Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 89, 2019
The 2018 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2018)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Improved SCAL techniques and Interpretation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198902006
Published online 29 March 2019
  1. J.J. Sheng, “Critical review of low-salinity waterflooding”. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 120, 216–224 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Zhang, M.T. Tweheyo and T. Austad, “Wettability alteration and improved oil recovery by spontaneous imbibition of seawater into chalk: Impact of the potential determining ions Ca2+, Mg2+ and SO42-”. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 301(1–3), 199–208 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Strand, T. Austad, T. Puntervold, E.J. Høgnesen, M. Olsen and S.M.F. Barstad, “Smart water” for oil recovery from fractured limestone: a preliminary study. Energy & fuels, 22(5), 3126–3133 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Romanuka, J. Hofman, D.J. Ligthelm, B. Suijkerbuijk, F. Marcelis, S. Oedai, N. Brussee, H. van der Linde, H. Aksulu and T. Austad, “Low salinity EOR in carbonates ”, SPE 153869, SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Oklahoma, USA (2012),April 14-18 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ligthelm, D. J., Gronsveld, J., Hofman, J., Brussee, N., Marcelis, F., & van der Linde, H., “Novel Waterflooding Strategy By Manipulation Of Injection Brine Composition”, SPE 119835, EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (2009), June 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  6. R.A. Nasralla, H. Mahani, H.A. van der Linde, F.H. Marcelis, S.K. Masalmeh, E. Sergienko, N.J. Brussee, S.G. Pieterse and S. Basu, “Low Salinity Waterflooding for a carbonate reservoir: Experimental evaluation and numerical interpretation”. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. S.K. Masalmeh, T.G. Sorop, B.M. Suijkerbuijk, E.C. Vermolen, S. Douma, H.A. Van Del Linde and S.G.J. Pieterse, “Low salinity flooding: Experimental evaluation and numerical interpretation”,IPTC 17558, International Petroleum Technology ConferenceDoha, Qatar(2014), January 19-22 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Gupta, G.G. Smith, L. Hu, T. Willingham, M. Lo Cascio, J.J. Shyeh and C.R. Harris, “Enhanced waterflood for carbonate reservoirs-impact of injection water composition”, SPE 142668, SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain(2011), September 25-28 [Google Scholar]
  9. A.A. Yousef, S. Al-Saleh, A.U. Al-Kaabi and M.S. Al-Jawfi, “Laboratory investigation of novel oil recovery method for carbonate reservoirs”,SPE 137634, Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum ConferenceCalgary, Canada (2010), October, 19-21. [Google Scholar]
  10. G.R. Coates, J. Galford, D. Mardon, and D.Marschall, “A new characterization of bulk- volume irreducible using magnetic resonance”. The Log Analyst, 39, (01) (1998). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Chang, H.J. Vinegar, C. Morriss and C. Straley, “Effective porosity, producible fluid and permeability in carbonates from NMR logging”,SPWLA-1994-A, SPWLA 35th Annual Logging Symposium, Oklahoma, USA (1994)June 19-22. [Google Scholar]
  12. E.C. Donaldson, N. Ewall and B. Singh, “Characteristics of capillary pressure curves”. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 6(3), 249–261 (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Forbes, “Simple and accurate methods for converting centrifuge data into drainage and imbibition capillary pressure curves”. The Log Analyst, 35(04), 35–53 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  14. S.K. Masalmeh, “Impact of capillary forces on remaining oil saturation and flooding experiments for mixed to oil-wet carbonate reservoirs”, SCA2012-11, International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts., Aberdeen, Scotland, UK (2012).August 27-30. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.