Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 688, 2026
The 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment, Development, and Energy (CONSER 2025)
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 8
Section The Role of Geosciences in Sustainability, Disaster Mitigation, and Resource Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668801020
Published online 20 January 2026
  1. G. E. Adjovu, H. Stephen, D. James, S. Ahmad, Overview of the application of remote sensing in effective monitoring of water quality parameters. Remote Sensing. 15(7) 1938 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071938. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. S. Bilotta, R. E. Brazier, Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water research. 42(12), 2849–2861 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Khalid, S. K. Shamim, A. Ahmad, Synergistic approach for land use and land cover dynamics prediction in Uttarakhand using cellular automata and Artificial neural network. Geomatica. 76(2), 100017 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomat.2024.100017 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Sales, Country Report on the Platforms on Water Resilience and Disasters: Davao River Basin Management. (2021). https://tinyurl.com/2mcnznkd. [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Liu, W. Li, G. Zhu, H. Zhou, H. Yan, P. Xue, Land Use/Land cover changes and their driving factors in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau based on geographical detectors and Google Earth Engine: a case study in Gannan Prefecture. Remote Sensing. 12(19), 3139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193139 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Hashim, N. Nayan, D. L. Setyowati, Z. M. Said, H. Mahat, Y. Saleh, Analysis of water quality trends using the Mann-Kendall Test and SEN's estimator of slope in a tropical river basin. Pollution. 7(4), 933–942 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22059/poll.2021.325794.1118 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. G. Congalton, A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 37(1), 35–46 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Rosenfield, K. Fitzpatrick-Lins, A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 52(2), 223–227. (1986) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. M. Foody, Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification. Remote Sensing of Environment. 239, 111630. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111630 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. R. Landis, G. G. Koch, (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33(1), 159 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  11. Q. Bao Pham, S. Ajim Ali, F. Parvin, V. Van On, L. Mohd Sidek, B. Burin, V. Cetl, S. Samanovic, N. Minh Nguyet, Multi-spectral remote sensing and GIS-based analysis for decadal land use land cover changes and future prediction using random forest tree and artificial neural network. Advances in Space Research. 74(1), 17–47 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.027 [Google Scholar]
  12. H.B. Mann, Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica. 13(3), 245 (1945). https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Lambert, R.O. Gilbert, Statistical Methods for Environmental pollution monitoring. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 83(404), 1226 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2290180 [Google Scholar]
  14. M.G. Kendall, Rank correlation methods. Biometrika. 44(1/2), 298 (1957). https://doi.org/10.2307/2333282 [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Mulatu, K. Hundera, F. Senbeta, Analysis of land use/ land cover changes and landscape fragmentation in the Baro-Akobo Basin, Southwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(7), e 28378 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.heliyon.2024.e28378 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.