Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 677, 2025
The 3rd International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (3rd ICDMM 2025)
Article Number 06011
Number of page(s) 7
Section Physical Infrastructure Management and Recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567706011
Published online 12 December 2025
  1. N. Sultana, Landslide mitigation strategies in southeast Bangladesh: Lessons learned from the institutional responses. Cogent Social Sciences 6, 1737402 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102402 [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Pfurtscheller and E. Genovese, The Felbertauern landslide of 2013 in Austria: Impact on transport networks, regional economy and policy decisions. Case Studies on Transport Policy 7, 643 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Corominas, The angle of reach as a mobility index for small and large landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 33, 260-271 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1139/T96-005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. C. R. Quintero, J. D. O. Contreras, M. A. T. Camacho, and E. R. Oviedo-Ocaña, Empirical estimation of landslide runout distance using geometrical approximations in the Colombian North–East Andean Region. Sustainability 16, 793 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020793 [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Wu, W. Li, P. Liu, H. Bai, Q. Wang, J. He, Y. Liu, and S. Sun, Application of the analytic hierarchy process model for landslide susceptibility mapping in Gangu County, Gansu Province, China. Environ Earth Sci 75, 422 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5194-916 [Google Scholar]
  6. I. K. Tasoglu, H. Keskin Citiroglu, and C. Mekik, GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study in Kelemen Valley (Yenice Karabuk, NW Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 75, 1291 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6098-z [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Lanfranconi, P. Frattini, F. Agliardi, G. M. Stock, B. D. Collins, and G. Crosta, Field evidence and indicators of rockfall fragmentation and implications for mobility. Engineering Geology 341, 107704 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107704 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Kinde, E. Getahun, and M. Jothimani, Geotechnical and slope stability analysis in the landslide-prone area: A case study in Sawla – Laska road sector, Southern Ethiopia. Scientific African 23, p. e02071, (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02071 [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Kayastha, Landslide susceptibility mapping and factor effect analysis using frequency ratio in a catchment scale: A case study from Garuwa sub-basin, East Nepal. Arab J Geosci 8, 8601 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1831-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Çellek, Effect of the slope angle and its classification on landslides. Himalayan Geology 43(1), 85 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2020-87 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Peruzzetto, A. Mangeney, G. Grandjean, C. Levy, Y. Thiery, J. Rohmer, and A. Lucas, Operational estimation of landslide runout: comparison of empirical and numerical methods, Geosciences 10, 424 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10110424 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Firmansyah, S. Feranie, A. Tohari, and F. D. E. Latief, Prediction of landslide run-out distance based on slope stability analysis and center of mass approach, IOP Conf. Ser..: Earth Environ. Sci. Vol. 29, pp 012003, Semarang, Indonesia (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/29/1/012003 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. W. Apriani, C. Credidi, and S. Khala, An empirical-statistical model for landslide runout distance prediction in Indonesia. Pondasi 27, 15 (2022) https://doi.org/10.30659/pondasi.v27i1.22618 [Google Scholar]
  14. D. W. Apriani, A. P. Salsabila, C. C. Khala, and M. Silfiani, Landslide distance prediction based on slope geometry and rock type parameters, Bentang 11, 197 (2023) (in Bahasa Indonesia) https://doi.org/10.33558/bentang.v11i2.6950 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Qarinur, Landslide runout distance prediction based on the mechanism and cause of soil or rock mass movement. Jou. of the Civ. Eng. For 1, (2015) https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.22728 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.