Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 645, 2025
The 1st International Conference on Green Engineering for Sustainable Future (ICoGESF 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 06013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Educational Sciences | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564506013 | |
| Published online | 28 August 2025 | |
- R. Conijn, A. Van den Beemt, and P. Cuijpers, Predicting student performance in a blended MOOC. J Comput Assist Learn. 34, 615 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12270 [Google Scholar]
- H. Jiang, A. Y. M. A. Islam, X. Gu, J. M. Spector, and S. Chen, Technology-Enabled E-Learning Platforms in Chinese Higher Education During the Pandemic Age of COVID-19. Sage Open. 12, 2 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095085 [Google Scholar]
- H.-W. Tseng, Y.-C. Kuo, H.-T. Yeh, and Y. Tang, Relationships between Connectedness, Performance Proficiency, Satisfaction, and Online Learning Continuance. On Learn. 26, 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i1.2637 [Google Scholar]
- S. Ahmadi, Z. Nourmohamadzadeh, and B. Amiri, A hybrid DEMATEL and social network analysis model to identify factors affecting learners’ satisfaction with MOOCs. Heliyon. 9, 7 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17894 [Google Scholar]
- I. Firdaus, B. Surarso, Application of fuzzy Servqual method to measure user satisfaction of MOOC service quality, in Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, (2020) [Google Scholar]
- Zobel & Renz, Improving the scalability of MOOC platforms with automated, dialogue-based systems, in Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 2nd German Education Conference (GECon), August (2023), pp. 1-6, IEEE. [Google Scholar]
- D. Kim, Exploring the structural relationships between course design factors, learner commitment, self-directed learning, and intentions for further learning in a self-paced MOOC. Comput. Educ. 166, 104171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104171 [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Khan, V. Vivek, M. K. Nabi, M. Khojah, and M. Tahir, Students’ perception towards e-learning during COVID-19 pandemic in India: An empirical study. Sustainability 13, 57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010057 [Google Scholar]
- H. Hasanah and E. Hotnaidah Saragih, The effect of training methods on the performance of Gen Z employees in Jakarta. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Stud. 6, 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i9-07 [Google Scholar]
- F. Martin, V. P. Dennen, and C. J. Bonk, A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 68, 1613 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2 [Google Scholar]
- C. R. Ucha, Role of course relevance and course content quality in MOOCs acceptance and use. Comput. Educ. 5, 100147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100147 [Google Scholar]
- M. F. Vizcaya-Moreno and R. M. Pérez-Cañaveras, Social media used and teaching methods preferred by Generation Z students in the nursing clinical learning environment: A cross-sectional research study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17, 8267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218267 [Google Scholar]
- S. Shorey, V. Chan, P. Rajendran, and E. Ang, Learning styles, p and needs of Generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Educ. Pract. 57, 103247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247 [Google Scholar]
- M. Hashem, E. Sfeir, H. J. Hejase, and A. J. Hejase, Effect of online training on employee engagement during the COVID-19 era. Asian Bus. Res. 7, 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.20849/abr.v7i5.1294https://doi.org/10.1108/qae-03-2021-0043 [Google Scholar]
- G. Chopra, P. Madan, P. Jaisingh, and P. Bhaskar, Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 16, 94 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-05-2018-0027 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.