Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04044 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Energy Efficiency, Conservation, Renewable Energy, and Embodied Carbon | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671604044 | |
| Published online | 09 June 2026 | |
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). State of the Markets Report | 2024. Staff Report. (Mar. 20, 2025). Accessed January 8, 2026. https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2025-03/25State-of-the-Market03201200.pdf [Google Scholar]
- J.D. Wilson, Z. Zimmerman, R. Gramlich. Strategic Industries Surging: Driving US Power Demand. GridStrategies LLC / Clean Grid Initiative; (Dec. 2024). https://gridstrategiesllc.com/wp-content/uploads/National-Load-Growth-Report-2024.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Mango M, Casey JA, Hernandez D. Resilient Power: A home-based electricity generation and storage solution for the medically vulnerable during climate- induced power outages. Futures. 128:102707. (2021). doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102707 [Google Scholar]
- Khalid A, Stevenson A, Sarwat AI. Overview of Technical Specifications for Grid-Connected Microgrid Battery Energy Storage Systems. IEEE Access. 9: 163554-163593. (2021). doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3132223 [Google Scholar]
- D. Gautam, N. Bolia. Fostering second-life applications for electric vehicle batteries: A thorough exploration of barriers and solutions within the framework of sustainable energy and resource management. J. Clean. Prod. 456:142401. (2024). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142401 [Google Scholar]
- G. Raman, Y. Yang, J.C.H. Peng. The social factors shaping community microgrid operation. Nat. Commun. 15(1):6451. (2024). doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50736-9 [Google Scholar]
- C. Heymans, S.B. Walker, S.B. Young, M. Fowler. Economic analysis of second use electric vehicle batteries for residential energy storage and loadlevelling. Energy Policy. 71:22-30. (2014). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.016 [Google Scholar]
- L. Colarullo, J. Thakur. Second-life EV batteries for stationary storage applications in Local Energy Communities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 169:112913. (2022). doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112913 [Google Scholar]
- A. Zahoor, R. Kun, G. Mao, F. Farkas, A. Sapi, Z. Konya. Urgent needs for second life using and recycling design of wasted electric vehicles (EVs) lithium-ion battery: a scientometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31(30):43152-43173. (2024). doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33979-3 [Google Scholar]
- R. Madlener, A. Kirmas. Economic Viability of Second Use Electric Vehicle Batteries for Energy Storage in Residential Applications. Energy Procedia. 105:3806-3815. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.890 [Google Scholar]
- I. Mathews, B. Xu, W. He, V. Barreto, T. Buonassisi, I.M. Peters. Technoeconomic model of second-life batteries for utility-scale solar considering calendar and cycle aging. Appl. Energy. 269:115127. (2020). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115127 [Google Scholar]
- C. Zuo, X. Yan, Z. Chen, et al. Factors influencing residents’ inclination towards engaging in the recycling of electric vehicle batteries. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 12(1):1380. (2025). doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05704-z [Google Scholar]
- Y. Tang, Q. Zhang, B. Liu, Y. Li, R. Ni, Y. Wang. What influences residents’ intention to participate in the electric vehicle battery recycling? Evidence fromChina. Energy. 276:127563. (2023). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127563 [Google Scholar]
- O. Okorie, Y. Singh, N.V. Emodi. Consumer Acceptance and Preferences Based on Environment Knowledge to Inform Remanufacturing End-of-Life Approach for Electric Vehicle Battery: A Scoping Review Study. In: Advances in Remanufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer Nature Switzerland; 77-91. (2024). doi:: 10.1007/9783-031-52649-77 [Google Scholar]
- M. Terkes, A. Demirci, Z. Ozturk, U. Cali. Strategic Integration of Second-Life Batteries: Incentive Mechanisms for Boosting Community Energy SelfConsumption. IEEE Access. 12:125768-125785. (2024). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3429578 [Google Scholar]
- C.A. Rufino Jùnior, E. Riva Sanseverino, P. Gallo, et al. Towards to Battery Digital Passport: Reviewing Regulations and Standards for Second- Life Batteries. Batteries. 10(4):115. (2024). doi:10.3390/batteries10040115 [Google Scholar]
- J.W. Creswell, C.N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Fourth edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; (2018). [Google Scholar]
- Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) - Energy Information Administration. Accessed Jan. 8, 2026. https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/ [Google Scholar]
- C. Beck, A. Helverson, J.K. Ghosh. Household Preparedness for Severe Storms, Flooding, and Power Outages Among U.S. Adults. Heluna Health; (Sep. 2024). Accessed Jan. 10, 2026. [Google Scholar]
- M. Alkhalil, S. Mohaidat, J. Bak, et al. Integration of Reconfigurable Battery Systems in the Built Environment. In: IECON 2024 - 50th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE; 1-5. (2024). doi: 10.1109/IECON55916.2024.10905547 [Google Scholar]
- Y. Tang, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, G. Wang, Y. Li. Recycling mechanisms and policy suggestions for spent electric vehicles’ power battery -A case of Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 186:388-406. (2018). doi:10.1016/ijclepro.2018.03.043 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Qualtrics XM: The Leading Experience Management Software -Accessed Jan 8, 2026. https://www.qualtrics.com/ [Google Scholar]
- F. Bolanos, A. Salatino, F. Osborne, E. Motta. Artificial Intelligence for Literature Reviews: Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv. Preprint on Aug. 6, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.08565 [Google Scholar]
- N. Fabiano, A. Gupta, N. Bhambra, B. Luu, S. Wong, M. Maaz, J.G. Fiedorowicz, A.L. Smith, M. Solmi. How to optimize the systematic review process using AI tools. JCPP Adv. 4(2):e12234. (2024). doi:10.1002/jcv2.12234 [Google Scholar]
- Consensus: AI for Research. Accessed January 8, 2026. https://consensus.app/search/ [Google Scholar]
- Google NotebookLM | AI Research Tool & Thinking Partner. Google NotebookLM. Accessed Jan. 8, 2026. https://notebooklm.google/ [Google Scholar]
- K. Charmaz. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Reprinted. London: SAGE; (2012). [Google Scholar]
- A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie, A. O'Cathain. Assessing the Quality of Mixed Methods Research: Toward a Comprehensive Framework. In: SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 531-556. (2010). doi:10.4135/9781506335193 [Google Scholar]
- M. Gharebaghi, O. Rezaei, C. Li, Z. Wang, Y. Tang. A Survey on Using Second-Life Batteries in Stationary Energy Storage Applications. Energies. 18(1):42. (2024). doi:10.3390/en18010042 [Google Scholar]
- S. Prenner, F. Part, S. Jung-Waclik, et al. Barriers and framework conditions for the market entry of second-life lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Heliyon. 10(18): e37423. (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37423 [Google Scholar]
- J. Twitchell. A Review of State-Level Policies on Electrical Energy Storage. Curr. Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep. 6(2):35-41. (2019). doi:10.1007/s40518-019-00128-1 [Google Scholar]
- M.K. Al-Alawi, J. Cugley, H. Hassanin. Techno- economic feasibility of retired electric-vehicle batteries repurpose/reuse in second-life applications: A systematic review. Energy Clim. Change. 3:100086. (2022). doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100086 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

