Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hydraulic Fracturing and Unconventional Hydrocarbons
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. K. Amalokwu, A.I. Best, J. Sothcott, M. Chapman, T. Minshull, & X.Y. Li, Water Saturation Effects on Elastic Wave Attenuation in Porous Rocks with Aligned Fractures. Geophysical Journal International, 197(2), 943-947 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Amalokwu, M. Chapman, A.I. Best, J. Sothcott, T.A. Minshull, & X.Y. Li, Experimental Observation of Water Saturation Effects on Shear Wave Splitting in Synthetic Rock with Fractures Aligned at Oblique Angles. Geophysical Journal International, 200(1), 17-24 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Kamali-Asl, B. KC, E. Ghazanfari, & A. Hedayat, Flow-Induced Alterations of Ultrasonic Signatures and Fracture Aperture Under Constant State of Stress in a Single-Fractured Rock. Geophysics, 84(4), WA115-WA125 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Kamali-Asl, B. Kc, M. Foroutan, E. Ghazanfari, T.T. Cladouhos, & M. Stevens, Stress-Strain Response and Seismic Signature Analysis of Phyllite Reservoir Rocks from Blue Mountain Geothermal Field. Geothermics, 77, 204-223 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Katsuki, M. Gutierrez, & A. Almrabat, Stress-Dependent Shear Wave Splitting and Permeability in Fractured Porous Rock. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 11(1), 1-11 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Aleardi, & A. Mazzotti, A Feasibility Study on the Expected Seismic AVA Signatures of Deep Fractured Geothermal Reservoirs in an Intrusive Basement. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 11(6), 065008 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T.A. Taira, A. Nayak, F. Brenguier, & M. Manga, Monitoring Reservoir Response to Earthquakes and Fluid Extraction, Salton Sea Geothermal Field, California. Science Advances, 4(1), e1701536 (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. M.W. McClure, & R.N. Horne, An Investigation of Stimulation Mechanisms in Enhanced Geothermal Systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 72, 242-260 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Finnila, W. Dershowitz, T. Doe, & R. McLaren, Hydro-Shearing and Hydraulic Fracturing for Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Archetypical Normal, Strike-Slip, and Thrust Faulting Terrains. GRC Trans, 39, 1-19 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. M.E. Willis, D.R. Burns, R. Rao, B. Minsley, M.N. Toksöz, & L. Vetri, Spatial Orientation and Distribution of Reservoir Fractures from Scattered Seismic Energy. Geophysics, 71(5), O43-O51 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Fang, M. Fehler, T. Chen, D. Burns, & Z. Zhu, Sensitivity Analysis of Fracture Scattering. Geophysics, 78(1), T1-T10 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Mallick, K.L. Craft, L.J. Meister, & R.E. Chambers, Determination of The Principal Directions of Azimuthal Anisotropy From P-Wave Seismic Data. Geophysics, 63(2), 692-706 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C.M. Sayers, Seismic Characterization of Reservoirs Containing Multiple Fracture Sets. Geophysical prospecting, 57(2), 187-192 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  14. M.E. Far, C.M. Sayers, L. Thomsen, D.H. Han, & J.P. Castagna, Seismic Characterization of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs Using Amplitude Versus Offset and Azimuth Analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 427-447 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Tillotson, J. Sothcott, A.I. Best, M. Chapman, & X.Y. Li, Experimental Verification of The Fracture Density and Shear‐Wave Splitting Relationship Using Synthetic Silica Cemented Sandstones with a Controlled Fracture Geometry. Geophysical Prospecting, 60(3), 516-525 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. J.J.S De Figueiredo, J. Schleicher, R.R Stewart, & N. Dyaur, Estimating Fracture Orientation from Elastic‐ Wave Propagation: An Ultrasonic Experimental Approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 117(B8) (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. L.J. Pyrak-Nolte, The Seismic Response of Fractures and The Interrelations Among Fracture Properties. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts, 33(8), 787-802 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M.A. Schoenberg, S. Dean, & C.M. Sayers, Azimuth-Dependent Tuning of Seismic Waves Reflected from Fractured Reservoirs. Geophysics, 64(4), 1160-1171 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. S. T. M. D5777-00, Standard Guide for Using the Seismic Refraction Method for Subsurface Investigation: ASTM International (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Zhao, & J.G. Cai, Transmission of Elastic P-Waves Across Single Fractures with A Nonlinear Normal Deformational Behavior. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 34(1), 3-22 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  21. L.J. Pyrak‐Nolte, L.R. Myer, & N.G. Cook, Transmission of Seismic Waves Across Single Natural Fractures. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 95(B6), 8617-8638 (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. F.K. Boadu, & L.T. Long, Effects of Fractures on Seismic-Wave Velocity and Attenuation. Geophysical Journal International, 127(1), 86-110 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  23. Holt, R. M., Nes, O. M., & Fjaer, E, In-situ Stress Dependence of Wave Velocities in Reservoir and Overburden Rocks. The Leading Edge, 24(12), 1268-1274, (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. KC, B., Kamali-Asl, A., & Ghazanfari, E., Seismic Signatures as a Proxy for Fracture Aperture Alterations in Reservoir Rock. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, (2018, December). [Google Scholar]
  25. Kamali-Asl, A., Ghazanfari, E., Perdrial, N., & Cladouhos, T., Effects of Injection Fluid Type on Pressure-Dependent Permeability Evolution of Fractured Rocks in Geothermal Reservoirs: An Experimental Chemo-mechanical Study. Geothermics, 87, 101832, (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.