EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 07007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 07007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Critical infrastructure and cascading impacts
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160707007
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. KrögerW. (2008). Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93 (2008), 1781–1787. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. HallegatteS. and PrzyluskiV. (2010). The Economics of Natural Disasters. CESifo Forum, Summer 2010, 11 (2), 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  3. KrögerW. and ZioE. (2011). Vulnerable Systems, Springer, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. INTACT project web site (www.intact-project.eu). [Google Scholar]
  5. INTACT wiki web site (http://scm.ulster.ac.uk/~scmresearch/intact/index.php/INTACT_Wiki) [Google Scholar]
  6. MäkiK., ForssenK. and Vidar VangelstenB. (2015). Factors Contributing to CI Vulnerability and Resilience, INTACT Deliverable D3.2, project cofunded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Tampere, Finland. [Google Scholar]
  7. Munich Re, 2011, Topics Geo Natural catastrophes 2010: Analyses, assessments, positions. Tech. rep. Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
  8. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) (2010). “Disaster Data: A Balanced Perspective”, CRED CRUNCH Issue No. 22, November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. European Climate Assessment & Dataset project (http://www.ecad.eu/). [Google Scholar]
  10. Klein TankAMG, ZwiersFW, ZhangX, 2009, Guidelines on Analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaptation, WMO Geneva p.56 (WCDMP-72, WMOTD/ No. 1500). [Google Scholar]
  11. FischerD., ThomasS.M., SukJ.E., SudreB., HessA., TjadenN.B., BeierkuhnleinC. and SemenzaJ.C. (2013). Climate change effects on Chikungunya transmission in Europe: geospatial analysis of vector’s climatic suitability and virus’ temperature requirements, Int J Health Geogr. 2013 Nov 12;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-51. [Google Scholar]
  12. BucchignaniE. and GutierrezJ.M. (2015). “Definition of different EWIs, to support the management of European CI”, INTACT Deliverable D2.1, project co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme. [Google Scholar]
  13. van RuitenK., BlesT. and KielJ. (2016). EUINTACT-case studies: Impact of extreme weather on critical Infrastructure, Proceedings of 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management, 18 – 20 October 2016 - Lyon, France [Google Scholar]
  14. EidsvigU. and TaggA. (2015): SOTA of Modelling and Simulation Approaches, used currently to assess CI vulnerability, INTACT Deliverable D4.1, project co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  15. RäikkönenM. and TaggA. (2015): Report on Proposed Modelling and Simulation Structure, INTACT Deliverable D4.2, project co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme, Tampere, Finland. [Google Scholar]
  16. IEC/BSI (2010). Risk management. Risk assessment techniques. BS EN 31010:2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. International Risk Governance Council (2012). An introduction to the IRGC Risk Governance Framework, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. de BruijnK.M., LipsN.,GersoniusB. and MiddelkoopH. (2015). The storyline approach: a new way to analyse and improve flood event management, Natural Hazards, March 2016, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 99–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Circle application (https://www.deltares.nl/app/uploads/2015/04/Productbla d-CIrcle.pdf [Google Scholar]
  20. Finnish Energy. (2014). Verkon rakenne. Retrieved December 23, 2015, from http://energia.fi/sahkomarkkinat/sahkoverkko/verkon-rakenne. [Google Scholar]
  21. Forssén, Kim. (2016). Resilience of Finnish electricity distribution network against extreme weather conditions, Master’s thesis, Aalto University, Finland. [Google Scholar]
  22. LakerviE., & PartanenJ. (2008). Sähkönjakelutekniikka. Gaudeamus. [Google Scholar]
  23. MäkiK., ForssénK. & Vidar VangelstenB. (eds.) (2015) Factors Contributing to CI Vulnerability and Resilience, INTACT Deliverable D3.2, INTACT project co-funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme. [Google Scholar]
  24. MolariusR., LeviäkangasP., RöntyJ. and OivaK. (Eds.). 2012. Weather hazards and vulnerabilities for the European transport system – a risk panorama. Espoo 2012. VTT Technology 43. 95 p. + app. 13 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. The Nordic Forum for Emergency Matters regarding the Power Sector (2005) Nordic Contingency Planning and Crisis Management, Report, Edition no. 1, 20015 12 15, 31 p. [Google Scholar]
  26. VajdaA., TuomenvirtaH., JokinenP., MakkonenL., TikanmäkiM., GroenemeijerP., SaarikiviP., MichaelidesS. & PapadakisM. (2011): D2.1 Probabilities of Adverse Weather Affecting Transport in Europe: Climatology and Scenarios up to the 2050s. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.