERW model[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2024, 167. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pogodaeva T, Khodzher T. Organic Carbon in the Bottom Sediments of Lake Baikal: Geochemical Processes of Burial and Balance Values[J]. Water (20734441), 2023, 15(16). [Google Scholar]
  19. Song Z, Müller K, Wang H. Biogeochemical silicon cycle and carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 139: 268-278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yu L, Li S, Wu K. A natural analogue for carbon capture and storage: Petrographic and geochemical changes in sandstone after CO2 emplacement in the Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2023, 107(4): 643-683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oelkers E H, Gislason S R. CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE: FROM GLOBAL CYCLES TO GLOBAL SOLUTIONS[J]. Geochemical Perspectives, 2023, 12(2): 179-346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kirichenko Y, Rickli J D, Bontognali T R R, et al. Insights into stable strontium isotope fractionation in marine gypsum and its geochemical implications[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2024, 378: 270-285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Inoue Y, Okiyama R, Hagiwara Y, et al. Raman spectroscopic evaluation of precision of oxygen isotope ratio of carbon dioxide[J]. GEOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cao W. Advances in Geochemical Monitoring Technologies for CO2 Geological Storage[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Harsha M L, Whisenhant E A, Hebert D, et al. Photodissolution of Rare Earth Elements and Dissolved Organic Carbon from Subbituminous Coal: Effects of Environmental Variables and Implications for Biogeochemical Cycling[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2023, 10(9): 747-754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pandao M R, Lalitha G R, Kishore A J, et al. A Comprehensive Review on Biochar[J]. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 2023, 13(11): 3453-3461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.