Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2020
Innovative Technologies in Science and Education (ITSE-2020)
Article Number 18040
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environmental Education
Published online 04 December 2020
  1. M. C. Roco, et al., Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. Convergence of Knowledge, Technology and Society. Science Policy Reports. Springer, Cham (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Williams, W. Steffen, P. Crutzen, The New World of the Anthropocene. Environmental science [amp] technology, 44(7), 2228-2231 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Lundstrom, H. S. Philip Wong, Convergence Platforms: Foundational Science and Technology Tools. Convergence of Knowledge, Technology and Society. Science Policy Reports. Springer, Cham (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. O. E. Baksansky, Philosophy and Culture, 7(79), 1061–1068 (2014) DOI: [Google Scholar]
  5. S. C. Müller, P. J. Plath, G. Radons, A. Fuchs (Hrsg.), Complexity and Synergetics (2018) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64334-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. V. G. Budanov, I. A. Aseeva, Anthropology archaeology history and philosophy medieval [amp] renaissance studies, 2, 565–573 (2017) DOI: [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Buenstorf, Evolution, Organization and Economic Behaviour. Edward Elgar Publishing, 253 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Fusaroliab, J. Rączaszek-Leonardic, K. Tylénab, New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Tschacher, M. Tröndle, Futures, 43(1), 67–75 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Haken, J. Portugali, Royal Society Open Science, 6, 8 (2019) DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191087 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Haken, Synergetics: Is self-organization governed by universal principles? In: The Evolutionary Vision: Toward A Unifying Paradigm of Physical, Biological and Sociocultural Evolution, 15–24 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Petrenko, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 407–413 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. I. Osipova, V. S. Okuneva, Modern problems of science and education, 3 (2012) URL: [Google Scholar]
  14. L. I. Tararina, E. E. Sokolova, E. V. Limarova, L. N. Ivanova, S. N. Fedorova, A. G. Oshaev, S. A. Chernov, E. R. Khairullina, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 98–104 (2015). DOI:10.5901/MJSS.2015.V6N2S3P98 [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Belligh, K. Willems, Language Sciences, 83, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N. P. Revyakina, E. E. Sakharova, Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2(22), 38–40 (2020) (Last accessed 13. 06.2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Kolkmann, I. L. Falkumb, Journal of Pragmatics, 157, 1–16 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. K. Gural, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 154, 3–7 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Dombrovan, An Introduction to Linguistic Synergetics. Cambridge Scholars Publishing (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. A. Nyman, S. K. Gural, V. M. Smokotin, M. A. Bovtenko, Language and Culture, 21 90–106 (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.