Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 706, 2026
3rd International Conference on Environment, Green Technology, and Digital Society (INTERCONNECTS 2025)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental and Health Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670601014
Published online 21 April 2026
  1. F. Rosero, C. X. Rosero, and C. Segovia, “Towards Simpler Approaches for Assessing Fuel Efficiency and CO2 Emissions of Vehicle Engines in Real Traffic Conditions Using On-Board Diagnostic Data,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 19, p. 4814, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17194814. [Google Scholar]
  2. J. D. K. Bishop, M. E. J. Stettler, N. Molden, and A. M. Boies, “Engine maps of fuel use and emissions from transient driving cycles,” Applied Energy, vol. 183, pp. 202–217, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.175. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Mądziel, “Predictive methods for CO2 emissions and energy use in vehicles at intersections,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 6463, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91300-9. [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Giakoumis and A. Zachiotis, “Investigation of a Diesel-Engined Vehicle’s Performance and Emissions during the WLTC Driving Cycle—Comparison with the NEDC,” Energies, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 240, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.3390/en10020240. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. I. Meneguette, G. P. R. Filho, D. L. Guidoni, G. Pessin, L. A. Villas, and J. Ueyama, “Increasing Intelligence in Inter-Vehicle Communications to Reduce Traffic Congestions: Experiments in Urban and Highway Environments,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 8, p. e0159110, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159110. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Malik and R. Nandal, “A framework on driving behavior and pattern using On-Board diagnostics (OBD-II) tool,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 80, pp. 3762–3768, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.376. [Google Scholar]
  7. V. V. Gavimath and S. Ravuri, “Developing Real-World Drive Cycles for Heavy-Duty Freight Vehicles using On-Board Diagnostics Data,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 82, pp. 158–174, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.035. [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Du, X. Kang, Y. Gao, and X. Wang, “Driving behavior characterization and traffic emission analysis considering the vehicle trajectory,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, p. 1341611, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1341611. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. A. Abas, S. Rajoo, and S. F. Zainal Abidin, “Development of Malaysian urban drive cycle using vehicle and engine parameters,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 63, pp. 388–403, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.05.015. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Montazeri-Gh and M. Naghizadeh, “Development Of Car Drive Cycle For Simulation Of Emissions And Fuel Economy”. [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Alqasrawi, M. Azzeh, and Y. Elsheikh, “Locally weighted regression with different kernel smoothers for software effort estimation,” Science of Computer Programming, vol. 214, p. 102744, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2021.102744. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Torres and W. V. Srubar, “Characterizing statistical uncertainty and variability of building material emissions in probabilistic whole-building life cycle assessment using kernel density estimation,” Building and Environment, vol. 284, p. 113442, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113442. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Ma, H. Lu, M. Ma, L. Wu, and Y. Cai, “Urban natural gas consumption forecasting by novel wavelet-kernelized grey system model,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 119, p. 105773, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105773. [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Gebisa, G. Gebresenbet, R. Gopal, and R. B. Nallamothu, “Driving Cycles for Estimating Vehicle Emission Levels and Energy Consumption,” Future Transportation, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 615–638, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/futuretransp1030033. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. J. Edwards, “Aggressive-dynamics metrics for drive-cycle characterization,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 14, p. 100592, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100592. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.