Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 172, 2020
12th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics (NSB 2020)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Climate change and buildings
Published online 30 June 2020
  1. IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. IPCC, Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, et al. (eds.)]. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32 pp. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  3. NOAA, 2019 was 2nd hottest year on record for Earth say NOAA, NASA. Accessed at 22/01/2020.2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. World Meteorological Organisation, 2019 set to be 2nd or 3rd warmest year on record. Accessed at 22/01/2020.2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Klimatscenarier (In English: Climate Scenarios). Accessed at 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. IEA, Key world energy statistics. 2018: International Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
  7. BP, BP Energy Outlook.. Available at, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. IPCC, Intergovernmental panel on climate change. 2007, IPCC Secretariat Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  9. International Energy Agency, Redrawing the Energy-climate Map: World Energy Outlook Special Report. 2013: OECD/IEA. [Google Scholar]
  10. European Commission, Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius. The way ahead for 2020 and beyond. 2007, COM/2007/2. [Google Scholar]
  11. European Commission, Paris Agreement. Accesed at on 09/ 01/2017. 2016, EC. [Google Scholar]
  12. Directive 2010/31/EU, Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May2010 on the energy performance of buildings (Recast), Official Journal of the European Union. L 153, 18/06/2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Amato, A.D., et al., Regional energy demand responses to climate change: Methodology and application to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Climatic Change, 2005. 71(1-2): p. 175-201. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nik, V.M., et al., Future moisture loads for building facades in Sweden: Climate change and wind-driven rain. Building and Environment, 2015. 93, Part 2: p. 362-375. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dodoo, A., L. Gustavsson, and F. Bonakdar, Effects of Future Climate Change Scenarios on Overheating Risk and Primary Energy Use for Swedish Residential Buildings. Energy Procedia, 2014. 61: p. 1179-1182. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodrigues, L.T., M. Gillott, and D. Tetlow, Summer overheating potential in a low-energy steel frame house in future climate scenarios. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2013(7): p. 1-15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Frank, T., Climate change impacts on building heating and cooling energy demand in Switzerland. Energy and Buildings, 2005. 37(11): p. 1175-1185. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jenkins, D.P., A.D. Peacock, and P.F.G. Banfill, Will future low-carbon schools in the UK have an overheating problem? Building and Environment, 2009. 44(3): p. 490-501. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nik, V.M. and A. Sasic Kalagasidis, Impact study of the climate change on the energy performance of the building stock in Stockholm considering four climate uncertainties. Building and Environment, 2013. 60: p. 291-304. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, X., D. Chen, and Z. Ren, Assessment of climate change impact on residential building heating and cooling energy requirement in Australia. Building and Environment, 2010. 45(7): p. 1663-1682. [Google Scholar]
  21. Berger, T., et al., Impacts of climate change upon cooling and heating energy demand of office buildings in Vienna, Austria. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 80: p. 517-530. [Google Scholar]
  22. Olonscheck, M., A. Holsten, and J.P. Kropp, Heating and cooling energy demand and related emissions of the German residential building stock under climate change. Energy Policy, 2011. 39(9): p. 4795-4806. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nik, V.M., E. Mata, and A.S. Kalagasidis, Assessing the Efficiency and Robustness of the Retrofitted Building Envelope Against Climate change. Energy Procedia, 2015. 78: p. 955-960. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nik, V.M., A. Sasic Kalagasidis, and E. Kjellström, Statistical methods for assessing and analysing the building performance in respect to the future climate. Building and Environment, 2012. 53: p. 107-118. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tettey, U.Y.A., A. Dodoo, and L. Gustavsson, Design strategies and measures to minimise operation energy use for passive houses under different climate scenarios. Energy Efficiency, 2019. 12(1): p. 299-313. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dodoo, A. and L. Gustavsson, Energy use and overheating risk of Swedish multi-storey residential buildings under different climate scenarios. Energy, 2016. 97: p. 534-548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thorsson, S., et al., Potential changes in outdoor thermal comfort conditions in Gothenburg, Sweden due to climate change: the influence of urban geometry. International Journal of Climatology, 2011. 31(2): p. 324-335. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Dataserier med normalvärden för perioden 1961-1990. (In English: Data series of normal values for the period 1961-1990). 2009. Accessed at [Google Scholar]
  29. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Rossby Centre regional atmospheric model RCA4. 2011. Accessed at [Google Scholar]
  30. Belcher, S., J. Hacker, and D. Powell, Constructing design weather data for future climates. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 2005. 26(1): p. 49-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. StruSoft, VIP-Energy software, Sweden. Available from on 10/01/2019.2019. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dodoo, A., U.Y.A. Tettey, and L. Gustavsson, On input parameters, methods and assumptions for energy balance and retrofit analyses for residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 137: p. 76-89. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dodoo, A., U.Y.A. Tettey, and L. Gustavsson, Influence of simulation assumptions and input parameters on energy balance calculations of residential buildings. Energy, 2017. 120: p. 718-730. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Boverkets Byggregler, Boverkets Författningssamling, The national Board of Housing Building and planning, Karlskrona. Accessed at on 10/ 04/2017, (In Swedish). 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Camfil, City pollution. AirMail No. 2. 2014. Accessed at on 12/ 04/2017. [Google Scholar]
  36. ISO, 7730. Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment: Analytical Determination and Interpretation of Thermal Comfort Using Calculation of the PMV and PPD Indices and Local Thermal Comfort Criteria. International Organization for Standardization., 2005. [Google Scholar]
  37. Socialstyrelsen, Temperaturer inomhus. 2005(91-7201-972-7). [Google Scholar]
  38. CIBSE, G.A., Environmental design. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. Peacock, A.D., D.P. Jenkins, and D. Kane, Investigating the potential of overheating in UK dwellings as a consequence of extant climate change. Energy Policy, 2010. 38(7): p. 3277-3288. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.