Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 08008
Number of page(s) 4
Section Minisymposium: Solid-Fluid Interactions in Emerging Energy Geo-Systems (organized by Shahrzad Roshankhah and Seunghee Kim)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020508008
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. Kang, Q., et al., Pore scale modeling of reactive transport involved in geologic CO 2 sequestration. Transport in porous media, 2010. 82(1): p. 197-213. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhao, X., M.J. Blunt, and J. Yao, Pore-scale modeling: Effects of wettability on waterflood oil recovery. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2010. 71(3-4): p. 169-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Held, R.J. and M.A. Celia, Pore‐scale modeling and upscaling of nonaqueous phase liquid mass transfer. Water Resources Research, 2001. 37(3): p. 539-549. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lenormand, R., Liquids in porous media. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 1990. 2(S): p. SA79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lenormand, R., E. Touboul, and C. Zarcone, Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media. Journal of fluid mechanics, 1988. 189: p. 165-187. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham, A.B., et al., Influence of biofilm accumulation on porous media hydrodynamics. Environmental science & technology, 1991. 25(7): p. 1305-1311. [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng, W., et al., Effect of Permeable Biofilm on Micro-And Macro-Scale Flow and Transport in Bioclogged Pores. Environmental science & technology, 2013. 47(19): p. 11092-11098. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, J.-W., H. Choi, and Y.A. Pachepsky, Biofilm morphology as related to the porous media clogging. Water Research, 2010. 44(4): p. 1193-1201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. López, H.M., et al., Turning bacteria suspensions into superfluids. Physical review letters, 2015. 115(2): p. 028301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakhshi, N., S. Soleimanian-Zad, and M. Sheikh-Zeinoddin, Dynamic surface tension measurement for the screening of biosurfactants produced by Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum PTCC 1896. Enzyme and microbial technology, 2017. 101: p. 1-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Son, K., D.R. Brumley, and R. Stocker, Live from under the lens: exploring microbial motility with dynamic imaging and microfluidics. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2015. 13(12): p. 761. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lauga, E. and T.R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2009. 72(9): p. 096601. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giomi, L., T.B. Liverpool, and M.C. Marchetti, Sheared active fluids: Thickening, thinning, and vanishing viscosity. Physical Review E, 2010. 81(5): p. 051908. [Google Scholar]
  14. Patteson, A.E., A. Gopinath, and P.E. Arratia, Active colloids in complex fluids. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 2016. 21: p. 86-96. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, Y., B. Jeong, and S. Dai. Impacts of motile Escherichia coli on surface tension. in ICEGT2020. 2020. La Jolla. [Google Scholar]
  16. Berg, H.C., E. coli in Motion. 2008: Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  17. Purcell, E.M., Life at low Reynolds number. American journal of physics, 1977. 45(1): p. 3-11. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haines, B.M., et al., Three-dimensional model for the effective viscosity of bacterial suspensions. Physical Review E, 2009. 80(4): p. 041922. [Google Scholar]
  19. Saintillan, D., The dilute rheology of swimming suspensions: A simple kinetic model. Experimental Mechanics, 2010. 50(9): p. 1275-1281. [Google Scholar]
  20. Alonso-Matilla, R., B. Ezhilan, and D. Saintillan, Microfluidic rheology of active particle suspensions: Kinetic theory. Biomicrofluidics, 2016. 10(4): p. 043505. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.