Is contact angle a cause or an effect? – A cautionary tale

Douglas Ruth

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202014603004

All issues

Volume 146 (2020)

E3S Web Conf., 146 (2020) 03004

References

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 146, 2020 The 2019 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2019)


Article Number		03004
Number of page(s)		8
Section		Improved SCAL Techniques and Interpretation
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014603004
Published online		05 February 2020

F.F. Craig, jr., The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding, (SPE Monograph Series, 3, 1971). [Google Scholar]
G. Macdougall, and C. Ockrent, “Surface energy relations in liquid/solid systems. I. The adhesion of liquids to solids and a new method of determining the surface tension of liquids”, PRSA 180, 981, 151-173, (1942). [Google Scholar]
B. Krasovitski and A. Marmur,“Drops down the hill: Theoretical study of limiting contact angles and the hysteresis range on a tilted plate”, Langmuir, 21, 3881-3885, (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
R.G. Cox, “The dynamics of spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow”, JFM, 168. 169-194, (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Fermigier and P. Jenffer, “An experimental investigation of the dynamic contact angle in liquid-liquid systems”, JCIS, 146, 1, 226-241, (1991). [Google Scholar]
M. Andrew, B. Bijeljic, and M.J. Blunt, “Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microscopy”, AWR, 68, June, 24-31, (2014). [Google Scholar]
R. Held, N. Schleifer, L. Genolet, and A. Fogden, “Added insight from image-based wettability characterization”, E3S Web Conference, 89, (International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, 2018). [Google Scholar]
A. AlRatrout, A.Q. Raeini, B. Bijeljic, and M. Blunt, “Automatic measurement of contact angle in pore-scale images”, AWR, 109, 158-269, (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] F.F. Craig, jr., The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding, (SPE Monograph Series, 3, 1971). [Google Scholar]

[2] G. Macdougall, and C. Ockrent, “Surface energy relations in liquid/solid systems. I. The adhesion of liquids to solids and a new method of determining the surface tension of liquids”, PRSA 180, 981, 151-173, (1942). [Google Scholar]

[3] B. Krasovitski and A. Marmur,“Drops down the hill: Theoretical study of limiting contact angles and the hysteresis range on a tilted plate”, Langmuir, 21, 3881-3885, (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[4] R.G. Cox, “The dynamics of spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow”, JFM, 168. 169-194, (1986). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[5] M. Fermigier and P. Jenffer, “An experimental investigation of the dynamic contact angle in liquid-liquid systems”, JCIS, 146, 1, 226-241, (1991). [Google Scholar]

[6] M. Andrew, B. Bijeljic, and M.J. Blunt, “Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microscopy”, AWR, 68, June, 24-31, (2014). [Google Scholar]

[7] R. Held, N. Schleifer, L. Genolet, and A. Fogden, “Added insight from image-based wettability characterization”, E3S Web Conference, 89, (International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, 2018). [Google Scholar]

[8] A. AlRatrout, A.Q. Raeini, B. Bijeljic, and M. Blunt, “Automatic measurement of contact angle in pore-scale images”, AWR, 109, 158-269, (2017). [Google Scholar]