EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 622 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 622 (2025) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 622, 2025
2nd International Conference on Environment, Green Technology, and Digital Society (INTERCONNECTS 2024)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 9
Section ICT and Computer Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562203004
Published online 04 April 2025
  1. Miterianifa, M.; Ashadi, A.; Saputro, S.; Suciati, S. Higher Order Thinking Skills in the 21st Century: Critical Thinking. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Science, Humanities, Education and Society Development, ICONS 2020, 30 November, Tegal, Indonesia; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hidayat, R.; Nugroho, I.; Zainuddin, Z.; Ingai, T.A. A Systematic Review of Analytical Thinking Skills in STEM Education Settings. Inf. Learn. Sci. 2023, ahead-of-p, doi:10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0070. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wahyuningtyas, I.N.; Widiyono, A. The Effect of STEM-Based Discovery Learning Model on Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students on Fraction Topics in the Context of Islamic Education. J. Tarbiyatuna 2024, 15, 139–157. [Google Scholar]
  4. Widana, I.W.; Suarta, I.M.; Citrawan, I.W. Work Motivation and Creativity on Teacher Ability to Develop HOTS-Based Assessments. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2019, 3, 188–200. [Google Scholar]
  5. Miró-Pérez, A.P. World Economic Forum: Present and Future. Dimens. Empres. 2020, 18, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Adzidzah, N.; Yudiawan, A. HOTS-Based Formative Assessment: The Key to Improving The Quality of Learning. J. Qual. Assur. Islam. Educ. 2024, 4, 109–120. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tonegawa, Y. Education in SDGs: What Is Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education? In Sustainable Development Disciplines for Humanity: Breaking Down the 5Ps— People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, and Partnerships; Springer, 2022; pp. 55–70. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nugroho, I.; Wilujeng, I.; Pujaningsih, P.; Iman, M.S.; Witanti, W.; Arifah, A. Analysis of HOTS Content in the Science Process Skills Students’ and Teachers’ Handbook of the Merdeka Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 5th Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2023; Atlantis Press, 2024; pp. 1143–1154. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ghani, I.B.A.; Ibrahim, N.H.; Yahaya, N.A.; Surif, J. Enhancing Students’ HOTS in Laboratory Educational Activity by Using Concept Map as an Alternative Assessment Tool. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2017, 18, 849–874. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rochmat, C.S.; Yoranita, A.S.P.Y.; Prihatini, M.; Wibawa, B.A. The Quality of Education from Islamic Perspective Analysis of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Facing the Society 5.0 Era. J. Tarbiyatuna 2023, 14, 75–93. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nugroho, I.; Wilujeng, I.; Pujaningsih, P. How Elementary Science Teachers’ Understand Perform Science Process Skills and HOTS. In Proceedings of the 5th Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2023; Atlantis Press, 2024; pp. 159–165. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mala, A.; Zulkarnain, Z.; Marpuah, S.; Badriyah, L. Towards Sustainable Inclusive Education: Challenges and Reconstruction of PAI Learning Methods in Islamic Boarding School Education. J. Tarbiyatuna 2024, 15, 116–125. [Google Scholar]
  13. Howley, A.; Wood, L.; Hough, B. Rural Elementary School Teachers’ Technology Integration. J. Res. Rural Educ. 2011, 26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Anderson, L.W.; Krathwohl, D.R. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition; Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., 2001; ISBN 0321084055. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brookhart, S.M. How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom; Ascd, 2010; ISBN 1416610480. [Google Scholar]
  16. Trilling, B.; Fadel, C. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times; John Wiley & Sons, 2009; ISBN 047055391X. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, H.; Sefcik, J.S.; Bradway, C. Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Res. Nurs. Health 2017, 40, 23–42. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goode, J. Mind the Gap: The Digital Dimension of College Access. J. Higher Educ. 2010, 81, 583–618. [Google Scholar]
  19. Suryawan, A.; Evalina, E.; Wulandani, N. Rulisca: Science Learning Media for Elementary School Students. Community Empower. 2024, 9, 739–744, doi:10.31603/ce.10899. [Google Scholar]
  20. McMahon, G. Getting the HOTS with What’s in the Box: Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills within a Technology-Rich Learning Environment 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sánchez-Cruzado, C.; Santiago Campión, R.; Sánchez-Compaña, M.T. Teacher Digital Literacy: The Indisputable Challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1858. [Google Scholar]
  22. Anthony, G.; Averill, R.; Drake, M. Occasioning Teacher-Educators’ Learning through Practice-Based Teacher Education. Math. Teach. Educ. Dev. 2018, 20, 4–19. [Google Scholar]
  23. Neary, M. Supporting Students’ Learning and Professional Development through the Process of Continuous Assessment and Mentorship. Nurse Educ. Today 2000, 20, 463–474. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu-lin, C. The Impact of Technology-Integrated Instruction to Elementary Students’ Language Learning Motivation and Performance. J. Lit. Art Stud. 2015, 5, 679–685. [Google Scholar]
  25. Motteram, G. A Context-Based Approach to Web 2.0 and Language Education. In Web Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications; IGI Global, 2010; pp. 1141–1158. [Google Scholar]
  26. Paramesvary, A. Analyses of Training Needs of In-Service Teachers in Fostering Higher Order Thinking Skills in Science Teaching 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. Thelma, C.C.; Phiri, E.V. The Efficacy and Acceptance of Online Learning vs. Offline Learning in Higher Learning Institutions: A Systematic Review. 2024. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.