E3S Web Conf.
Volume 146, 2020The 2019 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2019)
|Number of page(s)||11|
|Section||Improved SCAL Techniques and Interpretation|
|Published online||05 February 2020|
- C. McPhee, J. Reed and I. Zubizarreta, Core Analysis: A Best Practice Guide. Elsevier (2015). [Google Scholar]
- A. Cense, J. Reed and P. Egermann. “SCAL for gas reservoirs: a contribution for better experiments”. SCA 2016-023 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- D. Maloney, K. Doggett and R. Gilliland. “New procedure and apparatus for combined reservoir condition gas-brine relative permeability, capillary pressure and electrical property measurements”. SCA-9427 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- A.T. Corey. “The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities”. Producers Monthly, 19, 38-41, (1954). [Google Scholar]
- R. Pini, and S. Benson. “Simultaneous measurement of capillary pressure and relative permeability drainage curves”. Water Resources Research, 49, 3516-3530, (2013). [Google Scholar]
- R. Gupta, and D. Maloney. “Intercept Method—A novel technique to correct steady-state relative permeability data for capillary end effects”. SPE171797-PA (2014) [Google Scholar]
- F. Lomeland, E. Ebeltoft, and W.H. Thomas, “A new versatile relative permeability correlation”. SCA 2005-32. (2005). [Google Scholar]
- J. Osoba, J. Richardson, J. Kerver, J. Hafford, and P. Blair. “Laboratory Measurements of Relative Permeability”. Petroleum Transactions AIME, 192, 47–56 (1951). [Google Scholar]
- J. Batycky and F. McCaffery. “Low interfacial tension displacement studies”. Petroleum Society of CIM, Calgary, Canada, Paper 78.29.26. 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Raimondi, P. “Distribution of the oil phase obtained upon imbibition of water”. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 49–55 (1964) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Colonna, F. Brissaud, and J.L. Millet. “Evolution of capillarity and relative permeability hysteresis”. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 12, 28–38 (1972). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Fulcher, E. Turkay and C. Stahl. “Effect of capillary number and its constituents on two-phase relative permeability curves”. SPE 21170-PA (1985) [Google Scholar]
- J. Gerhard and B. Keuper. “Relative permeability characteristics necessary for simulating DNAPL infiltration, redistribution and immobilization in saturated porous media”. Water Resources Research 39, W1213 (2003) [Google Scholar]
- G. Jerauld, and S. Salter, S. J. “The effect of porestructure on hysteresis in relative permeability and capillary pressure”. Transport in Porous Media, 5, 103–151 (1990). [Google Scholar]
- P. Valvatne and M. Blunt. “Predictive pore-scale modelling of two-phase flow in mixed-wet media”. Water Resources Research 40, W07406, (2004). [Google Scholar]
- A. Kjosavik, J. Ringen, and S. Skjaeveland. “Relative Permeability Correlation for Mixed-Wet Reservoirs”. SPE Journal, 7, 49–58 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Andersson, S. Schlueter, and D. Wildenshild. “Defining a novel pore-body to pore-throat ‘Morphological Aspect Ratio’ that scales with residual non-wetting phase capillary trapping in porous media”. Advances in Water Resources, 122, 251–26. (2018) [Google Scholar]
- Schembre-McCabe, R. Salazar-Tio, and J. Kamath, 2012. “Two examples of adding value through Digital Rock Technology”. SCA 2012-081 (2012) [Google Scholar]
- R. Farokhpoor, E. Westphal, N. Idowu, P. Oren and B. Fletcher. “Gas-water steady-state relative permeability determination with two approaches; experimental and digital rock analysis, strengths and weaknesses”. SCA2016-12. (2016) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.