Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conferences
Volume 44, 2018
10th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2018
Article Number 00195
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184400195
Published online 03 July 2018
  1. M.G. Macklin, J. Lewin, J. Quat. Sci. 18, 101 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Forzieri, F. Castelli, F. Preti, Int. J. Remote Sens. 33/2, 630 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Blöschl, L. Gaál, J. Hall, A. Kiss, J. Komma, T. Nester, J. Parajka, R.A.P. Perdigão, L. Plavcová, M. Rogger, J.L. Salinas, A. Viglione, WIREs Water 2, 329 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z.W. Kundzewicz, Changes in Flood Risk in Europe (CRC Press, Wallingford, 2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Teng, A.J. Jakeman, J. Vaze, B.F.W. Croke, D. Dutta, S. Kim, Environ. Modell. Softw. 90, 201 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Mandlburger, C. Hauer, B. Höfle, H. Habersack, N. Pfeifer, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13, 1453 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Dorn, M. Vetter, B. Höfle, Remote Sens. 6, 1739 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Walczak, M. Hammerling, M. Spychała, J. Niec, J. Ecol. Eng 16/5, 160 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. V.T. Chow, Open-Channel Hydraulics (McGraw-Hill, Tokyo, 1959) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Straatsma, M. J. Baptist, Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 1062 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G.J Arcement, V.R Schneider, Guide for Selecting Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Natural Channels and Flood Plains (U.S. Geological Survey Water, Denver, 1989) [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Kouwen, J. Irrig. Drain Eng. 118, 559 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Zahidi, Y. Badronnisa, M. Cope, Research in Civil and Environ. Eng. 2, 1 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Straatsma, F. Huthoff, Phys. Chem. Earth 36, 324 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Forzieri, L. Guarnieri, E.R. Vivoni, F. Castelli, F. Preti, River Res. Appl 27, 826 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Forzieri, M. Degetto, M. Righetti, F. Castelli, F. Preti, J. Hydrol 407, 41 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Medeiros, S.C. Hagen, J.F. Weishampel, J Hydrol 452-453, 139 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Tymkow, Application of photogrammetric and remote sensing methods for identification of resistance coefficients of high water flow in river valleys (Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wroclawiu, Wroclaw, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Tyminski, Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu. Monografie. 36, 49 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  20. B.C. Yen, J. Hydraul. Eng. 128, 20 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Järvelä, Flow resistance in environmental channels: Focus on vegetation (Helsinki University of Technology Water Resources Publications, Espoo, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  22. D.C.M. Augustijn, F. Huthoff, E.H. van Velzen, Proceedings of River Flow 2008 – 4th International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, Izmir, Turkey, 343 (Ankara Kubaba Congress Department and Travel Services, Ankara, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  23. W.L. Cowan, Agricultural Engineering 37, 473 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  24. H. Nepf, J. Hydraul. Res. 50, 262 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. DHI, MIKE FLOOD. 1D-2D Modelling. User Manual. (DHI, Hørsholm, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. DHI, MIKE 21 Flow Model and MIKE 21 Flood Screening Tool. Hydrodynamic Module. Scientific Documentation (DHI, Hørsholm, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Gharbi, A. Soualmia, D. Dartus, L. Masbernat, J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 7, 3017 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. ASPRS, LAS Specification Version 1.2 (ASPRS, Bethesda, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  29. K. Bakula, Archiwum Fotogrametrii, Kartografii i Teledetekcji 26, 23 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  30. O. Conrad, B. Bechtel, M. Bock, H. Dietrich, E. Fischer, L. Gerlitz, J. Wehberg, V. Wichmann, J. Boehner, Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 1991 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Schmidts, Esri ArcGIS Desktop Associate Certification Study Guide (ESRI Press, Redlands, 2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.