Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 50, 2018
XII Congreso Internacional Terroir
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Percepción del Terroir por el consumidor
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185003002
Published online 22 August 2018
  1. C.M. Hall. Wine tourism in New Zealand In G. Kearsley (ed) Tourism Down Under II, Towards a More Sustainable Tourism Conference Proceedings. 99, 109-119. Centre for Tourism, University of Otago (1996) [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Qayum, S. Gold, Y. Glemarec Multi-Stakeholder Decision-Making A Guidebook for Establishing a Multi-Stakeholder Decision-Making Process to Support Green, Low-Emission and Climate-Resilient Development Strategies, United Nations Development Programme, UNDP (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. R. E. Freeman. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman (1984) [Google Scholar]
  4. T.I. Nwanji, K.E. Howell. Shareholdership, stakeholdership and the modern global business environment: A survey of the literature. Journal of interdisciplinary economics. 18, 4, 347-361 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. K. Thompson, S. L. Wartick, H.L. Smith, J. E. Post. Integrating Corporate Social Performance and Stakeholder Management: Implications for a Research Agenda in Small Business. IN PRESTON, L. E. (Ed.) Research in corporate social performance and policy. A Research Annual Greenwich, Conn. and London, JAI Press (1991) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. E. Freeman. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 4, 409-421 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Shrivastava. The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 4, 936-960 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Fineman, K. Clarke. Green stakeholders: Industry interpretations and response. Journal of Management studies, 33, 6, 715-730 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Azzone, M. Brophy, G. Noci, R. Welford W. Young. A stakeholders’ view of environmental reporting. Long range planning, 30, 5, 699-709 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Henriques, P. Sadorsky. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of management Journal, 42, 1, 87-99 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. J. Alvarez Gil, J. Burgos Jiménez, J.J. Céspedes Lorente. An analysis of environmental management, organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels, Omega, 29, 6, 457–471 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  12. B.R. Agle, T. Donaldson, R.E. Freeman, M.C. Jensen, R. K. Mitchel, D. J. Wood. Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 2, 153-190 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Céspedes-Lorente, J. Burgos-Jiménez, M. J. Álvarez-Gil. Stakeholders’ environmental influence. An empirical analysis in the Spanish hotel industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 19, 3, 333-358 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Rivera. Institutional Pressures and Voluntary Environmental Behavior in Developing Countries: Evidence From the Costa Rican Hotel Industry. Society & Natural Resources, 17, 1, 779-797 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Kasim. Towards a Wider Adoption of Environmental Responsibility in the Hotel Sector’, International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 8, 2, 25-49 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Campbell. Stakeholders: The case in favour. Long Range Planning 30, 446-49 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Baloglu, K. W. McCleary. US international pleasure travelers’ images of four Mediterranean destinations: A comparison of visitors and nonvisitors. Journal of Travel Research, 38, 2, 144-152 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Castaño, A. Moreno, S. García, A. Crego. Aproximación psicosocial a la motivación turística. Estudios turísticos, 158, 5-42 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  19. D.A. Baker, J. L. Crompton. Quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27, 3, 785-804 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Cervantes, A. González, N. Muñiz. La incidencia de los estilos de vida en la segmentación del mercado turístico: aplicación a la población urbana de Castilla y León. Revista de Investigación Económica y Social de Castilla y León, 2, 41-56 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  21. C. K. Lee, Y. K. Lee, B. E. Wicks. Segmentation of festival motivation by nationality and satisfaction. Tourism management, 25, 1, 61-70 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Beh, B. L. Bruyere. Segmentation by visitor motivation in three Kenyan national reserves. Tourism management, 28, 6, 1464-1471 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. H. Hsu, L. A. Cai, K. K. Wong. A model of senior tourism motivations–Anecdotes from Beijing and Shanghai. Tourism Management, 28, 5, 1262-1273 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Severt, Y. Wang, P. J. Chen, D. Breiter. Examining the motivation, perceived performance, and behavioral intentions of convention attendees: Evidence from a regional conference. Tourism Management, 28, 2, 399-408 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Devesa, M. Laguna, A. Palacios. The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: Empirical evidence in rural tourism. Tourism Management, 31, 4, 547-552 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G. M. Dann. Anomie ego-enhancement and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 4, 4, 184–194 (1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. L. Crompton. Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of tourism research, 6, 4, 408-424 (1979) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. G. M. Dann. Tourism Motivations: An appraisal. Annals of Tourism Research, 8, 2, 189–219 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Osorio, S. Franco, I.L. Ramírez, G. Nava, G. Novo, H. Hugo. El visitante del Parque Nacional Nevado de Toluca, México. Análisis del comportamiento en un área natural protegida. Investigaciones Geográficas, 76, 55-70 (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.