EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 111 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 111 (2019) 04064 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 111, 2019
CLIMA 2019 Congress
Article Number 04064
Number of page(s) 8
Section High Energy Performance and Sustainable Buildings, Simulation models and predictive tools for the buildings HVAC, IEQ and energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911104064
Published online 13 August 2019
  1. Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. Factors Related to Household Energy Use and Intention to Reduce It: The Role of Psychological and Socio-Demographic Variables. Human ecology review, 18 (1), 30-40. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. (1991). [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura A., Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US (1986) [Google Scholar]
  4. Brannen, Julia. Mixing Methods: The Entry of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches into the Research Process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (3): 173–184 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  5. Creswell, John W., and Vicki L. Plano Clark. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. DeWalt, Kathleen M., and Billie R. DeWalt. Participant Observation. In Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, ed. H. Russell Bernard. Walnut Creek etc.: Altamira Press. 259–299 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  7. D’Oca S., Corgnati S., Pisello A.L., Hong T., Introduction to an occupant behavior motivation survey framework. Proceeding of the Clima 2016 Conference (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. D’Oca S, Chen C.F., Hong T., Synthesizing building physics with social science: An interdisciplinary framework for context and behavior in office buildings, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. (2017). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. D’Oca S, Pisello A.L., De Simone M, M. BarthelmesV., Hong T., Corgnati S.P. Human-building interaction at work: Findings from an interdisciplinary cross-country survey in Italy. Building and Environment 132 (132): 147-159 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. Hong H., D’Oca S., Taylor-Lange S.C., Turner W.J.N., Chen Y., Corgnati S.P., An ontology to represent energy-related occupant behavior in buildings. Part II: Implementation of the DNAS framework using an XML schema, Build. Environ. 94: 196–205 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., & Pacheco, R. C. D. S. The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jordan, Brigitte, and Brinda Dalal. Persuasive Encounters: Ethnography in the Corporation. Field Methods 18 (4): 1-24 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. Da Li, Carol C. Menassa, Aslihan Karatas. Energy use behaviors in buildings: Towards an integrated conceptual framework. Energy Research & Social Science (23): 97-112 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. Morgan, David L. 2014. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Los Angeles (CA): Sage. [Google Scholar]
  15. Morse, Janice M., and Linda Niehaus. 2009. Mixed Methods Design: Principles and Procedures. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Pretnar, Ajda, and Dan Podjed. 2018. Data Mining Workspace Sensors: A New Approach to Anthropology. In Language Technologies and Digital Humanities 2018 Conference Proceedings, eds. Darja Fišer and Andrej Pančur. 227-233. [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Shove, Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: the social organization of normality. Berg Publishers, Oxford and New York (2003) [Google Scholar]
  18. Sovacool, B.K. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research and Social Science, 1: 1–29 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. Sovacool, B.K., Ryan, S.E., Stern, P.C., Janda, K. Rochlin, G., Spreng, D., Pasqualetti, M.J., Wilhite, H., Lutzenhiser, L. Integrating social science in energy research. Energy Research & Social Science, 6: 95–99 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Stephenson, J., Lawson, R., Carrington, G., Barton, B., Thorsnes, P., & Mirosa, M. The practice of interdisciplinarity. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5 (7), 271-282 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  21. Teddlie, Charles, and Abbas Tashakkori. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioural Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. Von Grabe J., The systematic identification and organization of the context of energy-relevant human interaction with buildings - A pilot study in Germany, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 12: 75–95 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimberly S. Wolske, Paul C. Stern, Thomas Dietz. Explaining interest in adopting residential solar photovoltaic systems in the United States: Toward an integration of behavioral theories. Energy Research & Social Science (25): 134–151 (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.